Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs) [Part 1]

by **Amerikians** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:45 am

Auman wrote:Hey gaiz, insted of tanks i hav robuts there bettar then tanks cuz teh armur is thikker and it haz legs. chek it out.

So what happens when I stick blocks of C-4 on the knee joints and blow the legs to hell? Not so badass now is it? Seriously though people before the Mods come back: Enough with the Mecha.

by **Willman** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:20 pm

Amerikians wrote:
Auman wrote:Hey gaiz, insted of tanks i hav robuts there bettar then tanks cuz teh armur is thikker and it haz legs. chek it out.

So what happens when I stick blocks of C-4 on the knee joints and blow the legs to hell? Not so badass now is it? Seriously though people before the Mods come back: Enough with the Mecha.

Learn2Sarcasm. Really, Really obvious sarcasm.

by **Austria-russia** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:20 am

We have a new tank!

capable of piercing the thickest armour their is and well defended itself, this tank rules the battlefield with state of the art technology

by **The Anglo-Saxon Empire** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:31 am

Austria-russia wrote:We have a new tank!

capable of piercing the thickest armour their is and well defended itself, this tank rules the battlefield with state of the art technology

Can you explain how it can pierce the thickest tank armour (like the frontal arc of the MCA-7E), or armour that can survive a hit from a Lyran 140mm gun? Also I probably could kill your multi-million dollar tank with a Lyran Iron Heart ATGM platform which only costs around 5.5 million.

by **Austria-russia** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:33 am

labour is cheap, we have very long range, rounds are AP with explosives timed to go off in 0.5 seconds of impact thereby killing all the enemy occupants

by **The Anglo-Saxon Empire** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:37 am

Austria-russia wrote:labour is cheap, we have very long range, rounds are AP with explosives timed to go off in 0.5 seconds of impact thereby killing all the enemy occupants

A high explosive round won't be able to kill anything newer than a T-72 if that even, let alone a modern MBT. Also can you explain how your gun has such a long range?

by **Central Slavia** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:39 am

Our main tank is the T72M4
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7806 ... 4czrh3.jpg

We are also using T80 but mostly as a front to the attack in lower numbers and as the tank for the leaders due to the better protection

by **Senestrum** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:43 am

Austria-russia wrote:labour is cheap, we have very long range, rounds are AP with explosives timed to go off in 0.5 seconds of impact thereby killing all the enemy occupants

The problem is penetrating it in the first place. High-end NS MBTs have absolutely fucktarded amounts of armor, so you would need an absolutely lulzy gun to penetrate the crew compartment from the frontal arc.

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:A high explosive round won't be able to kill anything newer than a T-72 if that even, let alone a modern MBT. Also can you explain how your gun has such a long range?

That's actually something of a myth; high explosives do just fine disabling all those extremely important bits that are, by necessity, outside the armor.

by **Central Slavia** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:45 am

What about HESH heads ? you in the west found them quite popular - if the tank has no spaced armour it will die due to shockwave inside breaking electronics

by **Lowell Leber** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:47 am

Austria-russia wrote:We have a new tank!

capable of piercing the thickest armour their is and well defended itself, this tank rules the battlefield with state of the art technology

This 'tank' looks like a piece of self propelled artillery.

by **Hegstoria** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:52 am

Lowell Leber wrote:
Austria-russia wrote:We have a new tank!

capable of piercing the thickest armour their is and well defended itself, this tank rules the battlefield with state of the art technology

This 'tank' looks like a piece of self propelled artillery.

Odd, right...

by **Central Slavia** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:54 am

IT is a propaganda device - imagine how scared and surprised will the enemy soldiers be when they see as SP artillery turn the turret around!

by **Senestrum** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:57 am

Bah. If he's going to use an artillery piece as a tank, he should at least use one that's not a toy.

by **The Genocidal Daleks** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:10 am

Exterminate!

by **Chernobyl-Pripyat** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:20 am

Test models will undergo trials beginning in summer, will feature either a 2A66 ETC gun, or a 152mm ETC gun. Compared to the T-100A tank currently in front line service, this will be the "quantity" tank, but will have superior control systems and battle management network as a standard.

by **Satirius** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:29 am

Senestrum wrote:Bah. If he's going to use an artillery piece as a tank, he should at least use one that's not a toy.

Armed with W48 shells.

Honestly, the only land vehicle IRL that can take out an NS-grade tank is a 155mm SPH with a fucktard in it using it as an assault gun.

by **Senestrum** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:42 am

If he gets lucky and hits it from the side, yes.

by **United Russian State** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:50 am

Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Test models will undergo trials beginning in summer, will feature either a 2A66 ETC gun, or a 152mm ETC gun. Compared to the T-100A tank currently in front line service, this will be the "quantity" tank, but will have superior control systems and battle management network as a standard.

There goes the rest of my tank divsions. :palm:

Unless if you mean RL summer, than there is hope yet!

by **Chernobyl-Pripyat** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:03 am

Yes, RL summer xD

I have to figure out how to make a turretless tank work, though if the real T-95 is going to be like that it will probably be like the BMPT and have a function similar to that.

by **Dostanuot Loj** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:20 pm

Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Yes, RL summer xD

I have to figure out how to make a turretless tank work, though if the real T-95 is going to be like that it will probably be like the BMPT and have a function similar to that.

Not hard, the Americans, Jordanians, and many others already have them. Look up the KADDB Falcon turret series.

by **Hurtful Thoughts** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:50 pm

Lowell Leber wrote:
Austria-russia wrote:We have a new tank!

capable of piercing the thickest armour their is and well defended itself, this tank rules the battlefield with state of the art technology
This 'tank' looks like a piece of self propelled artillery.

You mean the leather chair on tracks photo-bombing the pic?

@Senstrum: Turret and hull roof, most likely can be penetrated via 81 mm gun-mortar shells at such ridiculous ranges...

Anyways, Smerch vs Tank.

Okay, nuclear smerch vs nuclear tank.

Eah of my divisions are equiped with about four dozen 'heavy tanks' exceeding twenty tons.

Of which, only a half-dozen exceed 80 tons, by jumping to that other extreme of 650 metric tons of love.

by **Miyager** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:09 pm

by **Lowell Leber** » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:51 pm

HT-22

Primary Armament: 120mm Rifled Gun L30 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L30

A domestically produced model of the Rusikstan RT-22. Thanks to Rusikstan Armaments!http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=26422

by **Sharfghotten** » Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:00 pm

S-21 MBT.

Standard pattern S-21: note the black symbol of the Capital Guard Division

Well, these will EVENTUALLY be the MAIN battle tank- they are still in the phase-in process.

http://z4.invisionfree.com/NSDraftroom/index.php?showtopic=7714

by **New Immortallia** » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:24 pm

Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs) [Part 1]

Who is online