The NS Infantry Discussion Thread, Model 4

[Kouralia]

funny way of saying 7.62×51mm NATO

7.5x55mm Swiss > all other rounds.

You spelled 7.7x56mm R wrong.

Page 464

[Purpelia]

You spelled 7.7x56mm R wrong.

Nonsense. I'll have you know that I have newer in my life fired a rifle. I have newer held a firearm in my hand. In fact, I have not even seen one in person ever except inside a holster so that I could not see much at all. That surely makes me the dominant expert on these things.

[Crookfur]

So talking about ballock daggers in finally got around to attempting a drawing of the first Crookfur bayonnet, a ballock dagger/transitional dirk based plug bayonnet.



The pommel unscrews to allow the hilt to shoved down a musket barrel.

It was first produced in the 1670s and served right upto the introduction of the standardised Musket pattern of 1735 although some users had transitioned to socket bayonnets in the 1700s.

[Imperializt Russia]

7.5x55mm Swiss > all other rounds.

You spelled 7.7x56mm R wrong.

Page 464

So did you, that has a four in it.

[Purpelia]

So talking about ballock daggers in finally got around to attempting a drawing of the first Crookfur bayonnet, a ballock dagger/transitional dirk based plug bayonnet.

(Image)

The pommel unscrews to allow the hilt to shoved down a musket barrel.

It was first produced in the 1670s and served right upto the introduction of the standardised Musket pattern of 1735 although some users had transitioned to socket bayonnets in the 1700s.

If you don't mind me saying. I think that there would be an issue with the shape of the handle. Since it is not strait, it's not exactly going to fit properly inside a musket barrel. So either you are going to get a very shallow mount or a not very snug one.

[Crookfur]

So talking about ballock daggers in finally got around to attempting a drawing of the first Crookfur bayonnet, a ballock dagger/transitional dirk based plug bayonnet.

(Image)

The pommel unscrews to allow the hilt to shoved down a musket barrel.

It was first produced in the 1670s and served right upto the introduction of the standardised Musket pattern of 1735 although some users had transitioned to socket bayonnets in the 1700s.

If you don't mind me saying. I think that there would be an issue with the shape of the handle. Since it is not strait, it's not exactly going to fit properly inside a musket barrel. So either you are going to get a very shallow mount or a not very snug one.

To honest its a kind of mix of various plug bayonnet grips some of which are very tapered and some quite narrow with a sharper "swelling"/taper close the guard.

IIRC the taper tended to be done to account for different calibres of firearm.

[Purpelia]

To honest its a kind of mix of various plug bayonnet grips some of which are very tapered and some quite narrow with a sharper "swelling"/taper close the guard.

IIRC the taper tended to be done to account for different calibres of firearm.

That sounds just haphazard and insanely unsafe enough to be historically accurate...

[The Archangel Conglomerate]

(Image)
LSW/Marksman variant.

-80cm (~32 inch) barrel
-Variable 4x scope
-50 round casket mag option (7mm Brit)
-Rail-mounted bipod

EDIT: I was debating mounting rails to the side of the 'barrel support' but decided that would add too much weight forwards.

Slick, I'd say. Too, I defiantly prefer the smooth magazine to the notPmag.

---

Is odd. On the one hand, I see this and feel my art is largely undetailed rubbish.

On the other hand

I'm 80℅ sure I'm the only one who manages this with any degree of frequency.

[Assorted Sucrose-Based Lifeforms]

You spelled 7.7x56mm R wrong.

(Image)

.303, but with an XL-70 picture?
Ah, I take it you confused the length (30.3 in/ 770mm) with the calibre?

[The balkens]

(Image)
LSW/Marksman variant.

-80cm (~32 inch) barrel
-Variable 4x scope
-50 round casket mag option (7mm Brit)
-Rail-mounted bipod

EDIT: I was debating mounting rails to the side of the 'barrel support' but decided that would add too much weight forwards.

Slick, I'd say. Too, I defiantly prefer the smooth magazine to the notPmag.

---

Is odd. On the one hand, I see this and feel my art is largely undetailed rubbish.

On the other hand

I'm 80℅ sure I'm the only one who manages this with any degree of frequency.

I. WANT.

[Novorden]

(Image)
LSW/Marksman variant.

