Yes. I thought I would make two Grenadier models, one with a smaller caliber repeating launcher, and another with a single shot 40 mm version.

Advertisement

by Nua Corda » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:34 pm


by Mozria » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:43 pm
Nua Corda wrote:Mozria wrote:
Would 7.2 x 48 mm cartridge work out? Of course, I would have to generate real cartridge specs and a projectile profile plus ballistic model to truly see, but could it be a good idea?
If you were aiming for a GP round like .280 British or 7mm UIAC, yeah. Or if you kept the OAL under 65mm.

by Aethal » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:48 pm
Mozria wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
If you were aiming for a GP round like .280 British or 7mm UIAC, yeah. Or if you kept the OAL under 65mm.
Well, I do want my rifles and GPMGs to be able to share ammunition. With a cartridge like that, I presume it would be doable. However, I can't stand but to think it underpowered.

by Nua Corda » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:49 pm
Mozria wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
If you were aiming for a GP round like .280 British or 7mm UIAC, yeah. Or if you kept the OAL under 65mm.
Well, I do want my rifles and GPMGs to be able to share ammunition. With a cartridge like that, I presume it would be doable. However, I can't stand but to think it underpowered.

by Aqizithiuda » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:50 pm
Mozria wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
If you were aiming for a GP round like .280 British or 7mm UIAC, yeah. Or if you kept the OAL under 65mm.
Well, I do want my rifles and GPMGs to be able to share ammunition. With a cartridge like that, I presume it would be doable. However, I can't stand but to think it underpowered.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Premislyd » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:51 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
Yes. I thought I would make two Grenadier models, one with a smaller caliber repeating launcher, and another with a single shot 40 mm version.
This: http://www.google.com/patents/US3404479 ... CDUQ6AEwAA
But using
This: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo10feb.htm
Instead of a barrel and separate grenade. It's basically what the later AAI SPIW used.Mozria wrote:
Well, I do want my rifles and GPMGs to be able to share ammunition. With a cartridge like that, I presume it would be doable. However, I can't stand but to think it underpowered.
Issue the 8mm Mauser, M1 loading of the .30-06 or the .276 Enfield.
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing

by Rich and Corporations » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:58 pm
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |

by Mozria » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:02 am

by Aqizithiuda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:03 am
Rich and Corporations wrote:Hmm.
Carbine and general infantry round: .30 carbine necked down to 6mm
MMG and sniper round: 7mm remington
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Nua Corda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:04 am
Aqizithiuda wrote:
This: http://www.google.com/patents/US3404479 ... CDUQ6AEwAA
But using
This: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo10feb.htm
Instead of a barrel and separate grenade. It's basically what the later AAI SPIW used.Mozria wrote:
Well, I do want my rifles and GPMGs to be able to share ammunition. With a cartridge like that, I presume it would be doable. However, I can't stand but to think it underpowered.
Issue the 8mm Mauser, M1 loading of the .30-06 or the .276 Enfield.

by Aqizithiuda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:06 am
Nua Corda wrote:Aqizithiuda wrote:
This: http://www.google.com/patents/US3404479 ... CDUQ6AEwAA
But using
This: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo10feb.htm
Instead of a barrel and separate grenade. It's basically what the later AAI SPIW used.
Issue the 8mm Mauser, M1 loading of the .30-06 or the .276 Enfield.
So, basically just the firing mechanism and magazine, with the cases serving as the barrel(s)?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Nua Corda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:13 am

by Rich and Corporations » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:13 am
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |

by Black Hand » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:26 am
Puzikas wrote:You clearly don't know about the baby bald eagle built into each one.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Why is there a "joke option" included in the poll when "yes" is already there?
Fordorsia wrote:Sight rib? Like a barbecue?
Fordorsia wrote:Why sell the restored weapons when you can keep them in a military-themed sex dungeon?
San-Silvacian wrote:Nothing says I love you like a fine Belgian firearm.
Bezombia wrote: "glorious discharge"

by Rich and Corporations » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:27 am
Black Hand wrote:If I have power armor should I have IFV's or no? Mean they can't walk everywhere but air transport should.be viable within controlled areas or alternatively trucks. But I am unsure on APC's and IFV's
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |

by Romic » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:29 am
Black Hand wrote:If I have power armor should I have IFV's or no? Mean they can't walk everywhere but air transport should.be viable within controlled areas or alternatively trucks. But I am unsure on APC's and IFV's


by Aqizithiuda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:46 am
.Rich and Corporations wrote:Aqizithiuda wrote:
What bullet weight, OAL and barrel length for the .30/6?
bullet weight: 4.1 grams (low-lead FMJ), 4.8 grams (AP-lead boat tail tracer)
OAL: 43mm
barrel length: 5 inches or 15 inches
pressure: 55,000 psi
as a minor note, the .380 acp subsonic is also used for special operations
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Lossesin » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:53 am

by Nua Corda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:26 am
Aqizithiuda wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
Seems like that would leave the rounds and mechanism a bit vulnerable...
Probably. But, hey, it's lightweight.
Rich and Corporations wrote:bullet weight: 4.1 grams (low-lead FMJ), 4.8 grams (AP-lead boat tail tracer)
OAL: 43mm
barrel length: 5 inches or 15 inches
pressure: 55,000 psi
as a minor note, the .380 acp subsonic is also used for special operations
A rough estimate, based off the 6mm Garin, suggests a MV of 2460 ft/s from a 15" barrel for the 4.1 gram bullet. The trajectory would probably look a bit like this: http://www.geoffrey-kolbe.com/cgi-bin/t ... age=884420
From a 5" barrel, you're looking at around 2000 ft/s.

by Aqizithiuda » Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:31 am
Nua Corda wrote:Aqizithiuda wrote:
Probably. But, hey, it's lightweight.
A rough estimate, based off the 6mm Garin, suggests a MV of 2460 ft/s from a 15" barrel for the 4.1 gram bullet. The trajectory would probably look a bit like this: http://www.geoffrey-kolbe.com/cgi-bin/t ... age=884420
From a 5" barrel, you're looking at around 2000 ft/s.
Wasn't there another design that had a fixed mag which swung forward to be loaded with stripper clips?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by The Archangel Conglomerate » Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:39 am
Mozria wrote:I guess I could make the 7.2 x 48 mm round work. It just seems that it would be in some silly twilight between intermediate and full rifle cartridges. I don't like that reality, but it would certainly simplify logistics.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.

by Triplebaconation » Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:06 am
Fordorsia wrote:(Image)
Model 1790 Wall Musket
Cartridge: N/A
Caliber: 25.4mm / 1.
Effective Range: 100 meters
Maximum Range: 180 meters
Rate of Fire: N/A
Feed System: Muzzle Loading
Bought as a pair in 1790 by the Fordorsian Militia, the Model 1790 was among the largest muzzle-loading black powder firearms ever made. The muskets were designed to counter the increasing number of large Wasters strapping their smaller kin to thick wooden shields, allowing them to cross the Silver Wind bridge in relative safety. These shields proved to be effective against the mismatched and varying caliber muskets of the Militia, and since much of the Militia's equipment was bought by those serving, many were forced to chip in to afford the Model 1790's.
Starting as a smoothbore musket firing round lead balls, the Model 1790 was relatively inaccurate despite it's extremely long barrel. The round ball was still very effective against the Wasters' shields whenever it hit, punching through all their layers and into the individual holding it, usually completely destroying whatever body part it hit.
In 1802 after the invention of the Minnie ball, both muskets were converted, replacing their smoothbore barrels with rifled ones, making them much more accurate at longer ranges.
Both rifles saw use at the Silver Wind bridge for a further 30 years before being taken out of service. Both rifles still survive and are on display at the Fordorsian National Museum.

by Bezombia » Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:05 am
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Fordorsia wrote:mfw Beano is my dad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSWiMoO8zNE
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies

by Bezombia » Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:30 am
Mozria wrote:Guys, I am trying to embrace smaller calibers than my previous super-recoiling rape-train round, but it's really hard. How does 8.25 x 55 mm sound to you?
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Fordorsia wrote:mfw Beano is my dad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSWiMoO8zNE
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Kuvanda, Manches, The Aquaria, The Austro Germanic Union, Urmanian, Weisserschnee
Advertisement