Still looks the same to me...
Turret, right? Try looking at the difference between the Leo 2 and Leo 2 A7 to see what I'm talking about.
Advertisement

by Anemos Major » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:46 pm
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Rusikstan » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:47 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Licana » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:50 pm
Minnysota wrote:Question, how well would a K2 do against the LY4A2?
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Minnysota » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:51 pm

by Anemos Major » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:53 pm
Rusikstan wrote:I don't see exactly what you sloped, but I say keep it like it is.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by St George of England » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:55 pm
Minnysota wrote:Question, how well would a K2 do against the LY4A2?

by Rusikstan » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:57 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.
by Minnysota » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:58 pm
Rusikstan wrote:Licana wrote:It would fail...what kind of question is that?
Its acually a good question. Why it would "fail" yes as its armor hasn't been NS'ifed nor its gun NS'ifed nor its system NS'ifed. However its like a build up to that level. The K2 has some pretty nice systems that unless you wank the crap out of can not get too much better. K2, afaik, is pretty cutting edge for tank tech today, but against a known NS super tank....
of course sumer can probably come in and set the record straight, same conclusion but better explained.

by Licana » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:59 pm
Rusikstan wrote:Licana wrote:It would fail...what kind of question is that?
Its acually a good question. Why it would "fail" yes as its armor hasn't been NS'ifed nor its gun NS'ifed nor its system NS'ifed. However its like a build up to that level. The K2 has some pretty nice systems that unless you wank the crap out of can not get too much better. K2, afaik, is pretty cutting edge for tank tech today, but against a known NS super tank....
of course sumer can probably come in and set the record straight, same conclusion but better explained.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Western Weyard » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:00 pm
Rusikstan wrote:I don't see exactly what you sloped, but I say keep it like it is.
Anemos Major wrote:Still looks the same to me...
Turret, right? Try looking at the difference between the Leo 2 and Leo 2 A7 to see what I'm talking about.
Mefpan wrote:I'd rather have them throw the region into shit zone than have Erdogan strap rocket boosters to his country and Wernher von Braun it there and damn the obstacles.

by Rusikstan » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:04 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Dystopianus » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:07 pm
"Lynx" sounds nice too. I like Lynxes.The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Greater United Russia wrote:
Ford doesn't mean to float, it simply means to cross. That's one drown out engine and crew but sure; you can drive a Leo through 9 feet of water.
Never said it did, I just meant that if water going meant it could float than there is no water going variant.
Also, I need a nickname for my medium tank/ main battle tank (ICly it is referred to as a medium tank, but doctrine wise it is more of an MBT). Any suggestions? I am leaning more towards aggressive mammals, or some kind of heavy cavalry, so wolverine, or cataphract or something. Probably going to use a similar naming type for my other vehicles, so if my MBT is called the wolverine, I might nickname my artillery gun elephants, and my IFVs Tiger or lion, or bear (or Liger).
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Have you ever been in a battle where trained war kittens were unleashed on the field? Have you heard the screams of the dying as their faces were chewed off by adorable, yet deadly, swarms of kittens? No. No. You have no idea of the terror which a trained kitten squad can inflict, the horror and madness as the wall of fluffy death closes on you. I have been, I have seen. The art of the Kittenmeister is a truly terrible thing to behold


by Rusikstan » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:25 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by St George of England » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:28 pm
Minnysota wrote:Another question regarding the K2, how does it do in battle against a Leo 2A7?

by Balova » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:30 pm

by Licana » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:30 pm
Balova wrote:Balova has recently taken possession of sexual M1A1 MBTs, a fortuitous decision. Military authorities are also hurriedly refurbishing M103 heavy tanks.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Western Weyard » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:31 pm
Rusikstan wrote:Isn't the plural of lynx...lynx? You know like moose.
Also W. Weyard I think I see the difference, but the difference is not that attention grabbing so I guess its whatever version you like better.
Mefpan wrote:I'd rather have them throw the region into shit zone than have Erdogan strap rocket boosters to his country and Wernher von Braun it there and damn the obstacles.

by Rusikstan » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:37 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Licana » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:38 pm
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by St George of England » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:39 pm
Rusikstan wrote:St George of England wrote:Depends.
I want to think the K2 will probably beat Leo2A7+. I don't know much of the A7, but its mostly survival increases. I think the K2 will have it in the electronic aspects, but that is only one aspect. Most other things will be roughly equal.
Really though as George stated it depends. Crew will mean everything with such a closeness in ability. Also keep in mind I know very little about the A7.


by Cartavesqa » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:44 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Candesia
Advertisement