NATION

PASSWORD

NS infantry discussion thread. Mark II

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will OP the next iteration of the IDT?

Aqizithiuda
36
27%
Benomia
34
25%
Dread Lady Nathicana
6
4%
Kyrusia
3
2%
Purpelia
11
8%
Samoz (Imperializt Russia)
8
6%
Spreewerke
14
10%
Transnapastain
9
7%
Ulfr-Reich / Aethal
3
2%
United states of brazilian nations
10
7%
 
Total votes : 134

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:37 am

Bezombia wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:(Image)


yo dawk i heard u like optics


Needs more optics.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18417
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Celritannia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:37 am

San-Silvacian wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
That's why I have a 5 man 'fire team' (Or Celritannian Squads) and a 10 man section. If one fire team is pinned the other fire team can help.


That's what your supposed to do.


My 'fire teams' are more independent than IRL though :P

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:40 am

Celritannia wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:
That's what your supposed to do.


My 'fire teams' are more independent than IRL though :P


Define "more independent than IRL". :P
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:42 am

Crookfur wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Once more. Punk style tight rubber or PVC pants for military issue. Y/N and why?


all of teh chafing

general discomfort

the sweating

the difficulty in dressing in such garments

The fact that they will start to look shabby and horribly dirty unless you spend all your time either doign nothing soldiery or stop every 5 mins to cleana nd oil them.

I also don't think they have terribly long wear lives.

As far as I cna se the only reason to have them would be "Purpelia" or having a high command full of fetishists (which may be the same thing).



You forgot to mention that it's loud as fuck. Our butchers have to wear PVC overalls and you can hear them from across the building.



As per folding stocks being used in CQB: no. Why would you consider this?

Let's take a look at some CQB with folding-stock-equipped weapons, though: look at all the stocks that are folded!

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18417
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Celritannia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:43 am

Immoren wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
My 'fire teams' are more independent than IRL though :P


Define "more independent than IRL". :P


In urban warfare, 'fire teams' will be the main unit of choice to charge and clear objectives.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist

User avatar
Gvozdevsk
Minister
 
Posts: 2338
Founded: Dec 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gvozdevsk » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:56 am

Immoren wrote:I was wondering why not some modern infantry squads don't have explicitly marked second in command.
Is the reason
A) By the time 2iC would be taking command, squad would already be worthless as unit due to losses it's sustained.
or
B)It's thought to be common sense, that squad members figure out whom takes charge after SL falls
or
C)Other. :P

In Canadian sections the 2IC is the Master Corporal. I believe that you even have to go through some kind of leadership course to be promoted to Master Corporal in the infantry.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:24 am

Immoren wrote:It doesn't mean anything. I don't know why I added it. :P
But fo example US army and USMC squads don't seem to have explicit 2iC positions.
And I am not about Russians either...

Seems like an obvious thing, though, what with ranks and teams already in place.
Plus, the US has an overabundance of sergeants anyway so certainly there's always a couple more waiting to step up.

Gvozdevsk wrote: I believe that you even have to go through some kind of leadership course to be promoted to Master Corporal in the infantry.

This is true, the infantry has the ISCC (Infantry Section Commander's Course).
Last edited by Blackledge on Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
Kaledy
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Dec 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaledy » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:30 am

Kaledian Military Ranks

Non-commissioned Officers

Image
Image

Silver/blue helmet: Kaledian stormtrooper.
Blue/blue helmet: Kaledian corporal.
Blue/blue helmet + blue/blue skirt: Kaledian sergeant

Commissioned Officers

Image
Image

Black/blue helmet: Kaledian lieutenant
Black/blue helmet + black/blue skirt: Kaledian captain.
Black/silver helmet: Kaledian major.

Image
Image

Black/white helmet: Kaledian colonel.
Black/black helmet: Kaledian brigadier.
Black/gold helmet: Kaledian general.

Kaledian Extraterritorial Force

Image
Image

Grey/black helmet: Extraterritorial stormtrooper.
Gold/black helmet: Extraterritorial commander.
Gold/black helmet + gold/black skirt: Extraterritorial commander in chief.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:33 am

Glad to know snipers won't waste time deciding which target to eliminate.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:33 am

Doesn't colour-coding "ur dudes" just make them more obvious targets on the battlefield?
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
The Soodean Imperium
Senator
 
Posts: 4859
Founded: May 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Soodean Imperium » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:46 am

Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon? My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.

