NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nation's Air Force Mark II:

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
White Sun
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby White Sun » Mon Sep 22, 2014 7:11 am

A few of these are fictional, I give zero damns if you call me out on their being fictional or judge me for how good or not they'd be I come from a fantasy tech region so screw it.

Aerial Roster of the Imperial Sunese Air Forces
Mitsubishi F-2 - Swing-Role Fighter
Mitsubishi F-15S - Interceptor
Taiga F-3 Shinden II - Stealth Interceptor
McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II - Swing-Role Fighter, Reconnaissance Aircraft
Boeing E-767 - Airborne Early Warning and Control Radar [AEW&C]
Grumman E-2 Hawkeye - Airborne Early Warning Radar [AEW]
Boeing 767 - Aerial Refueling Tanker
C-130 Hercules - Tactical Transport Aircraft
Kawasaki C-1 - Tactical Transport Aircraft
Boeing 747-400 - VIP Transport
NAMC YS-11 - Transport/Trainer/Electronic Warfare
BAe-125 - Search and Rescue Aircraft
Fuji T-7 - Trainer Aircraft
Kawasaki T-4 - Trainer Aircraft
Mitsubishi H-60 - Anti-Submarine Warfare/Search and Rescue Helicopter
Boeing CH-47 - Transport Helicopter
The White Sun Empire
"智徳俊英"
Kiyonai Chronicler
First Fleet Week since before the Proteus Event to take place on schedule | The Week in Pictures

User avatar
White Sun
Envoy
 
Posts: 326
Founded: Mar 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby White Sun » Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:21 am

Vancon wrote:
White Sun wrote:A few of these are fictional, I give zero damns if you call me out on their being fictional or judge me for how good or not they'd be I come from a fantasy tech region so screw it.

Aerial Roster of the Imperial Sunese Air Forces
Mitsubishi F-2 - Swing-Role Fighter
Mitsubishi F-15S - Interceptor
Taiga F-3 Shinden II - Stealth Interceptor
McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II - Swing-Role Fighter, Reconnaissance Aircraft
Boeing E-767 - Airborne Early Warning and Control Radar [AEW&C]
Grumman E-2 Hawkeye - Airborne Early Warning Radar [AEW]
Boeing 767 - Aerial Refueling Tanker
C-130 Hercules - Tactical Transport Aircraft
Kawasaki C-1 - Tactical Transport Aircraft
Boeing 747-400 - VIP Transport
NAMC YS-11 - Transport/Trainer/Electronic Warfare
BAe-125 - Search and Rescue Aircraft
Fuji T-7 - Trainer Aircraft
Kawasaki T-4 - Trainer Aircraft
Mitsubishi H-60 - Anti-Submarine Warfare/Search and Rescue Helicopter
Boeing CH-47 - Transport Helicopter

Since you don't seem to want help, why did you post this here? The thread is made to critique your stuff, and if you don't want that then it simply doesn't make sense for you to put that list there.


Because this is an open thread where anyone can post their aerial forces.
The White Sun Empire
"智徳俊英"
Kiyonai Chronicler
First Fleet Week since before the Proteus Event to take place on schedule | The Week in Pictures

User avatar
World Socialist Alliance
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jun 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby World Socialist Alliance » Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:35 pm

Image


Hornet Fighter:
Tactical fighter
Armed with four missile launchers and two machine guns
800 units

Mantis Chopper:
Combat chopper
Armed with four missile launchers and two machine guns
400 units

Helix Chopper:
Transport chopper
Armed with two machine guns and capable to transport infantry units or battle tanks
200 units

Firefly Chopper:
Transmit chopper
Armed with two machine guns and capable to transmit propaganda messages
100 units

Beetle Bomber:
Strategic bomber
Armed with two bombs of any warheads and two machine guns
50 units

User avatar
Yakzistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 387
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakzistan » Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:23 am

Since this a new thread I have to ask a question

Will a modernized MiG-23 MLD be able to take on Export model of a MiG-29 in combat ?
The Belakosarian Republic

(Formerly known as Yakzistan)

User avatar
Yakzistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 387
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakzistan » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:10 am

Thanks for the insight of a modernized MiG-23 MLD going against a export version of the MiG-29, New Vihenia.

Anyways, I plan to use the MiG-23s as second line of defense behind of the MiG-29M and Su-30M which are the front line of defense.
The Belakosarian Republic

(Formerly known as Yakzistan)

User avatar
Yakzistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 387
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

What to do with the MiGs ?

Postby Yakzistan » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:45 am

What should I do with my MiG-23s in my air force ?

Should I just sell them and buy more new aircaft, which I already have like the MiG-29,Su-27 and Su-30.

