Your Nation's Air Force Mark II:

[Walosia]

The Legionis Classis Aeria (Air force) of Walosia uses the following equipment

Fighter jet:

Constantine G3


Wtech Sophia


Pugnator


Attack Aircrafts:

Ryse 102


Brutus


Patrol and reconnaissance aicrafts:

X1 Silent Horse (stealth)


Silentium


KLM XB3 (transport)


Ulyssies X2


Helicopers

Y32 Vertibird


M27R (attack helicopter)


Centurionis de aeria (transport helicopter)


WM42


X42 Pompeii

[Imperializt Russia]

What role does a stealth commercial aircraft have, and why does a transport aircraft have "patrol" duties?

[Organized States]

Lead-in fighter trainer:
LM/KAI T-50 or BAE Hawk?

[Gallia-]

What role does a stealth commercial aircraft have, and why does a transport aircraft have "patrol" duties?

1) Commercial aircraft have been militarised for decades.

2) It's possibly an MPA, or perhaps an ALBM carrier.

[Triplebaconation]

[Gallia-]

Jaktflygplan?

[Triplebaconation]

jet

[Imperializt Russia]

What role does a stealth commercial aircraft have, and why does a transport aircraft have "patrol" duties?

1) Commercial aircraft have been militarised for decades.

2) It's possibly an MPA, or perhaps an ALBM carrier.

And how many of those have been stealth aircraft?

[Gallia-]

jet

t _ T

[Gallia-]

http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Saab_Sea_Fox

it gets bigger

[New Emphillon]

So, out of pure curiosity, and I know that this has been discussed before, but could someone explain to me why it is considered a bad idea to have an Su-47 in an air force on NS? I know that the aircraft was used just as a technology demonstrator for the Russian Air Force, but what are the other reasons?

[Purpelia]

http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Saab_Sea_Fox

it gets bigger

Is there any reason, any reason at all you could think of for a landlocked nation to justify having VTOL aircraft? I ask for my sake. Since that thing combines VTOL with SAAB and that means cool.

[Imperializt Russia]

So, out of pure curiosity, and I know that this has been discussed before, but could someone explain to me why it is considered a bad idea to have an Su-47 in an air force on NS? I know that the aircraft was used just as a technology demonstrator for the Russian Air Force, but what are the other reasons?

Because it never advanced beyond the tech demonstrator stage. This usually is not a good sign, for either the affordability, capabilities offered over existing aircraft, or actual failures of the design or shortfalls.

The Su-47's forward-swept wing concept is problematic, simplest description.

[Spirit of Hope]

http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Saab_Sea_Fox

it gets bigger

Is there any reason, any reason at all you could think of for a landlocked nation to justify having VTOL aircraft? I ask for my sake. Since that thing combines VTOL with SAAB and that means cool.

Shorter runways (if vtol/stol) so that if runways are attacked and damaged planes can continue to take off and land. West Germany looked at this for some planes right before the cold war ended, which then lend to there cancelation.

[Gallia-]

http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Saab_Sea_Fox

it gets bigger

Is there any reason, any reason at all you could think of for a landlocked nation to justify having VTOL aircraft? I ask for my sake. Since that thing combines VTOL with SAAB and that means cool.

Harrier was never built for naval purposes?

[Zeinbrad]

So. I'm wondering.

Most Ragon aircraft, fighter, air superiority and maybe attack aircraft,during and before the Gaian-Ragon war use a laser cannon, weighed about the weight of a 20mm autocannon.

So, how many of these Laser cannons that weight as much as a 20mm autocannon can and should be put on their aircraft?

[Purpelia]

So. I'm wondering.

Most Ragon aircraft, fighter, air superiority and maybe attack aircraft,during and before the Gaian-Ragon war use a laser cannon, weighed about the weight of a 20mm autocannon.

So, how many of these Laser cannons that weight as much as a 20mm autocannon can and should be put on their aircraft?

As many as the number of 20mm autocannons that you could put on the same aircraft.

[Zeinbrad]

So. I'm wondering.

Most Ragon aircraft, fighter, air superiority and maybe attack aircraft,during and before the Gaian-Ragon war use a laser cannon, weighed about the weight of a 20mm autocannon.

So, how many of these Laser cannons that weight as much as a 20mm autocannon can and should be put on their aircraft?

As many as the number of 20mm autocannons that you could put on the same aircraft.

Note, these are mainly Eastern (mostly Russian) based military jets.

And they kind of focus on their fighters being fast and maneuverable multi-purpose jets, air superiority being heavier and bulkier and attack aircraft to be good at running away.

[Purpelia]

As many as the number of 20mm autocannons that you could put on the same aircraft.

Note, these are mainly Eastern (mostly Russian) based military jets.

And they kind of focus on their fighters being fast and maneuverable multi-purpose jets, air superiority being heavier and bulkier and attack aircraft to be good at running away.

Unless you are in the 1950's before missiles become a thing one gun per aircraft is enough.

[Zeinbrad]

Note, these are mainly Eastern (mostly Russian) based military jets.

And they kind of focus on their fighters being fast and maneuverable multi-purpose jets, air superiority being heavier and bulkier and attack aircraft to be good at running away.

Unless you are in the 1950's before missiles become a thing one gun per aircraft is enough.

Okay.

Also, for the Charons, I'm going to use 25mm rotary railguns (35mm with Attack), terrible or good idea?

[Purpelia]

Unless you are in the 1950's before missiles become a thing one gun per aircraft is enough.

Okay.

Also, for the Charons, I'm going to use 25mm rotary railguns (35mm with Attack), terrible or good idea?

My advice is to look up real world aircraft on Wikipedia and come asking with questions about the specific details you do not understand afterward.

[Zeinbrad]

Okay.

Also, for the Charons, I'm going to use 25mm rotary railguns (35mm with Attack), terrible or good idea?

My advice is to look up real world aircraft on Wikipedia and come asking with questions about the specific details you do not understand afterward.

Which is everything.

[Purpelia]

My advice is to look up real world aircraft on Wikipedia and come asking with questions about the specific details you do not understand afterward.

Which is everything.

In that case, you literally should just clone a real world aircraft and go with that. Bottom line is that we simply can not explain everything to you.

[Zeinbrad]

Which is everything.

In that case, you literally should just clone a real world aircraft and go with that. Bottom line is that we simply can not explain everything to you.

B-but!

No, I understand.

[Purpelia]

In that case, you literally should just clone a real world aircraft and go with that. Bottom line is that we simply can not explain everything to you.

B-but!

No, I understand.

I won't speak falsehoods to you. It will take time and effort if you want to do these things right. And that is the reason why we can't do them for you. It would literally require us to set up an university grade lecture on the subject. Which none of us is qualified or has the time to do.

Still, not to discourage you, allow me to provide you with an encouraging example. Look at the date my account is registered. Roughly a week after that is when I started wanting to design a rifle. In fact, I wanted to design that specific rifle I ended up drawing. Remember that animated rifle I did? The cool one? That rendition is from the beginning of this year. So it only took me roughly 3.5 years to figure out how rifles work good enough to design one. So really, even though realistically aircraft are definitively more complex than rifles you should not worry. You'll get the hang of things in no time.