
Picture of one of Napyidaws absurdly wide roads.
Most definitely not leveled like an airstrip.
Advertisement

by The Kievan People » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:12 pm


by The Kievan People » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:15 pm
Allanea wrote:It's quite possible that the tank is not always capable of maneuvering the gun barrel.

by Padnak » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:18 pm
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

by Imperializt Russia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:41 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Rich and Corporations » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:55 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Rich and Corporations wrote:assuming that the barrel is of a sane length
If you have to move the gun barrel beyond the front sixty degree arc, or even the 30-45 degree arc in a narrow town street, your infantry support has probably failed and your unit deserves to be killed.
Besides, this is what roof clutter guns are for.

Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |

by Padnak » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:57 pm
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

by Imperializt Russia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:58 pm
Rich and Corporations wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:If you have to move the gun barrel beyond the front sixty degree arc, or even the 30-45 degree arc in a narrow town street, your infantry support has probably failed and your unit deserves to be killed.
Besides, this is what roof clutter guns are for.
http://www.defense.gov/Photos/NewsPhoto ... otoID=5842
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Rich and Corporations » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:59 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:That's supporting fires, not defence of the tank, which I thought we were concerning ourselves with.
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |

by Yukonastan » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:00 pm
Padnak wrote:Anyone looking for some insanity on a friday night, we're trying to militarize a bagger 288

by New Vihenia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:00 pm

by Purpelia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:22 pm

by Lydenburg » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:30 pm
Padnak wrote:As part of my new reform plan for the next mandate, I shall now ask 90% more reasonable questions 80% of the time.
RWS MANPAD on tanks? Outside of it taking up a bit of room, I would think having an anti helicopter weapon that can be fired from inside of a tank would be beneficial. Thoughts on this?
How effective is spaced armor against Kinetic energy perpetrators? I know its potent against HEAT ammunition, but I'm unsure of what it would do to KEP ammo

by Yukonastan » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:34 pm
Purpelia wrote:All of you should by now be familiar with my Ymir and its top attack guided atomic shaped charges. Well I have an alternate question for you. The thing fires missiles that are several meters long and 22cm in diameter. Assume one of them follows the standard top attack pattern and dives right down onto a tank. Now assume it's a dud. So you have this thing falling at a considerable speed toward the roof of your vehicle. Assume it does hit. How much damage could it do?

by Lydenburg » Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:53 pm

by The Kievan People » Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:55 pm

by The Greater Luthorian Empire » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:01 pm
Purpelia wrote:All of you should by now be familiar with my Ymir and its top attack guided atomic shaped charges. Well I have an alternate question for you. The thing fires missiles that are several meters long and 22cm in diameter. Assume one of them follows the standard top attack pattern and dives right down onto a tank. Now assume it's a dud. So you have this thing falling at a considerable speed toward the roof of your vehicle. Assume it does hit. How much damage could it do?
Imperializt Russia wrote:They told me I could be anything, so I became a razor blade.

by Yukonastan » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:02 pm
The Greater Luthorian Empire wrote:Purpelia wrote:All of you should by now be familiar with my Ymir and its top attack guided atomic shaped charges. Well I have an alternate question for you. The thing fires missiles that are several meters long and 22cm in diameter. Assume one of them follows the standard top attack pattern and dives right down onto a tank. Now assume it's a dud. So you have this thing falling at a considerable speed toward the roof of your vehicle. Assume it does hit. How much damage could it do?
Probably knock it out. Moot point anyway since the Ymir would have been knocked out beforehand or immediately after by any competent air force or army. A turretless tank with a highly limited supply of ammo with the footprint and practically the weight of a house is not the most sound idea. The only superheavy tank I give a pass to is the LY6A1 (even then it is classified as an assault gun) because it follows my internal progression of tank mass/gun caliber/role.
Medium Tank, 120 mm gun, 60-70 tons
Heavy Tank, 140 mm gun, 75-90 tons
Superheavy Tank, 180 mm gun, 95-120 tons
Not that I would ever use a superheavy tank, but I still have an internal progression of insanity that I prefer to see followed in vehicles I like.

by The Kievan People » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:23 pm

by Lithuania-Latvia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:26 pm

by Triplebaconation » Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:54 pm

by The Akasha Colony » Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:15 pm

by Allanea » Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:20 pm
Lithuania-Latvia wrote:The MBT of the Kingdom of Lithuania is the M1A2 Abrams, but we are designing an upgunned version armed with a 140mm smooth bore cannon, named the M1A3 Diplomat, how well would that work?

by Lithuania-Latvia » Sat Aug 02, 2014 12:40 am
Allanea wrote:Lithuania-Latvia wrote:The MBT of the Kingdom of Lithuania is the M1A2 Abrams, but we are designing an upgunned version armed with a 140mm smooth bore cannon, named the M1A3 Diplomat, how well would that work?
There's no reason it wouldn't work.
You'd have slightly less ammunition space, but it's notable such a thing was in fact in existence in prototype.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement