Advertisement

by Deceptionia » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:10 pm

by Alternate Russia » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:16 pm
Deceptionia wrote:In the little time I have been here, I have seen much of the tanks posted here. I would love to post what type of tank thing I have, but you have a strict no mech rule on this thread (boy, I wish I didn't have to use mechs, but damn it I shall!). Can anyone give me a link to a mecha thread? I can't seem to find one.

by Noders » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:18 pm
Deceptionia wrote:In the little time I have been here, I have seen much of the tanks posted here. I would love to post what type of tank thing I have, but you have a strict no mech rule on this thread (boy, I wish I didn't have to use mechs, but damn it I shall!). Can anyone give me a link to a mecha thread? I can't seem to find one.
most of the time people post it any ways and then try to justify it your the first to ask for the other thread

Socialdemokraterne wrote:Noders: Only the finest books and pizza. And books about pizza. Not so much their book-flavored pizzas, though.

by Deceptionia » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:24 pm
Noders wrote:Deceptionia wrote:In the little time I have been here, I have seen much of the tanks posted here. I would love to post what type of tank thing I have, but you have a strict no mech rule on this thread (boy, I wish I didn't have to use mechs, but damn it I shall!). Can anyone give me a link to a mecha thread? I can't seem to find one.
wow you are a true newbie (the good kind of course)![]()
most of the time people post it any ways and then try to justify it your the first to ask for the other thread
![]()


by Deceptionia » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:24 pm
Alternate Russia wrote:Deceptionia wrote:In the little time I have been here, I have seen much of the tanks posted here. I would love to post what type of tank thing I have, but you have a strict no mech rule on this thread (boy, I wish I didn't have to use mechs, but damn it I shall!). Can anyone give me a link to a mecha thread? I can't seem to find one.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=80426&hilit=Mech+Thread

by Bajireyn » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:28 pm
Deceptionia wrote:Noders wrote:wow you are a true newbie (the good kind of course)![]()
most of the time people post it any ways and then try to justify it your the first to ask for the other thread
![]()
Why people justify mechas in a tank thread is beyond me. Tanks are at the complete advantage, IMO, unless the mecha can bring itself down to its level (which is why my mechs could probably stand a slim chance). Tanks in numbers against a few mechs will most likely win. Just giving you proof I'm not a total mecha n00b


by The Kievan People » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:21 pm




by Kiribait » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:31 pm

by -the Ukrainian SSR- » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:33 pm

by Sucrati » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:36 pm


George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

by United States of PA » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:43 pm
Kiribait wrote:Since most modern tanks have a turret which doesn't extend to the main hull. If you where to be good enough (and to have the turret facing the other direction) and got it between the turret and the hull, wouldn't you strike the like tube (I'm not exactly sure whats it called but Im not a tank expert to begin with) thing that holds the turret, Wouldn't that just break into the main body thus killing the crew and such?

by Hiijaric Monarchy » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:45 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Sneaking up on tanks is for sissies and girls.
Real men run straight up to it and shove a block of C4 down the barrel.

by Khazyan » Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:59 pm

by Rusikstan » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:02 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Sneaking up on tanks is for sissies and girls.
Real men run straight up to it and shove a block of C4 down the barrel.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:10 pm
Rusikstan wrote:The Kievan People wrote:Sneaking up on tanks is for sissies and girls.
Real men run straight up to it and shove a block of C4 down the barrel.
That is not fair! The tank had a broken track and couldn't run his ass over!
Point being:
Real Men, apparently, kick tigers when they are down instead of when they can actually do something.

by Sciox » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:31 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Rusikstan wrote:
That is not fair! The tank had a broken track and couldn't run his ass over!
Point being:
Real Men, apparently, kick tigers when they are down instead of when they can actually do something.
Well no duh, how are you supposed to catch an armoured vehicle traveling at high speeds? Besides the tank commander has an MG, and probably a pistol or something.
Travda wrote:We had a recent incident where our WA Representative pulled out a shotgun in the Assembly's chamber. Foreign Minister Karakov was...unprepared for meeting Artorrios o SouthWoods, the Chairbear of the Bears Armed Mission to the WA . Karakov, seeing the ursine delegate for the first time, mistook him for an actual bear. So he did what any person would do when confronted with a bear in the middle of an international meeting; he tried to shoot him.
Lucky for all of us, Karakov is a lousy shot.
North Defese wrote:The soldier, being a patriot, would spontaniously explode from being touched by filthy foreigners.

by Hiijaric Monarchy » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:32 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Rusikstan wrote:
That is not fair! The tank had a broken track and couldn't run his ass over!
Point being:
Real Men, apparently, kick tigers when they are down instead of when they can actually do something.
Well no duh, how are you supposed to catch an armoured vehicle traveling at high speeds? Besides the tank commander has an MG, and probably a pistol or something.

by Hiijaric Monarchy » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:34 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Real tank commanders would probably ditch and book it as soon as they discover they are immobile

by United States of PA » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:36 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Real tank commanders would probably ditch and book it as soon as they discover they are immobile

by Sucrati » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:41 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Real tank commanders would probably ditch and book it as soon as they discover they are immobile
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

by Rusikstan » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:47 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Rusikstan wrote:That is not fair! The tank had a broken track and couldn't run his ass over!
Point being:
Real Men, apparently, kick tigers when they are down instead of when they can actually do something.
Well no duh, how are you supposed to catch an armoured vehicle traveling at high speeds? Besides the tank commander has an MG, and probably a pistol or something.
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Real tank commanders would probably ditch and book it as soon as they discover they are immobile
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:48 pm

by GRUVIA » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:59 pm
Altamirus wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:That is why your tank commanders are Kenyans bred to be the fastest people alive. Mine aren't, but Satirius' might be.
No, he would just have his tanks come out and shoot the guy that immobilized his tank with his extremely designed to be space efficient assault rifle.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:03 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Grishahakkaverchynot
Advertisement