NS infantry discussion thread. Mark II

by **Premislyd** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:34 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:(Image)

san squad superior squad

death to german and british fags

You forgot the most important piece of equipment every "french" soldier needs.

by **Spreewerke** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:38 pm

Premislyd wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:(Image)

san squad superior squad

death to german and british fags

You forgot the most important piece of equipment every "french" soldier needs.

The background isn't white: it's just a super-sized flag.

by **Doppio Giudici** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:57 pm

Does the retcon replacement of the CR-37 have any issues like the last one?

by **Yes Im Biop** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:06 pm

I'm designing a LAAG for the Juggernaut, or probably a dedicated armor suit. Can anyone tell me which would be better? 2, 20mm guns or 1 .50cal 3 barreled gun?

by **Bezombia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:06 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:I'm designing a LAAG for the Juggernaut, or probably a dedicated armor suit. Can anyone tell me which would be better? 2, 20mm guns or 1 .50cal 3 barreled gun?

How about an M61?

by **Yes Im Biop** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:09 pm

Bezombia wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:I'm designing a LAAG for the Juggernaut, or probably a dedicated armor suit. Can anyone tell me which would be better? 2, 20mm guns or 1 .50cal 3 barreled gun?

How about an M61?

Isn't that a .308?

by **The Republic of Lanos** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:10 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
Bezombia wrote:
How about an M61?

Isn't that a .308?

M61 Vulcan is 20mm

by **Yes Im Biop** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:11 pm

The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Isn't that a .308?

M61 Vulcan is 20mm

O the Vulcan gun. Yeah that would be overkill for even me.,

by **Black Hand** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:36 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:M61 Vulcan is 20mm

O the Vulcan gun. Yeah that would be overkill for even me.,

GAU-19, 12.7X99 three barrels, 1000-2000 RPM

by **Bezombia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:41 pm

Black Hand wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
O the Vulcan gun. Yeah that would be overkill for even me.,

GAU-19, 12.7X99 three barrels, 1000-2000 RPM

Yak-b. 12.7x108, four barrels, 5000 RPM.

by **Oaledonia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:49 pm

Bezombia wrote:
Black Hand wrote:GAU-19, 12.7X99 three barrels, 1000-2000 RPM

Yak-b. 12.7x108, four barrels, 5000 RPM.

GAU-8. 30x173, seven barrels, 4200 RPM.

by **Yes Im Biop** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:38 pm

Overcompensating boys? I just needed something that could shoot at low flying aircraft, and more regularly, rip through building and light vehicles.

How the Fuck am I supposed to fit an 18 foot gun on an 8 foot tall dragon?>

by **Black Hand** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:28 am

Yes Im Biop wrote:Overcompensating boys? I just needed something that could shoot at low flying aircraft, and more regularly, rip through building and light vehicles.

How the Fuck am I supposed to fit an 18 foot gun on an 8 foot tall dragon?>

just issue a M3 browning aircraft HMG that will work.

by **DnalweN acilbupeR** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:35 am

San-Silvacian wrote:(Image)

san squad superior squad

death to german and british fags

holy fuck. One of your guys has 12 launched grenades, 2 thrown grenades and 4 rifle grenades? Shit.

by **San-Silvacian** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:28 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:(Image)

san squad superior squad

death to german and british fags

holy fuck. One of your guys has 12 launched grenades, 2 thrown grenades and 4 rifle grenades? Shit.

grenadier to the max.

by **Imperializt Russia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:16 am

So, considering the grenades for my OICW.
I'm thinking medium-velocity above 100m/s, possibly up to 200-250m/s

I'm thinking a standard HEDP grenade, with the design goal of being more powerful than the M433 grenade (more than 45g filler, possibly a bigger HEAT cone): http://www.mlmintl.com/40mmHEDP-M433I.pdf
A heavier AT grenade, so I'm thinking a longer cone and possibly a more exotic liner material to significantly boost its penetration
And a directional smart anti-personnel grenade, capable of directing fragmentation in a special direction.

There are two concepts that Aqi showed me yesterday.
Page 11, to achieve the effect on page 9: http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2011smallarms/ ... erhala.pdf

I was wondering if anyone figured which concept the thought sounded better.
It strikes me that the "counter-rotational detonation wave" (the idea, for those who don't understand the diagram, seems to have the projectile spinning in flight and a detonation sequence begins in the fragmentation layer in the opposite direction, keeping the fragmentation stream in roughly the same orientation) might be prone to target shift and device failure (setting up a chain reaction to travel at thousands of rpm against a rotation?), but the "reconfigured sections" seems like it might be capable of generating a wider fragmentation field, but may fail to correctly fold out in flight.

Personally, I like the reconfigured sections concept.

by **San-Silvacian** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:20 am

M1920 for TF, NS is a meh. I'm to french right nowwwwwwwww

by **Fordorsia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:43 am

San-Silvacian wrote:([url=http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/34/ep16.png]Image)[/url]

M1920 for TF, NS is a meh. I'm to french right nowwwwwwwww

That bolt look really wide. Cartridge?

by **Imperializt Russia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:01 am

Is anyone with an NSD account having problems there?
I'm getting slow page loads, a (104) error "connection reset by peer" and then when it eventually posted a thread for me, the thread initially displayed a "page could not be loaded".

by **San-Silvacian** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:02 am

Fordorsia wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:([url=http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/34/ep16.png]Image)[/url]

M1920 for TF, NS is a meh. I'm to french right nowwwwwwwww

That bolt look really wide. Cartridge?

It just a little 6.5mm round.

by **Fordorsia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:10 am

San-Silvacian wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:
That bolt look really wide. Cartridge?

It just a little 6.5mm round.

So why's the bolt so massive?

by **The Archangel Conglomerate** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:11 am

Yes Im Biop wrote:I'm designing a LAAG for the Juggernaut, or probably a dedicated armor suit. Can anyone tell me which would be better? 2, 20mm guns or 1 .50cal 3 barreled gun?

From what I've seen, dual autocannons are preferable to multi-barrel weapons.

Dual 40mm autocannons for best results.

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:holy fuck. One of your guys has 12 launched grenades, 2 thrown grenades and 4 rifle grenades? Shit.

Apparently San grenadiers don't fuck around when it comes to making thing go boom.

You probably don't want to see San demo-troops/combat engineers.

by **Imperializt Russia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:13 am

Fordorsia wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:
It just a little 6.5mm round.

So why's the bolt so massive?

Well, looking at the aesthetically similar 98k, it looks almost slightly recessed into the stock.
My guess is, San's is just not recessed.

by **Fordorsia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:33 am

What's a handgun that I could use to replace my Mk.1 in the 60's-70's? It would need to be simple, rugged, and be able to chamber a .450. cartridge.

Mk.1:

by **Bezombia** » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:41 am

Fordorsia wrote:What's a handgun that I could use to replace my Mk.1 in the 60's-70's? It would need to be simple, rugged, and be able to chamber a .450. cartridge.

Mk.1:
(Image)

CZ-97B.

NS infantry discussion thread. Mark II

Who will OP the next iteration of the IDT?

Who is online