I was planning to replace them with some JF-17s, it that a good idea ?
Last edited by Yakzistan on Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Belakosarian Republic

(Formerly known as Yakzistan)

User avatar
Yakzistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 387
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakzistan » Thu Oct 30, 2014 7:01 am

Erusuia wrote:
Yakzistan wrote:What should I do with my MiG-23s in my air force ?

Should I just sell them and buy more new aircaft, which I already have like the MiG-29,Su-27 and Su-30.

I was planning to replace them with some JF-17s, it that a good idea ?


Depending on what model of MiG-23s they are, you could keep them in service along with your other aircraft or you could sell them to third world nation. Belorus sold its MiG-23s to the Sudan if I recall correctly

I would personally aim to acquire more Su-30s given that its a vastly superior aircraft compared to the MiG-29, Su-27 and JF-17 (the latter being a single engine light fighter more suitable for poor nations, and seeing as you operate Su-30s you're obviously not poor)

It all depends on what sort of threats you face


Thanks, The MiG-23s first arrived in my nation in 1978, so I guess I could keep using them and give some of them to reserve units later on and buy new aircraft.
The Belakosarian Republic

(Formerly known as Yakzistan)

User avatar
Yakzistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 387
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakzistan » Fri Apr 10, 2015 6:48 am

Opinions on having the E-2 Hawkeye as an AWACS aircraft?
The Belakosarian Republic

(Formerly known as Yakzistan)

User avatar
Yakzistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 387
Founded: Mar 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakzistan » Wed May 13, 2015 9:39 am

Thoughts on having the L-39ZA as COIN/poor man's tank killer?

We have the liscene to produce them and we're retiring the A-37 Dragonfly.

Any opinions about this
The Belakosarian Republic

(Formerly known as Yakzistan)

User avatar
Yodle
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 360
Founded: Mar 11, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Yodle » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:42 pm

Nonexistent, aside from transport aircraft such as cargo planes or helicopters.
SC #201
GAR #380
SC #218
Left Social Libertarian
Economic Left/Right: -5.68 (Mid 2016) to -6.30 (Jan. 2017) to -7.33 (May 2017) to -6.84 (August 2017)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69 (Mid 2016) to -4.32 (Jan. 2017) to -4.48 (May 2017) to -4.93 (August 2017)
Foreign Policy Stance: -4.99 (Mid 2016) to -6.13 (Jan. 2017) to -5.18 (May 2017) to -5.38 (August 2017) (Non-Interventionist)
Culture War Stance: -8.18 (Mid 2016) to -7.65 (Jan. 2017) to -6.95 (May 2017) to -8.22 (August 2017) (Cultural Liberal)
I am a millennial from New England, a supporter of Bernie Sanders, a self-described liberal and Democratic Socialist and currently a student attending college (with a major in Political Science).

User avatar
Ysoldia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Aug 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ysoldia » Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:28 am

Image
V1-45 Fighter Jets = 347

Image
CH-47 Helicopters = 66

Image
CH-47F Chinook Helicopters = 72

Image
AH-64A/D Apache Attack Helicopter = 89

Image
C-17 Globemaster III = 79

Image
Mi-171Sh Cargo Helicopters = 50

User avatar
Yugo-Austria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 565
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugo-Austria » Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:29 pm

Perhaps this is the wrong place to put this, but I have a question. I already know it's immoral and inhumane to do it but would it be plausible to remove the lower legs of all pilots to make it easier for them to fly? As in, there is less blood in their body, so while they are doing tricks less blood would flow to their head, right? Is this an idea that could work if put into practice?
pleaes God don't judge me for my previous posts i know it was cringe

User avatar
Yugo-Austria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 565
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugo-Austria » Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:49 pm

The Kievan People wrote:
Yugo-Austria wrote:Perhaps this is the wrong place to put this, but I have a question. I already know it's immoral and inhumane to do it but would it be plausible to remove the lower legs of all pilots to make it easier for them to fly? As in, there is less blood in their body, so while they are doing tricks less blood would flow to their head, right? Is this an idea that could work if put into practice?


The problem is not so much immoral as wouldn't do anything at all.

Blood is going from the heart to the brain, not from the legs. You black out because the force pulling the blood out of your head exceeds the force pushing new blood in. The heart does not start pumping harder because you lose your legs.

I just remember hearing about a pilot who had no legs and he was really good in WW2, so that's why I asked
pleaes God don't judge me for my previous posts i know it was cringe

User avatar
Yugoshvanka
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 136
Founded: Apr 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugoshvanka » Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:37 pm

Carrier borne Mig-19, can it be done?
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
The Soviet Union by any other name
This nation is 1950's-60's past tech

User avatar
Yugoslav Memes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1046
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugoslav Memes » Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:35 am

https://www.google.com/patents/US8020482

Has this been brought up before

If not can we make it a new spicy meme
Factbook - Trobojka

Shooting all the old people is a feasible and effective solution whenever your ideas meet some obstacles.