Image
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
Last harmonized by Hu Jintao on Sat Mar 4, 2006 2:33pm, harmonized 8 times in total.


"In short, when we hastily attribute to aesthetic and inherited faculties the artistic nature of Athenian civilization, we are almost proceeding as did men in the Middle Ages, when fire was explained by phlogiston and the effects of opium by its soporific powers." --Emile Durkheim, 1895
Come join Septentrion!
ICly, this nation is now known as the Socialist Republic of Menghe (대멩 사회주의 궁화국, 大孟社會主義共和國). You can still call me Soode in OOC.

User avatar
Kaledy
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Dec 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaledy » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:52 am

[spoiler=OOC:]Notes: I mostly used classical Doctor Who Dalek color schemes for the ranks. The silver and blue stormtrooper is a reference to the classical Mark IV silver and blue Dalek from the Hartnell and Troughton era.

The Black/blue helmet Kaledian lieutenant is a reference to the Evil of the Daleks Supreme Dalek.
The black/blue helmet + black/blue skirt Kaledian captain is in reference to the first two Doctors Supreme Dalek. The Black/silver helmet and skirt Kaledian major is a reference to the Remembrance of the Daleks Supreme Dalek.

Black/white helmet: Kaledian colonel- Resurrection of the Daleks Supreme Dalek.
Black/black helmet: Kaledian brigadier - As far as I know there was never a real completely black Supreme Dalek in the classical series but in The Dalek Invasion of Earth they used a black Dalek with blue balls as a Supreme Dalek. Since this series was filmed in black and white, people mistook it for a fully black Dalek.
There was a fully black Dalek in the new series as well.

Black/gold helmet: Kaledian general from the member of The Supreme Dalek Counsel from Planet of the Daleks.

Grey/black helmet: Extraterritorial stormtrooper - a reference to the grey black Daleks first seen in Day of the Daleks up to Remembrance of the Daleks.
Gold/black helmet + gold/black skirt: Extraterritorial commander in chief - Chief Dalek from Day of the Daleks.

The rest is made up to fill the ranks.[/spoiler]
Last edited by Kaledy on Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Kaledy
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Dec 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaledy » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:53 am

Blackledge wrote:Doesn't colour-coding "ur dudes" just make them more obvious targets on the battlefield?


Yes.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:06 pm

The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon? My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.

(Image)
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)


very very nice, i love how well organized this is. Also BMP-2 is king.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:10 pm

The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?
My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.

(Image)
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)

Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.

Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?

Kaledy wrote:Yes.

Heh, alright.
Last edited by Blackledge on Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:20 pm

Blackledge wrote:Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.

Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?
.


If Russians can cope with similarly sized platoons, then I can guess, he could cope too. :P
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:21 pm

Blackledge wrote:
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?
My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.

(Image)
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)

Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.

Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?

Leaving it as a three vehicle platoon could in theory allow him more manoeuvre elements for the same level of manpower to four-vehicle platoon-based formations.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:26 pm

Immoren wrote:If Russians can cope with similarly sized platoons, then I can guess, he could cope too. :P

Russians compensate for small platoons with glorious love of the Motherland and deep reserves. ;)

Imperializt Russia wrote:Leaving it as a three vehicle platoon could in theory allow him more manoeuvre elements for the same level of manpower to four-vehicle platoon-based formations.

Plausible enough. That's why I ask. Is the 3 vehicle decision somewhat arbitrary on his part, or part of a larger doctrine? Three-vehicle platoons in a four-platoon company as opposed to the opposite, for example.
Last edited by Blackledge on Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:30 pm

Blackledge wrote:
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?
My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.

(Image)
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)

Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.

Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?

Kaledy wrote:Yes.

Heh, alright.


I wasn't aware the Russians did this with mechanized infantry too, but I already knew they have (or used to have) 3-tank platoons. Supposedly this lets them have more units/formations, which is obvious really. The only problem I see with this, apart from (according to some, arguable) combat effectiveness, is with really small targets/missions which should be doable with a single platoon, but for anything other than that, they offer better management of forces. The smaller your pixels are, the sharper the image, if you catch my drift.

EDIT: Actually, is this trend followed throughout their whole organization, or is it just for platoons?

