Zeinbrad wrote:M-56 Main Battle of Tank.
79,200
I hope this is a horrible joke.
Advertisement
by Oaledonia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:59 am
Zeinbrad wrote:M-56 Main Battle of Tank.
79,200
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military InfoUnder construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*
by Zeinbrad » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:01 am
by Oaledonia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:02 am
Zeinbrad wrote:The 79,200, I just picked a random number in my head.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military InfoUnder construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*
by Zeinbrad » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:05 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:10 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:13 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Immoren » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:14 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:17 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Immoren » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:42 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:You could, as I was proposing for the overpressure 152 gun, but it's additional complexity, unless you retain a human loader who's used to two-piece ammunition loading.
You could always strap a small propellant bag to the projectile and then manufacture a larger "primary" propellant bag to retain two-piece rather than three-piece ammunition.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:40 am
Questers wrote:is there a reason why i sohuldnt give tank crews a headrest on their chair?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:42 am
by Ea90 » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:44 am
Questers wrote:is there a reason why i sohuldnt give tank crews a headrest on their chair?
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:51 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Kouralia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:02 am
by Anemos Major » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:03 am
San-Silvacian wrote:AMX-10RC > NS
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Ragnarum » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:26 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:33 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Stahn » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:33 am
Do you have an IC conflict with nations that are of equal or larger size?Ragnarum wrote:Right, so because I'm a military centred nation with 4.57 billion people, I have a ridiculously big army of 25-7 million strong that is also mainly tank based.
How many of either of these tanks do you think Ragnarum would have?
Also, which one would be the best option? Or are they too similar to be different tanks? Because that's what I've been thinking.
by Oaledonia » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:35 am
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military InfoUnder construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*
by Ragnarum » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:41 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm not really sure that being a "tank based" army is very good.
Almost every force is infantry based for a reason. Infantry are mainline do-everything units. Tanks are heavy supporting arms that are good at breaking lines and being supporting arms.
Stahn wrote:Do you have an IC conflict with nations that are of equal or larger size?Ragnarum wrote:Right, so because I'm a military centred nation with 4.57 billion people, I have a ridiculously big army of 25-7 million strong that is also mainly tank based.
How many of either of these tanks do you think Ragnarum would have?
Also, which one would be the best option? Or are they too similar to be different tanks? Because that's what I've been thinking.
If not why not cap your population?
I would do it if I didn't have that many enemies that are een larger than me and do the opposite of capping.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Indo States, Shearoa, The Republic of Western Sol
Advertisement