User avatar
Yugoslav Territories
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jan 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugoslav Territories » Wed May 18, 2016 11:59 am

The Air Force of the Federation of Yugoslavia: 250,000 strong

Equipment: 48 MiG-29SMTs, 24 Su-27s, 8 F/A-18D Hornets, 17 SU-25, 35 E-3 AWACS, 7 KC-10, 15 KC-35, 2 VFA-16s (Yugoslav Stealth Bomber development), 20 LRS-Bs, 100 F-22Bs, 22 Su-30s, and 164 other miscellaneous aircraft.
Organization: Five main airbases are located in Belgrade, Zagreb, Pristina, Skopje, and Novi Sad.
Key: AFFY (Air Force of the Federation of Yugoslavia), FDS (First Development Squadron), YFW (Yugoslav Fighter Wing), YGAS (Yugoslav Ground Attack Squadron), YSBW (Yugoslav Strategic Bomber Wing), YRS (Yugoslav Refueling Squadron), YRW (Yugoslav Refueling Wing), EEWW (Electronic Early Warning Wing), YGAW (Yugoslav Ground Attack Wing)

COMBAT COMMAND

AFFY Command BEL: 1st YFW (equipped with 25 F-22Bs), 2nd YFW (equipped with 27 MiG-29SMTs), 8th YFW (equipped with 16 Su-27s), 2nd YGAS (equipped with 7 Su-25s), 1st YSBW (equipped with 10 LRS-Bs).
AFFY Command ZAG: 3rd YFW (equipped with 25 F-22Bs), 4th YFW (equipped with 16 MiG-29SMTs), 5th YFS (equipped with 4 F/A-18Ds), 2nd YSBW (equipped with 10 LRS-Bs).
AFFY Command PRS: 6th YFW (equipped with 25 F-22Bs), 7th YFS (equipped with 8 Su-27s),
AFFY Command SKP: 10th YFW (equipped with 25 F-22Bs), 9th YGAW (equipped with 22 Su-30s), 1st FDS (equipped with 2 VFA-16s).
AFFY Command NVS: 1st YGAS (equipped with 8 Su-25s).

REFUELING COMMAND

AFFY Command BEL: 1st YRS (equipped with 7 KC-10s)
AFFY Command ZAB: 2nd YRW (equipped with 15 KC-35s)

ELECTRONIC EARLY WARNING COMMAND

AFFY Command ZAG: 10th EEWW (equipped with 12 E-3 AWACS)
AFFY Command BEL: 3rd EEWW (equipped with 12 E-3 AWACS)
AFFY Command PRS: 2nd EEWW (equipped with 11 E-3 AWACS)


The Air Defense Forces of the Federation of Yugoslavia: 25,000 strong

Equipment:
20 S-400, 1 S-500, 8 SA-15, 8 S-300, 12 R-25 Vulcan reserve forces, 300 Patriot SAM emplacements
14 air defense infantry battalions are operated by ADFFY (1000 strong)

Deployed at major airbases and reserve air bases throughout the country.

User avatar
Yuketobaniac
Diplomat
 
Posts: 649
Founded: May 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuketobaniac » Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:12 pm

Husseinarti wrote:F-22 is a total pussy magnet.

very much
Reblian civil war -Won
The Great War of geneviena 2014-Won
Eleventh Gilean war 2014-Won
The Bosakian Invasion of Daritii 2014-Withdrawl
World War I-Lost
Operation southern comfort 2015-Won
War On Ravon-Won
World war II-Lost
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

User avatar
Yuketobaniac
Diplomat
 
Posts: 649
Founded: May 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuketobaniac » Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:13 pm

Husseinarti wrote:
Licana wrote:
The only recently introduced aircraft that has a better track record in regards to this is the Gripen. Also, as an added bonus, both of the raptor's fatal crashes can be attributed to pilot error.

Stay jelly, bro. :>


Why didn't the 1.38933 BILLION lines of code save the pilots?!?!?!?!?!??!?!

