NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nation's Air Force Mark II:

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Britinthia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Britinthia » Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:47 pm

Twin vs sijgle vertical stabilisers. As far as I can tell from google, twin tail on an aircraft is better in pretty much every way, except maybe cost and complexity, however this seems to be a minor issue in itself. So why do EF typhoon and Rafale use a single tail, surely there must be some advantage?
I set out to create a nation based on few laws, and common sense. Then I realised people are half wits who will use any excuse to test the boundries, and no boundries would be anarchy. Britinthia now has red tape on a scale never before seen outside of the U.K.

Threat level:
Critical []
Severe []
Substantial [x]
Moderate []
Low []

User avatar
Britinthia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Britinthia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 4:37 am

The nosecones look good, only critisism would be to smooth out the straighter lines of the nose so they fit the rest pf the profile.

So I have built my Air Force and Fleet Air Arm back to the mid 50's. The AF has each aircraft in service for about 25-30 years, with various incarnations of each. The FAA however is getting new fighters every 14 years on average. Does that sound like a problem? I can explain it away with an over-inflated budget, however it seems like a rather quick turnover.
I set out to create a nation based on few laws, and common sense. Then I realised people are half wits who will use any excuse to test the boundries, and no boundries would be anarchy. Britinthia now has red tape on a scale never before seen outside of the U.K.

Threat level:
Critical []
Severe []
Substantial [x]
Moderate []
Low []

User avatar
Britinthia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Britinthia » Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:06 am

Padnak wrote:Going on advice I was given a few days ago, I was wondering a few things:

-what sort of aircraft should I be looking at for reconnaissance? (drones, ultra lights etc)
-cargo aircraft, what are some durable low cost ones?
-Its primary roles are territorial defense, counter insurgency, moving men and materials throughout Padnak
-Padnak is a vary large collection of jungle islands (the largest being the roughly the size of Vancouver Island)

My airforce


If I may, I would consider consolidating your current fleet and reducing the overall number of different types of aircraft. The only reason you wouldn't do this is if you were unable to afford new aircraft and needed to buy whatever cheap second hand rubbish that pops up.

As for your question, something like a Pilatus PC-7 or similar will be good for reconnaissance and will double up as CAS for your troops. Plus if it does find something of interest it can kill it there and then if required. Maybe a light helo or floatplane would be helpful too, given your countries geography.

For cargo you seem pretty sorted. If you absolutely need strategic transport get a couple of C-17s.
I set out to create a nation based on few laws, and common sense. Then I realised people are half wits who will use any excuse to test the boundries, and no boundries would be anarchy. Britinthia now has red tape on a scale never before seen outside of the U.K.

Threat level:
Critical []
Severe []
Substantial [x]
Moderate []
Low []

User avatar
Brotherhood of nod
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Mar 25, 2012
Corporate Police State

Postby Brotherhood of nod » Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:34 am

Stahn wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:
Why do you need a bigger gun?


yust what to now teoritical option to GAU-8/A yout for the fun of it

I suspect he believes it would make it more effective in a contemporary scenario but I don't believe the reason why the A-10 could be near its obsolescence (if it is) is because its gun is not powerful enough but rather that the plane would be too vulnerable against state of the art anti air units.

I believe it would still be very effective if used against nations or forces that do not have a very strong and advanced anti air capability and in the real world there are still many of those.

I also think that if there ever will be a war between military forces that are both rather advanced and capable that all cards will be off the table and military doctrine will need to be reevaluated as was always the case in the modern past when strong, advanced industrial nations went to open conflict against each other. Something that has not happened since WW2.

The Kievan People wrote:
Millorg wrote:what its biggest gun you can replace the GAU-8/A Avenger with in the a-10 airframe teorical and pratical


Why do you need a bigger gun?


some tink the GAU 8/A Avengers its not powerfull nuff to take down modern MBT like t-90 or m1m2 abrames or hard target.
use in senrario support troops with lose of gps satilite and/or high enemy ECM and sensor jammers, its hard if not inposible to jam the Avengers compare to JDAM

User avatar
Brznovia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Aug 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Brznovia » Thu Aug 11, 2016 5:27 am

As Brznovia is a post-Soviet nation, our military is mostly equipped with Russian-origin equipment. The Brznovian Air Force's primary role is in air defence and army co-operation. Brznovia is primarily concerned with self-defence against external threats, and does not maintain a strategic component to the BAF. A brief breakdown of the BAF's inventory by role follows.

Initial Training Aircraft:
PZL-130 Orlik turboprop trainer

Advanced Training Aircraft:
Aero L-39 Albatross
Yakovlev Yak-130 'Mitten'

Air Superiority:
Sukhoi SU-27 'Flanker'
Mikoyan MiG-29 'Fulcrum'

Tactical Bombing/Close Air Support:
Sukhoi SU-25 'Frogfoot'
Sukhoi SU-24 'Fencer'

Reconnaissance:
Ilyushin Il-20 'Coot'

Logistics:
Antonov An-24 'Coke'
Antonov An-12 'Cub'

C3/AWACS:
Beriev A-50 'Mainstay'

Rotary wing aircraft are the concern of the Brznovian Army and Brznovian Navy.

User avatar
Bulgar Rouge
Minister
 
Posts: 2406
Founded: Dec 08, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bulgar Rouge » Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:33 am

Just how efficient is the MiG-21bis in the ground attack role, assuming no guided munitions are used ? Is it capable of performing toss bombing without ground attack avionics ?

This nation does not reflect my RL views.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:I'm only saying that, well, even commies have reached the level of selling counterfeit and drugs in their storefronts, we can't be any less.

