Triplebaconation wrote:Ingwe is TOW's illegitimate racist great-grandson by way of MAPATS which begat ZT-3.
pretty sure this is 100% true.
Advertisement

by San-Silvacian » Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:02 pm
Triplebaconation wrote:Ingwe is TOW's illegitimate racist great-grandson by way of MAPATS which begat ZT-3.

by Gallia- » Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:13 pm
Triplebaconation wrote:Ingwe is TOW's illegitimate racist great-grandson by way of MAPATS which begat ZT-3.

by Yukonastan » Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:23 pm

by New Vihenia » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:04 am
Yukonastan wrote:So apparently Russia did what I'm doing in canon with standard chassis tracked vehicles. Can't seem to find a good Armata picture anywhere, though.

by Yukonastan » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:08 am
New Vihenia wrote:Yukonastan wrote:So apparently Russia did what I'm doing in canon with standard chassis tracked vehicles. Can't seem to find a good Armata picture anywhere, though.
Because real picture of Armata has not been released. All pics i saw so far are either fan-art or black eagle with "Armata" stamp on it.

by San-Silvacian » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:44 am

by New Tsavon » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:37 am
San-Silvacian wrote:Its going to be a few years before Russia shows pics.

by Radicchio » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:45 am

by Yukonastan » Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:28 am

by San-Silvacian » Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:42 am

by Radicchio » Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:06 am

by The Kievan People » Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:26 am
Radicchio wrote:What would be a comparable missile?

by Radicchio » Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:31 am
The Kievan People wrote:Radicchio wrote:What would be a comparable missile?
There isn't one (it has a smaller warhead than the TOW-2A. Newer, but smaller). It is a 60lb subsonic beamriding missile with a 5 inch warhead and 5km range. Nothing else quite like that.
Refleks is probably closer than anything.

by Questers » Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:39 am
Well Tovari- er, Gospotin Shoigu, we looked at successful tank design in world. New tank is have 4 man crew. Three in turret, and have single piece manual loaded. Additional, armour composed of depleted uranium. Tank was given diesel turbine, not unlike Tankov 80. In fact, we name new tank, T-90NATO, but this is not sound good, so reclassify as T-95...

by Yukonastan » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:17 pm



by Stahn » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:29 pm


by Stasnov » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:38 pm
Puzikas wrote:"Wanna know how I got these scars?"- Gorby probably
Yalos wrote:"Nazi Germany lost WW2 because it thought like an NS player"

by Stahn » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:40 pm

by Stasnov » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:52 pm
Puzikas wrote:"Wanna know how I got these scars?"- Gorby probably
Yalos wrote:"Nazi Germany lost WW2 because it thought like an NS player"
by Crookfur » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:16 pm
Radicchio wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
pretty sure this is 100% true.
But is i a good (effective) anti-armor missile for a 21st centur army?
Am thinkin of buying a lot of them from this g,e&t guy an wondering how/where they would be best used.
Are they a match a all fo a MBT? Or do they need to stay in the AFV killer role?

by Stahn » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:34 pm

by Yukonastan » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:12 pm

by Gallia- » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:45 pm

by San-Silvacian » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:47 pm

by Stahn » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:54 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Alliance Star
Advertisement