After looking over my argument with someone in the SF thread, point conceded.
Advertisement

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:18 am

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Nov 21, 2010 3:19 pm

by Strykla » Sun Nov 21, 2010 3:38 pm

by L3 Communications » Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:07 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Altamirus wrote:You should be how I utterly destroyed GV SF sniper range claim.
Everyone destroyed GV's sniper claim, I think Sat and Kat joined in, as well as a few draftroom vets. For once all of the realism douches in these threads united for one purpose, to tear GV a new one for his uberwank snipers.
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...

by Chernobyl-Pripyat » Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:52 pm

by Amerikians » Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:09 pm

by L3 Communications » Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:12 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...

by Chernobyl-Pripyat » Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:35 pm
Amerikians wrote:What's it matter at it being a T-72? They both die just as easily. ;D


by -the Ukrainian SSR- » Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:02 pm

by New Korongo » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:08 pm




by New Korongo » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:14 pm

by Neblewerfer » Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:20 am

by Soviet Lancashire » Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:10 am

by Satirius » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:21 pm

by VietMai » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:33 pm

by New Korongo » Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:56 pm

by Neblewerfer » Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:50 pm

by Rusikstan » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:19 pm
Neblewerfer wrote:New Korongo wrote:
If i remeber correctly i took the turret from a T-44
Did you change the scale, I thought the T-44 turret was bigger than that. I cant remember, I lost my Russian Tank Encyclopedia for Russian WWII tanks, is the T-44 the T-34 prototype, or is it the screwball advanced version of the T-34/85 with more armor and a larger turret?
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Senestrum » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:20 pm

by Egalitarian Nations » Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:39 pm



by New Federation China » Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:49 pm
(The) Republic of China - 中華民國 - Zhōnghuá Mínguó[MT]
(The) Republic of Xindalu - 新大陸 - Xīndàlù [Rostil]

by United States of PA » Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:04 pm

by Rusikstan » Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:08 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: British Socialist Republics, Communist US of A, Equai, Gabeonia, Greater Marine, Krusilov, Kuvanda, Of Memers, Sarolandia, The Enderfolk, The Land of the Ephyral, Urmanian, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement