Advertisement

by Premislyd » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:24 pm
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing

by Fordorsia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:29 pm
Premislyd wrote:So not really seeing what police "brutality" and "riots" have to do with infantry discussion of your fictional, online countries.

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by Blackledge » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:30 pm
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Blackledge wrote:Oh I've had half the things. It's the other halves that I nitpick. I like pulled pork, but not in a turnover. And chicken and dumplings, but the word "dessicated" won't help the digestion process. Are you Hungarian by any chance? Halušky and goulash, and all.
Dessicated just means you need to add water. And no, I'm not Hungarian. It's kind of funny, I actually modeled a good part of this nation after Romania (culture and cuisine), and most of the other bits take inspiration from Scandinavia (econoic and sociopolitical landscape). However we're getting a little off track at this point.

by Kouralia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:32 pm
Blackledge wrote:Infantry covers (aka hats). Preferences and styles? I know the beret is rather popular, but for personal uniform designs (such as I can make them) I tend to leave berets for special units, with a common field cap based on the bergmutze for daily wear and a peaked cap for dress uniform.

20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

by Blackledge » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:34 pm

by Blackledge » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:39 pm

by Fordorsia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:39 pm
Kouralia wrote:Blackledge wrote:Infantry covers (aka hats). Preferences and styles? I know the beret is rather popular, but for personal uniform designs (such as I can make them) I tend to leave berets for special units, with a common field cap based on the bergmutze for daily wear and a peaked cap for dress uniform.
Beret. Because berets are fucking awesome (and aren't hats). Also cap for dress, and shako for full.

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by Kouralia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:49 pm
Blackledge wrote:Ah, that's Army-speak. I've heard several different names for hands, so to speak. Semantically speaking a beret is a type of hat.
Still, rather French for standard headdress.
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

by New Visegrad » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:52 pm
Fordorsia wrote:Premislyd wrote:So not really seeing what police "brutality" and "riots" have to do with infantry discussion of your fictional, online countries.
F.R.G are reserve infantry as well as riot police
But yes, enough talk of such things.
Any comments on my SAR Mk.2 before I can be bothered to make a writeup?

by The Archangel Conglomerate » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:54 pm
Bezombia wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and say that I doubt you'd get 7.92x57 performance form a 43mm case.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.

by Fordorsia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:58 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:02 pm
Blackledge wrote:Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Dessicated just means you need to add water. And no, I'm not Hungarian. It's kind of funny, I actually modeled a good part of this nation after Romania (culture and cuisine), and most of the other bits take inspiration from Scandinavia (econoic and sociopolitical landscape). However we're getting a little off track at this point.
Aye. And I do know dessicated, I just know it's very unappetizing sounding.![]()
Anywho...
Infantry covers (aka hats). Preferences and styles? I know the beret is rather popular, but for personal uniform designs (such as I can make them) I tend to leave berets for special units, with a common field cap based on the bergmutze for daily wear and a peaked cap for dress uniform.

by New Tsavon » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:02 pm

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:04 pm

by Purpelia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:04 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:10 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Fordorsia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:10 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:14 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Bezombia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:19 pm
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Fordorsia wrote:mfw Beano is my dad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSWiMoO8zNE
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies

by Aqizithiuda » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:29 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Aqizithiuda, would you happen to have much of an opinion on the differences between the barrel designs in the Metal Storm 2004 patent?
Figures three and four look similar, but also very different.
It strikes me that Fig3 looks simpler, with primer and pressure chambers contained within the individual cartridges and that Fig4 places the pressure chambers within the barrel itself.
It strikes me that Fig3 would better facilitate the swapping of loaded barrels as magazines (somehow) but likely increase the potential for cartridge failure, possibly catastrophic. If the tube were to be incorrectly packed in the factory, the pressure chambers could become damaged and rupture on firing or possibly even detonate a projectile.
Fig4's design would appear safer, as failures in the barrel are likely to be noted before packing and unlikely to be affected by packing.
The AICW's round design, however, does not appear to be especially similar to designs presented in the patent.
I've also suddenly become intrigued by the 30mm cartridge of the AGS-17 and 30. Might also produce a conventional OICW utilising those cartridges, while this Metal Storm-derived system may use 30mm or 40mm shells, I'm not certain. Suppose it depends on how "smart" I can get a 30mm projectile to go.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by New Tsavon » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:32 pm
Fordorsia wrote:Armoured ushankas though. Ain't no one got shit on those.

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:35 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Aqizithiuda, would you happen to have much of an opinion on the differences between the barrel designs in the Metal Storm 2004 patent?
Figures three and four look similar, but also very different.
It strikes me that Fig3 looks simpler, with primer and pressure chambers contained within the individual cartridges and that Fig4 places the pressure chambers within the barrel itself.
It strikes me that Fig3 would better facilitate the swapping of loaded barrels as magazines (somehow) but likely increase the potential for cartridge failure, possibly catastrophic. If the tube were to be incorrectly packed in the factory, the pressure chambers could become damaged and rupture on firing or possibly even detonate a projectile.
Fig4's design would appear safer, as failures in the barrel are likely to be noted before packing and unlikely to be affected by packing.
The AICW's round design, however, does not appear to be especially similar to designs presented in the patent.
I've also suddenly become intrigued by the 30mm cartridge of the AGS-17 and 30. Might also produce a conventional OICW utilising those cartridges, while this Metal Storm-derived system may use 30mm or 40mm shells, I'm not certain. Suppose it depends on how "smart" I can get a 30mm projectile to go.
Could I get a link to the patent in question?

Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Dharmasya, Jasonie Japan
Advertisement