F-22 FAILURE compared to S-47 SUPER FLANKER T-50


You sound like a typical hater always saying that discontinued fighters and testing fighters are better than a battle proven jet
Reblian civil war -Won
The Great War of geneviena 2014-Won
Eleventh Gilean war 2014-Won
The Bosakian Invasion of Daritii 2014-Withdrawl
World War I-Lost
Operation southern comfort 2015-Won
War On Ravon-Won
World war II-Lost
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

User avatar
Yuketobaniac
Diplomat
 
Posts: 649
Founded: May 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuketobaniac » Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:35 pm

Transnapastain wrote:
Yuketobaniac wrote:
You sound like a typical hater always saying that discontinued fighters and testing fighters are better than a battle proven jet


When was the F-22 battle proven? Did I miss a war with Russia?

it proven good bombing the living **** out of scumbags in syria
Reblian civil war -Won
The Great War of geneviena 2014-Won
Eleventh Gilean war 2014-Won
The Bosakian Invasion of Daritii 2014-Withdrawl
World War I-Lost
Operation southern comfort 2015-Won
War On Ravon-Won
World war II-Lost
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

User avatar
Yuketobaniac
Diplomat
 
Posts: 649
Founded: May 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuketobaniac » Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:36 pm

Licana wrote:Guns are obsolete anyway. :>

say that to the F-4's face in nam
Reblian civil war -Won
The Great War of geneviena 2014-Won
Eleventh Gilean war 2014-Won
The Bosakian Invasion of Daritii 2014-Withdrawl
World War I-Lost
Operation southern comfort 2015-Won
War On Ravon-Won
World war II-Lost
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

User avatar
Yuketobaniac
Diplomat
 
Posts: 649
Founded: May 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuketobaniac » Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:41 pm

Rhoderberg wrote:
Yuketobaniac wrote:say that to the F-4's face in nam

Vietnam was the exception, rather than the rule.

one of the reasons besides the f-4s cockpit vision and manuverability, it needed a gun, even the mig-21 had one for backup
Reblian civil war -Won
The Great War of geneviena 2014-Won
Eleventh Gilean war 2014-Won
The Bosakian Invasion of Daritii 2014-Withdrawl
World War I-Lost
Operation southern comfort 2015-Won
War On Ravon-Won
World war II-Lost
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 10:53 am

Would this be a good air force list of equipment, why or why not?

Aircraft:

-Tactical transport: C130J Hercules
-Strategic transport: Rented, A400M, or An-124 Ruslan
-Utility helicopter: AW101
-Attack helicopter: Ka-52 Hokum-B
-Fighter: F/A-18 Super Hornet
-Ground attack aircraft: A-10 TB II

Weapons:

25mm chain gun
40mm ground attack cannon
Squad or heavy machine gun (7.2mm or 14.4mm)
Any kind of underslung weapon. AA missiles, AG missiles, AS missiles, JDAMs, et cetera.
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 12:10 pm

Organized States wrote:
Yukonastan wrote:Would this be a good air force list of equipment, why or why not?

Aircraft:

-Tactical transport: C130J Hercules
-Strategic transport: Rented, A400M, or An-124 Ruslan
-Utility helicopter: AW101
-Attack helicopter: Ka-52 Hokum-B
-Fighter: F/A-18 Super Hornet
-Ground attack aircraft: A-10 TB II

Weapons:

25mm chain gun
40mm ground attack cannon

40mm seems a little much, but what ever floats your boat, I guess.
I wouldn't really use the F/A-18 as a primary fighter unless you were in a challenging environment (the Canadian Yukon or Finland's northern most areas) or you don't have access to the nicest runways. I would lean more towards the F-16E, the Typhoon, or the F-35A if you have nicer runways or more moderate climates. For CAS/Ground Attack, I would rather use a helicopter gunship (like the Ka-52s you already have).


40mm 'cause 30mm is sooo 1990's.
F/A18 'cause my nation is in a harsh environment as you describe it. And no, we don't have the nicest runways.
What's the main reason that you suggested the joint strike failure as a frontline fighter? The thing's slow, overweight, half-blind, and can't carry any significant weight for any significant time or range. And I blame the USMC for having made it that way.
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 12:16 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:So justify the weight that a 40mm cannon has compared to its 30mm variants.


More hitting power. More damage per shell. More useful submunitions. Lower rate of fire to compensate for reduced ammo capacity, and if skeletonized not too much heavier than the 30mm cannon.
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Fri May 30, 2014 12:19 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:
Yukonastan wrote:
More hitting power. More damage per shell. More useful submunitions. Lower rate of fire to compensate for reduced ammo capacity, and if skeletonized not too much heavier than the 30mm cannon.


You can use newer types of 30mm ammunition instead of using a big gun that fires really slow and weights more than most 30mm cannons.

I hope you don't try to use this for CAS.


Why not? Why not take an upengined 'Hawg and fit a larger cannon on it?
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ankuran, Cyber Duotona, German-Eurpean Union, Kimozaki, San Mercurio

Advertisement

Remove ads