-80cm (~32 inch) barrel
-Variable 4x scope
-50 round casket mag option (7mm Brit)
-Rail-mounted bipod

EDIT: I was debating mounting rails to the side of the 'barrel support' but decided that would add too much weight forwards.

Stop making me look like shit, you talented barstard.

No.
(i was looking for a video response, but after getting distracted I found myself watching this)

Slick, I'd say. Too, I defiantly prefer the smooth magazine to the notPmag.

Thanks.
What you want is an Emag rather than a Pmag

On the other hand

Needs more STG44

[Assorted Sucrose-Based Lifeforms]

Needs more STG44

Needs moar Gerat 06(H)

[Black Hand]

any advice as to how to turn the carbine I posted into a not a KFRP brick?
I know it needs more detail i'm just not sure what to add.

Looking back through my stat blocks i found what it is, Surprise it was a multi-caliber 9X45, 5.56X45 and 5.45X45 carbine

[Tule]

(Image)
LSW/Marksman variant.

-80cm (~32 inch) barrel
-Variable 4x scope
-50 round casket mag option (7mm Brit)
-Rail-mounted bipod

EDIT: I was debating mounting rails to the side of the 'barrel support' but decided that would add too much weight forwards.

Slick, I'd say. Too, I defiantly prefer the smooth magazine to the notPmag.

---

Is odd. On the one hand, I see this and feel my art is largely undetailed rubbish.

On the other hand

I'm 80℅ sure I'm the only one who manages this with any degree of frequency.

DON'T TOUCH IT! IT'S PERFECT JUST THE WAY IT IS!

[Nirvash Type TheEND]

So talking about ballock daggers in finally got around to attempting a drawing of the first Crookfur bayonnet, a ballock dagger/transitional dirk based plug bayonnet.

(Image)

The pommel unscrews to allow the hilt to shoved down a musket barrel.

It was first produced in the 1670s and served right upto the introduction of the standardised Musket pattern of 1735 although some users had transitioned to socket bayonnets in the 1700s.

More like bollock dagger amirite? :')

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

Can you post BDU's here as well?

[Nirvash Type TheEND]

Can you post BDU's here as well?

Yes.

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

Can you post BDU's here as well?

Yes.

http://i.imgur.com/eCcYQC2.png

Still working on credits for parts used.

[Nirvash Type TheEND]

Yes.

http://i.imgur.com/eCcYQC2.png

Still working on credits for parts used.

Love the asymmetry.

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

http://i.imgur.com/eCcYQC2.png

Still working on credits for parts used.

Love the asymmetry.

Thank you, nothing beyond an aesthetic thing though.

A support unit may have it for added equipment or something.

http://i.imgur.com/MbEFPIL.png

Another, for a specific Squad.

[Yukonastan]

Can you post BDU's here as well?

This IS the Infantry Discussion Thread, it's no longer MMW. Hasn't been for a while.

In other words, why not?
Nice, the two you've shown so far.

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

Can you post BDU's here as well?

This IS the Infantry Discussion Thread, it's no longer MMW. Hasn't been for a while.

In other words, why not?
Nice, the two you've shown so far.

I'm getting more parts and looking to make a new template.

Those uniforms will be defunct the end of the century

I'm sure the Guard can't wait for the hand me downs.

[Balshvik]

Yes.

http://i.imgur.com/eCcYQC2.png

Still working on credits for parts used.

At what site did you go to create this?

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

http://i.imgur.com/eCcYQC2.png

Still working on credits for parts used.

At what site did you go to create this?

I used MS Paint.

Editing shapes, colors, making parts, combining parts, using parts, recoloring, etc.

The base is made form a USCM made by someone, I gotta check who it is again, but I'm currently making my own body now.

[The Archangel Conglomerate]

(i was looking for a video response, but after getting distracted I found myself watching this)

That was pretty awesome.

What you want is an Emag rather than a Pmag

I learned a new thing today

Needs more STG44

DON'T TOUCH IT! IT'S PERFECT JUST THE WAY IT IS!

Tule understands.

---

I. WANT.

You can haz. Just be sure to tell everyone where you found it.

---

Needs moar Gerat 06(H)

RDB get rekt. Flapper locked short stroke 4 lyfe.

---

any advice as to how to turn the carbine I posted into a not a KFRP brick?
I know it needs more detail i'm just not sure what to add.

Erm. . . depth lines? Shading? Rivets or pins. . . toggles and logos. Stuff like that.