NeuPolska wrote:Iltica wrote:Field-of-study-irrelevent history class won't shut up about how great meritocracy is and got me thinking. Is there any historically plausible way it could have existed into present day? And if it did, what would the test criteria be in a secular society? Most of the real world examples have them being scholars of religious texts it seems.
You could have leaders chosen by their peers in their field. Defense ministers chosen by generals, leaders chosen based on awards received and public approval as well as taking any service they'd done into account, and leave voting restricted to members of society with high IQs, etc. Plenty of room still left for corruption I suppose but oh well.
That honestly sounds more like a technocracy and potentially even a corporatist state, though an argument could be made that both of those or at the very least the former is technically a variation of meritocracy but whatever.