If I may ask, what makes the K-2 so awesome? I honestly know nothing about it.
Advertisement

by Licana » Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:41 pm
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Inutoland » Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:48 pm


by Senestrum » Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:43 pm

by United States of PA » Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:45 pm

by Rusikstan » Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:53 pm
United States of PA wrote:Roan, you never answered my question about if i would be able to use your Super APFSDS whenever you get it out.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Wikipedia and Universe » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:12 pm
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.

by United States of PA » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:15 pm

by Zeth Rekia » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:18 pm
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?

by Licana » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:21 pm
Zeth Rekia wrote:Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?
I heard it is has 6 cannons.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Dinosaurana » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:25 pm
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?
Amerikians wrote:
Thank you sentient lizard with more awesome than Darth Vader.

by Sucrati » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:36 pm
Zeth Rekia wrote:Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?
I heard it is has 6 cannons.
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

by Dostanuot Loj » Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:40 pm
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?
by Minnysota » Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:45 pm
Dostanuot Loj wrote:Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?
I read a GD press brief on the program a month ago. Which I believe makes me most qualified and most informed on the actual program here.
Anyway, all it said was incremental improvements for the current threat environment. Which I figure means M1A2TUSK +1, new build instead of refit. So it's not going to be anything super.

by Bajireyn » Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:59 pm
Minnysota wrote:Dostanuot Loj wrote:
I read a GD press brief on the program a month ago. Which I believe makes me most qualified and most informed on the actual program here.
Anyway, all it said was incremental improvements for the current threat environment. Which I figure means M1A2TUSK +1, new build instead of refit. So it's not going to be anything super.
No engines that are less fuel-consuming?

by Powys-Gwent » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:13 pm

Radictistan wrote:The use of death squads to eliminate dangerous, anti-democratic activists is morally justifiable. You can't defend liberty without breaking a few skulls.

by Dostanuot Loj » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:18 pm

by Rusikstan » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:31 pm
Dostanuot Loj wrote:Wikipedia and Universe wrote:Does anyone know of any concrete conceptions of the apparently-uber-classified developing M1A3? I've heard some minor speculation, but no solid plans or even in-depth speculation. I can't even find concept art. Any speculation or maybe even solid knowledge? Sumer? Senestrum? Anyone?
I read a GD press brief on the program a month ago. Which I believe makes me most qualified and most informed on the actual program here.
Anyway, all it said was incremental improvements for the current threat environment. Which I figure means M1A2TUSK +1, new build instead of refit. So it's not going to be anything super.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Dostanuot Loj » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:33 pm
Rusikstan wrote:Dostanuot Loj wrote:
I read a GD press brief on the program a month ago. Which I believe makes me most qualified and most informed on the actual program here.
Anyway, all it said was incremental improvements for the current threat environment. Which I figure means M1A2TUSK +1, new build instead of refit. So it's not going to be anything super.
To make sure I understand you, they are going to be actually building new everything instead of just spitshinning older models until new?

by Rusikstan » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:39 pm
Dostanuot Loj wrote:Rusikstan wrote:
To make sure I understand you, they are going to be actually building new everything instead of just spitshinning older models until new?
Who knows?
US tank forces are capped by congress. The only way they're going to be building new is if they get rid of older Abrams. Which is a strong possibility (Iraq wants some, among others).
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement