Mirage 4000 could take them all on.
And win.
Without even trying
In space.
Advertisement

by San-Silvacian » Mon May 05, 2014 1:27 pm

by Transnapastain » Mon May 05, 2014 5:26 pm

by Spirit of Hope » Mon May 05, 2014 5:35 pm
Transnapastain wrote:In what way could TIE Interceptors, Imperial I, or Imperial II (I can't tell the difference) star destroyers, the Executer, and the second Death Star, be considered mechs?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Transnapastain » Mon May 05, 2014 5:37 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Transnapastain wrote:In what way could TIE Interceptors, Imperial I, or Imperial II (I can't tell the difference) star destroyers, the Executer, and the second Death Star, be considered mechs?
He went in the ground combat vehicle thread and got yelled at for posting an AT-AT, he didn't think it counted as a mech.
Mecha is a science fiction genre that centers on robots or machines controlled by people. These machines vary greatly in size, shape, and appearance. Some are little more than cars with arms and legs, while others are giant humanoid constructs.

by The Corparation » Mon May 05, 2014 5:56 pm

| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |

by NewLakotah » Mon May 05, 2014 6:09 pm
Gvozdevsk wrote:So I've been using the HAL Tejas as my primary fighter alongside the Su-35. Have I been making a terrible mistake or is the Tejas good to go when compared to similar aircraft?

by San-Silvacian » Mon May 05, 2014 8:27 pm
NewLakotah wrote:Gvozdevsk wrote:So I've been using the HAL Tejas as my primary fighter alongside the Su-35. Have I been making a terrible mistake or is the Tejas good to go when compared to similar aircraft?
The Tejas is fine in a support role to a air superiority fighter, which can easily be filled by the Su-35. The Tejas is a light fighter and not designed for heavy combat usage like most air superiority fighters. It also depends on the numbers that you deploy for each, but it isn't a bad choice though I would make sure my air superiority fighters are given the edge when it comes to funding.

by Atlantica » Mon May 05, 2014 9:07 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:NewLakotah wrote:The Tejas is fine in a support role to a air superiority fighter, which can easily be filled by the Su-35. The Tejas is a light fighter and not designed for heavy combat usage like most air superiority fighters. It also depends on the numbers that you deploy for each, but it isn't a bad choice though I would make sure my air superiority fighters are given the edge when it comes to funding.
Heavy combat usage
Light fighters are meant for heavy combat.
The USAF wouldn't have 1,200 of them if they weren't.

by Sde Dov » Tue May 06, 2014 3:58 am

by Anacasppia » Tue May 06, 2014 4:45 am
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.
Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

by San-Silvacian » Tue May 06, 2014 5:19 am

by Premislyd » Tue May 06, 2014 6:15 am
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing

by San-Silvacian » Tue May 06, 2014 6:31 am

by Sde Dov » Tue May 06, 2014 7:19 am
Anacasppia wrote:You have strangely few AWACS for an air force of your size - factoring in maintenance and turnaround, you'll often only have one in the air.

by San-Silvacian » Tue May 06, 2014 8:06 am

by Licana » Tue May 06, 2014 12:18 pm
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by San-Silvacian » Tue May 06, 2014 12:25 pm

by NewLakotah » Tue May 06, 2014 12:54 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:NewLakotah wrote:The Tejas is fine in a support role to a air superiority fighter, which can easily be filled by the Su-35. The Tejas is a light fighter and not designed for heavy combat usage like most air superiority fighters. It also depends on the numbers that you deploy for each, but it isn't a bad choice though I would make sure my air superiority fighters are given the edge when it comes to funding.
Heavy combat usage
Light fighters are meant for heavy combat.
The USAF wouldn't have 1,200 of them if they weren't.

by NewLakotah » Tue May 06, 2014 1:07 pm

by San-Silvacian » Tue May 06, 2014 1:08 pm

by NewLakotah » Tue May 06, 2014 1:11 pm

by San-Silvacian » Tue May 06, 2014 1:13 pm

Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Clemen-light, Edush, Google [Bot], Nicitius
Advertisement