NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread #5

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Thread Author #6 Poll

Questers
41
34%
Gallia-/Kampala-
12
10%
Velkanika
8
7%
The Kievan People/Kyiv
29
24%
The Akasha Colony
5
4%
Spirit of Hope
4
3%
Lamoni
5
4%
Lyras
10
8%
Lubyak
5
4%
 
Total votes : 119

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:01 pm

Much. See the level of the ground for the Tulip?
That's a baseplate jammed into the ground. It's surprisingly deep.
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Quadbikes can be hefty. Under UK road law, a "light" quad bike is "up to" 350kg unladen.
Heavier examples can be "up to" 400kg unladen, or 550kg if "designed for carrying goods" (which may or may not include its trailer).

A half ton is a lot of cargo capacity, and I don't think you'd be getting away with much less than a Huey. An MH-6 could lift that, but at the expense of its pilots or fuel.
Soviet mechanised formations featured GMG and ATGM platoons at that level.


Do not underestimate MH-6s. The nasty fuckers WILL get you, either by a 6-man lodrag squads or this

Image

EDIT: I think I got the perfect air assault platoon figured out :lol:

3x MH-6 , each w/ 6 man dismount squad
1x AH-6 , w/ platoon commander & 2ic as pilot and copilot, for command and fire support

y/y

An MH-6 has a "useful load" of less than 700kg. Its two pilots plus a large quad and trailer will preclude any fuel weight.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65243
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:02 pm

Krazeria wrote:
Kouralia wrote:This is an example of a 240mm mortar:
Image
So, in a way... No.

Tyulpan is best to look at for what is closer to a SPG than things like 120mm mortars.



hummm, how much recoil does a mortar produce?

Depends on mortar.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Krazeria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Krazeria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:06 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Krazeria wrote:

hummm, how much recoil does a mortar produce?

Depends on the size. I believe less than a similarly sized actual gun, but a 350mm mortar is still going to be huge.


whats the biggest mortar that could be internally carried? (ei not requiring a massive base plate)
It could always use more missiles!

RP stats
Population: 954,000,000 Military: 1,304,900 GDP: 7.9 trillion Tech Level: Modern Tech

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:07 pm

Krazeria wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Depends on the size. I believe less than a similarly sized actual gun, but a 350mm mortar is still going to be huge.


whats the biggest mortar that could be internally carried? (ei not requiring a massive base plate)

Inside an APC? Probably ~120mm.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
Ea90
Senator
 
Posts: 3990
Founded: Aug 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ea90 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:10 pm


User avatar
Krazeria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Krazeria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:13 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Krazeria wrote:
whats the biggest mortar that could be internally carried? (ei not requiring a massive base plate)

Inside an APC? Probably ~120mm.


I was thinking of a designated mortar carrier based off the chassis of a main battle tank
It could always use more missiles!

RP stats
Population: 954,000,000 Military: 1,304,900 GDP: 7.9 trillion Tech Level: Modern Tech

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:16 pm



dats crazy bro.

Anyhow. Google Drive is fucking amazing. Imagine creating storefronts with Forms tied to Spreadsheets. Holy fuck. It's like Access and Excel without all the headaches, and with the cloud bit figured out from the get go.

Brb.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:17 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Krazeria wrote:
whats the biggest mortar that could be internally carried? (ei not requiring a massive base plate)

Inside an APC? Probably ~120mm.

The Israelis jammed a Soltam into a... a thing.
Image
Unsurprisingly, the Makmat is a Sherman. Was.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65243
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:17 pm

Krazeria wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Inside an APC? Probably ~120mm.


I was thinking of a designated mortar carrier based off the chassis of a main battle tank

IIRC 160mm.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:19 pm

Immoren wrote:
Krazeria wrote:
I was thinking of a designated mortar carrier based off the chassis of a main battle tank

IIRC 160mm.


205mm howitzer in casemate , based on <100T heavy tank ?
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:21 pm

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Immoren wrote:IIRC 160mm.


205mm howitzer in casemate , based on <100T heavy tank ?

We're talking about mortars.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:26 pm

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Immoren wrote:IIRC 160mm.


205mm howitzer in casemate , based on <100T heavy tank ?

There's probably a reason why eight inch self propelled pieces haven't been common.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65243
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:30 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
205mm howitzer in casemate , based on <100T heavy tank ?

There's probably a reason why eight inch self propelled pieces haven't been common.


Because you can't maintain fast enough rof for consistent suppression? :p
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Krazeria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Krazeria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:40 pm

Immoren wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:There's probably a reason why eight inch self propelled pieces haven't been common.


Because you can't maintain fast enough rof for consistent suppression? :p


The krazerian army has rocket artillery for medium range saturation attacks, spgs for long range support of armored forces, and mortars for close range fire support
It could always use more missiles!

RP stats
Population: 954,000,000 Military: 1,304,900 GDP: 7.9 trillion Tech Level: Modern Tech

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:41 pm

CREDIT GOES TO ANEMOS MAJOR

Here's an example of what can be done.. (remember to choose IFV) a little form to buy Anemos' MA9A2

Which shows up nicely like so
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:00 pm

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:CREDIT GOES TO ANEMOS MAJOR

Here's an example of what can be done.. (remember to choose IFV) a little form to buy Anemos' MA9A2

Which shows up nicely like so

Have you just accidentally made me buy an MA9A2 (SPGM) with a 30mm autocannon?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24942
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:03 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:CREDIT GOES TO ANEMOS MAJOR

Here's an example of what can be done.. (remember to choose IFV) a little form to buy Anemos' MA9A2

Which shows up nicely like so

Have you just accidentally made me buy an MA9A2 (SPGM) with a 30mm autocannon?

