Advertisement

by White Sun » Mon Sep 22, 2014 7:11 am
First Fleet Week since before the Proteus Event to take place on schedule | The Week in Pictures

by White Sun » Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:21 am
Vancon wrote:White Sun wrote:A few of these are fictional, I give zero damns if you call me out on their being fictional or judge me for how good or not they'd be I come from a fantasy tech region so screw it.
Aerial Roster of the Imperial Sunese Air Forces
Mitsubishi F-2 - Swing-Role Fighter
Mitsubishi F-15S - Interceptor
Taiga F-3 Shinden II - Stealth Interceptor
McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II - Swing-Role Fighter, Reconnaissance Aircraft
Boeing E-767 - Airborne Early Warning and Control Radar [AEW&C]
Grumman E-2 Hawkeye - Airborne Early Warning Radar [AEW]
Boeing 767 - Aerial Refueling Tanker
C-130 Hercules - Tactical Transport Aircraft
Kawasaki C-1 - Tactical Transport Aircraft
Boeing 747-400 - VIP Transport
NAMC YS-11 - Transport/Trainer/Electronic Warfare
BAe-125 - Search and Rescue Aircraft
Fuji T-7 - Trainer Aircraft
Kawasaki T-4 - Trainer Aircraft
Mitsubishi H-60 - Anti-Submarine Warfare/Search and Rescue Helicopter
Boeing CH-47 - Transport Helicopter
Since you don't seem to want help, why did you post this here? The thread is made to critique your stuff, and if you don't want that then it simply doesn't make sense for you to put that list there.
First Fleet Week since before the Proteus Event to take place on schedule | The Week in Pictures

by World Socialist Alliance » Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:35 pm


by Yakzistan » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:10 am

by Yakzistan » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:45 am

by Yakzistan » Thu Oct 30, 2014 7:01 am
Erusuia wrote:Yakzistan wrote:What should I do with my MiG-23s in my air force ?
Should I just sell them and buy more new aircaft, which I already have like the MiG-29,Su-27 and Su-30.
I was planning to replace them with some JF-17s, it that a good idea ?
Depending on what model of MiG-23s they are, you could keep them in service along with your other aircraft or you could sell them to third world nation. Belorus sold its MiG-23s to the Sudan if I recall correctly
I would personally aim to acquire more Su-30s given that its a vastly superior aircraft compared to the MiG-29, Su-27 and JF-17 (the latter being a single engine light fighter more suitable for poor nations, and seeing as you operate Su-30s you're obviously not poor)
It all depends on what sort of threats you face

by Yakzistan » Wed May 13, 2015 9:39 am

by Yodle » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:42 pm
SC #218
Left Social Libertarian
Economic Left/Right: -5.68 (Mid 2016) to -6.30 (Jan. 2017) to -7.33 (May 2017) to -6.84 (August 2017)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69 (Mid 2016) to -4.32 (Jan. 2017) to -4.48 (May 2017) to -4.93 (August 2017)
Foreign Policy Stance: -4.99 (Mid 2016) to -6.13 (Jan. 2017) to -5.18 (May 2017) to -5.38 (August 2017) (Non-Interventionist)
Culture War Stance: -8.18 (Mid 2016) to -7.65 (Jan. 2017) to -6.95 (May 2017) to -8.22 (August 2017) (Cultural Liberal)
I am a millennial from New England, a supporter of Bernie Sanders, a self-described liberal and Democratic Socialist and currently a student attending college (with a major in Political Science).

by Yugo-Austria » Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:29 pm

by Yugo-Austria » Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:49 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Yugo-Austria wrote:Perhaps this is the wrong place to put this, but I have a question. I already know it's immoral and inhumane to do it but would it be plausible to remove the lower legs of all pilots to make it easier for them to fly? As in, there is less blood in their body, so while they are doing tricks less blood would flow to their head, right? Is this an idea that could work if put into practice?
The problem is not so much immoral as wouldn't do anything at all.
Blood is going from the heart to the brain, not from the legs. You black out because the force pulling the blood out of your head exceeds the force pushing new blood in. The heart does not start pumping harder because you lose your legs.

by Yugoshvanka » Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:37 pm
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
The Soviet Union by any other name
This nation is 1950's-60's past tech

by Yugoslav Memes » Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:35 am

by Yugoslav Territories » Wed May 18, 2016 11:59 am

by Yuketobaniac » Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:12 pm
Husseinarti wrote:F-22 is a total pussy magnet.
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

by Yuketobaniac » Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:13 pm
Husseinarti wrote:Licana wrote:
The only recently introduced aircraft that has a better track record in regards to this is the Gripen. Also, as an added bonus, both of the raptor's fatal crashes can be attributed to pilot error.
Stay jelly, bro. :>
Why didn't the 1.38933 BILLION lines of code save the pilots?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
F-22 FAILURE compared to S-47 SUPER FLANKER T-50
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

by Yuketobaniac » Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:35 pm
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

by Yuketobaniac » Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:36 pm
Licana wrote:Guns are obsolete anyway. :>
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

by Yuketobaniac » Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:41 pm
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

by Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 10:53 am

by Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 12:10 pm
Organized States wrote:Yukonastan wrote:Would this be a good air force list of equipment, why or why not?
Aircraft:
-Tactical transport: C130J Hercules
-Strategic transport: Rented, A400M, or An-124 Ruslan
-Utility helicopter: AW101
-Attack helicopter: Ka-52 Hokum-B
-Fighter: F/A-18 Super Hornet
-Ground attack aircraft: A-10 TB II
Weapons:
25mm chain gun
40mm ground attack cannon
40mm seems a little much, but what ever floats your boat, I guess.
I wouldn't really use the F/A-18 as a primary fighter unless you were in a challenging environment (the Canadian Yukon or Finland's northern most areas) or you don't have access to the nicest runways. I would lean more towards the F-16E, the Typhoon, or the F-35A if you have nicer runways or more moderate climates. For CAS/Ground Attack, I would rather use a helicopter gunship (like the Ka-52s you already have).

by Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 12:16 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:So justify the weight that a 40mm cannon has compared to its 30mm variants.

by Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 12:19 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:Yukonastan wrote:
More hitting power. More damage per shell. More useful submunitions. Lower rate of fire to compensate for reduced ammo capacity, and if skeletonized not too much heavier than the 30mm cannon.
You can use newer types of 30mm ammunition instead of using a big gun that fires really slow and weights more than most 30mm cannons.
I hope you don't try to use this for CAS.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Ankuran, Cyber Duotona, German-Eurpean Union, Kimozaki, San Mercurio
Advertisement