The Holy Therns wrote:Politicians make statements. It's their substitute for achievement.

User avatar
Bulgar Rouge
Minister
 
Posts: 2406
Founded: Dec 08, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bulgar Rouge » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:17 am

Organized States wrote:
Bulgar Rouge wrote:Just how efficient is the MiG-21bis in the ground attack role, assuming no guided munitions are used ? Is it capable of performing toss bombing without ground attack avionics ?

Umm, you might be able to do some kind of dive-bombing esque tactic with it (like the Syrian Air Force), but it won't be very effective when compared to more Multirole aircraft.

It's pretty good with rocket pods, but I'm more interested in dumb bombs...specifically if it is capable of toss bombing.

This nation does not reflect my RL views.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:I'm only saying that, well, even commies have reached the level of selling counterfeit and drugs in their storefronts, we can't be any less.

The Holy Therns wrote:Politicians make statements. It's their substitute for achievement.

User avatar
Bulgar Rouge
Minister
 
Posts: 2406
Founded: Dec 08, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bulgar Rouge » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:27 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Bulgar Rouge wrote:It's pretty good with rocket pods, but I'm more interested in dumb bombs...specifically if it is capable of toss bombing.

Toss bombing technically requires avionics, though those avionics may well be mechanical, as it was in postwar and early Cold War aircraft


Examples of such aircraft/usage ?

This nation does not reflect my RL views.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:I'm only saying that, well, even commies have reached the level of selling counterfeit and drugs in their storefronts, we can't be any less.

The Holy Therns wrote:Politicians make statements. It's their substitute for achievement.

User avatar
Bulgar Rouge
Minister
 
Posts: 2406
Founded: Dec 08, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bulgar Rouge » Mon Feb 15, 2016 3:20 pm

Has anyone made any research on the ELINT systems of later MiG-25 aircraft ? Particularly the Kub-3M. I've searched a lot but nothing specific came out as to what the capabilities of that hardware actually are.

This nation does not reflect my RL views.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:I'm only saying that, well, even commies have reached the level of selling counterfeit and drugs in their storefronts, we can't be any less.

The Holy Therns wrote:Politicians make statements. It's their substitute for achievement.

User avatar
Bulgar Rouge
Minister
 
Posts: 2406
Founded: Dec 08, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bulgar Rouge » Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:00 pm

Velkanika wrote:
Bulgar Rouge wrote:Has anyone made any research on the ELINT systems of later MiG-25 aircraft ? Particularly the Kub-3M. I've searched a lot but nothing specific came out as to what the capabilities of that hardware actually are.

Kub-3M is a side-looking airborne radar from the 70s that was found on MiG-25RBK Foxbat Bs. It's not found on the later models of Foxbats, but I haven't found anything on the specific capabilities.


That's as much as I found. I'm trying to figure out how good the MiG-25 is for reconnaissance.

This nation does not reflect my RL views.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:I'm only saying that, well, even commies have reached the level of selling counterfeit and drugs in their storefronts, we can't be any less.

The Holy Therns wrote:Politicians make statements. It's their substitute for achievement.

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Fri May 30, 2014 2:07 pm

Is the F5E a good, cost effective multirole aircraft?
Image
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Fri May 30, 2014 2:12 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Is the F5E a good, cost effective multirole aircraft?
(Image)

Yes, assuming you don't have the money to buy anything newer.

Then it is good for its price
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Fri May 30, 2014 8:23 pm

What would be a good but cheap ground attack aircraft? I'm stuck on the SU25
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:36 am

How about the F14?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Sat Jun 07, 2014 10:59 pm

Is the F14 a good fighter for its price?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:23 pm

Triplebaconation wrote:Someone's never seen Top Gun.

I want to, but I've never gotten to
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:17 am

Should I use these?
Image
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:19 am

Vassenor wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Should I use these?
(Image)


Kfirs are getting a bit long in the tooth, but I don't think there's that many issues.

Are they good?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:24 am

Is the drakken a good fighter for me to use?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:03 am

Oaledonia wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Is the drakken a good fighter for me to use?

Dude WTF, we need more info then that.

The Saab J35 Draken, would it be a good air supremacy fighter for me to use
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:13 am

Gallia- wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Is the drakken a good fighter for me to use?


Yes it's fine.

A bit old, though.

Can it dogfight we'll with modern fighters? I mean newer fighters like the F15?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:17 am

Gallia- wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Can it dogfight we'll with modern fighters? I mean newer fighters like the F15?


Not really, but it could probably give MiG-21 or something a run for its money.

Then should I just bite my tongue and pay that extra money for the grippen?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:21 am

Oaledonia wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Then should I just bite my tongue and pay that extra money for the grippen?

We have no idea what you'll be fighting.

I want to be able to at least go toe to toe with a mig 29
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:37 am

Gallia- wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Then should I just bite my tongue and pay that extra money for the grippen?


If you're going to fight F-15s, yeah definitely.

I've fought F35s, and my F5s failed miserably, though they did ok against mig 21s and we're good multi role :)
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

User avatar
Bulgaria-Serbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1323
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bulgaria-Serbia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:55 am

Gallia- wrote:
Bulgaria-Serbia wrote:Then should I just bite my tongue and pay that extra money for the grippen?


If you're going to fight F-15s, yeah definitely.

And I could use the older Drakens for strike aircraft?
"Today we move forward unto dawn"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Akelphia, GreatOceania, HarYan, Nachmere, Nadagua, New Demgeramath

Advertisement

Remove ads