I wonder the same regarding the CBRNRV.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:CREDIT GOES TO ANEMOS MAJOR

Here's an example of what can be done.. (remember to choose IFV) a little form to buy Anemos' MA9A2

Which shows up nicely like so

Have you just accidentally made me buy an MA9A2 (SPGM) with a 30mm autocannon?


(remember to choose IFV)


I was too lazy to do it for all variants, but it is doable. You need the storefront, if you have that already figured out, this is more or less a piece of cake. And yes it can be done so that it both looks good and is functional showing all sales clearly with well organized details.

E: Give it a try, I'm sure you'll figure it out in no time, if you're interested that is..

But really, GDocs is groundbreaking. Before this to be able to do the same thing you'd rip your hair out trying to get Access to work like you wanted it to ( for me at least :lol: ), and that's not even going into the "cloud" bit.

E2: Unless I completely missed an online (and free) service capable of doing that.
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:18 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:32 pm

For my mechanized infantry who ride in IFVs that pretty much have the armament of a BMP-3 (100mm gun, 30mm autocannon) do away with man-portable AT weapons altogether Y/N?
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12090
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:37 pm

Anacasppia wrote:For my mechanized infantry who ride in IFVs that pretty much have the armament of a BMP-3 (100mm gun, 30mm autocannon) do away with man-portable AT weapons altogether Y/N?

Why get rid of the weapon? The vehicle will be able to carry better/heavier weapons than the infantry and more ammo to boot. There would be little point to removing it.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:42 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Anacasppia wrote:For my mechanized infantry who ride in IFVs that pretty much have the armament of a BMP-3 (100mm gun, 30mm autocannon) do away with man-portable AT weapons altogether Y/N?

Why get rid of the weapon? The vehicle will be able to carry better/heavier weapons than the infantry and more ammo to boot. There would be little point to removing it.

?
I meant that since the 100mm gun would provide significant anti-tank capability through GLATGM, perhaps the infantry could do away with their own MANPATs or leave them in the vehicles unless the situation calls for it (built-up areas, maybe).
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
Riysa
Senator
 
Posts: 4448
Founded: Jan 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riysa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:59 pm

Anacasppia wrote:For my mechanized infantry who ride in IFVs that pretty much have the armament of a BMP-3 (100mm gun, 30mm autocannon) do away with man-portable AT weapons altogether Y/N?


Big No here to be honest. MANPATGMs can and often outperform GLATGMs. Just compare the Bastion (550-750 mm RHAe after ERA depending on model) to even an RPG-29 or RPG-32 (750mm RHAe after ERA), let alone something such as a newer generation MILAN (~880mm RHAe after ERA) or the Metis-M (950mm after RHAe). Even the Refleks missile for the 125mm only gets about 900mm RHAe after ERA.

GLATGMs are good at improving vehicle firepower, but can't outperform MANPADATGMs or the like.

User avatar
Lubyak
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9339
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Lubyak » Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:01 pm

Anacasppia wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:Why get rid of the weapon? The vehicle will be able to carry better/heavier weapons than the infantry and more ammo to boot. There would be little point to removing it.

?
I meant that since the 100mm gun would provide significant anti-tank capability through GLATGM, perhaps the infantry could do away with their own MANPATs or leave them in the vehicles unless the situation calls for it (built-up areas, maybe).


The GLATGM of a BMP-3 and the man carried AT weapons are very different types of weapon. The ATGM is a long ranged weapon, while the hand carried ones are meant to be short range and carried with the infantry forward. Also, it'd be bad as if the IFV is taken out your squad will loos all it's AT capability. Keeping them with hand carried AT weapons will at least keep them capable of destroying vehicles. Also, hand carried AT weapons tend to be useful for more general use, as you can change the warhead from AT to things like HE, thermobaric, smoke, etc. and other things which are useful to have around.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:02 pm

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Have you just accidentally made me buy an MA9A2 (SPGM) with a 30mm autocannon?


(remember to choose IFV)


I was too lazy to do it for all variants, but it is doable. You need the storefront, if you have that already figured out, this is more or less a piece of cake. And yes it can be done so that it both looks good and is functional showing all sales clearly with well organized details.

E: Give it a try, I'm sure you'll figure it out in no time, if you're interested that is..

But really, GDocs is groundbreaking. Before this to be able to do the same thing you'd rip your hair out trying to get Access to work like you wanted it to ( for me at least :lol: ), and that's not even going into the "cloud" bit.

E2: Unless I completely missed an online (and free) service capable of doing that.

I'm so using this the next time I make something that's worthwhile selling.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:17 pm

Primordial Luxa wrote:Do any of you have suggestions for organizing these unassigned unit?
How many should I have, what type?
They are organised into hundreds of independent companies or battalions or else assigned to bases, detachments, or are on loan from a pool. You don't organise them. You're doing it wrong, basically.
Restore the Crown

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Ocalla, Slavatania

Advertisement

Remove ads