Come to think about it, this could have downsides too, but again, I think this is mostly for small, isolated ops. For example, a certain event may be handled by one relatively large brigade but might prove too much for a similar independent formation only smaller. Unless you want to deploy a formation and a half or something like that you now have to deploy two smaller formations and may end up over-doing things as you now have more troops on the field than the guy that uses the bigger formations.
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:36 pm

I catch you, Dnal. Part of the Russian doctrine strikes me as a reaction to the historic unreliability they've (their higher command) had with their junior officers and especially their NCOs. Putting fewer eggs in each basket, eh?
But maybe Putin has reformed all of that. I wouldn't know. The closest to Russian soldiers I've ever gotten was training with Georgian soldiers, and nothing they said about Russians was positive.

edit: why did i put have and has next to each other...
Last edited by Blackledge on Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
The Soodean Imperium
Senator
 
Posts: 4859
Founded: May 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Soodean Imperium » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:37 pm

Blackledge wrote:
Immoren wrote:If Russians can cope with similarly sized platoons, then I can guess, he could cope too. :P

Russians compensate for small platoons with glorious love of the Motherland and deep reserves. ;)

Imperializt Russia wrote:Leaving it as a three vehicle platoon could in theory allow him more manoeuvre elements for the same level of manpower to four-vehicle platoon-based formations.

Plausible enough. That's why I ask. Is the 3 vehicle decision somewhat arbitrary on his part, or part of a larger doctrine? Three-vehicle platoons in a four-platoon company as opposed to the opposite, for example.

My design process largely consists of starting with Soviet formations/doctrine and tweaking them here and there. Hence, the 3-vehicle platoons, but with PK machine guns assigned at the squad level (in place of RPKs) instead of the Company level. Given that the I'm mostly using Soviet military doctrine, I figured it was best to stick to Soviet formations.
Last harmonized by Hu Jintao on Sat Mar 4, 2006 2:33pm, harmonized 8 times in total.


"In short, when we hastily attribute to aesthetic and inherited faculties the artistic nature of Athenian civilization, we are almost proceeding as did men in the Middle Ages, when fire was explained by phlogiston and the effects of opium by its soporific powers." --Emile Durkheim, 1895
Come join Septentrion!
ICly, this nation is now known as the Socialist Republic of Menghe (대멩 사회주의 궁화국, 大孟社會主義共和國). You can still call me Soode in OOC.

User avatar
Doppio Giudici
Senator
 
Posts: 4644
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Doppio Giudici » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:39 pm

Blackledge wrote:I catch you, Dnal. Part of the Russian doctrine strikes me as a reaction to the historic unreliability they've (their higher command) has had with their junior officers and especially their NCOs. Putting fewer eggs in each basket, eh?
But maybe Putin has reformed all of that. I wouldn't know. The closest to Russian soldiers I've ever gotten was training with Georgian soldiers, and nothing they said about Russians was positive.


Each country in NATO has some plan or thing they cling to when they plan their weapons or tactics, Russian seems to cling to numbers and use of force. I'm not sure.
I use this old account for FT, Pentaga Giudici and Vadia are for MT.

"Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening"

Construction is taking forever, but Prole Confederation will be paying millions of Trade Units for embassies and merchants that show up at the SBTH

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25549
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:41 pm

Blackledge wrote:
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?
My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.

(Image)
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)

Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)

Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)

Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.

Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?

Kaledy wrote:Yes.

Heh, alright.


I doubt he's basing it on Mexico.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:42 pm

Blackledge wrote:I catch you, Dnal. Part of the Russian doctrine strikes me as a reaction to the historic unreliability they've (their higher command) has had with their junior officers and especially their NCOs. Putting fewer eggs in each basket, eh?
But maybe Putin has reformed all of that. I wouldn't know. The closest to Russian soldiers I've ever gotten was training with Georgian soldiers, and nothing they said about Russians was positive.


Maybe I'm getting the wrong impression but there are quite a couple of videos that show Russian soldiers being quite undisciplined and plain stupid, such as firing from the hip and other such antics you'd expect from the rebel forces of a generic African country but not from what Russia pretends to be, then again I might be mistaking Georgians for Russians.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:43 pm

Even thought in last incarnation with armoured infantry I went to the "squad leader plus two fire teams" there's something compelling for me in going (back) for squad being smallest unit of "independent" manouver in armoured infantry and squad would basically be that "squad lead+three fire and manovre pairs". Two pairs operating either RPG or RCL and one MG pair.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Falloa, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads