Needs more optics.
Advertisement
by Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:37 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Celritannia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:37 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:40 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Spreewerke » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:42 am
Crookfur wrote:Purpelia wrote:Once more. Punk style tight rubber or PVC pants for military issue. Y/N and why?
all of teh chafing
general discomfort
the sweating
the difficulty in dressing in such garments
The fact that they will start to look shabby and horribly dirty unless you spend all your time either doign nothing soldiery or stop every 5 mins to cleana nd oil them.
I also don't think they have terribly long wear lives.
As far as I cna se the only reason to have them would be "Purpelia" or having a high command full of fetishists (which may be the same thing).
by Celritannia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:43 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Gvozdevsk » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:56 am
Immoren wrote:I was wondering why not some modern infantry squads don't have explicitly marked second in command.
Is the reason
A) By the time 2iC would be taking command, squad would already be worthless as unit due to losses it's sustained.
or
B)It's thought to be common sense, that squad members figure out whom takes charge after SL falls
or
C)Other.
by Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:24 am
Immoren wrote:It doesn't mean anything. I don't know why I added it.
But fo example US army and USMC squads don't seem to have explicit 2iC positions.
And I am not about Russians either...
Gvozdevsk wrote: I believe that you even have to go through some kind of leadership course to be promoted to Master Corporal in the infantry.
by Kaledy » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:30 am
by Spreewerke » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:33 am
by Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:33 am
by The Soodean Imperium » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:46 am
1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
by Kaledy » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:52 am
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:06 pm
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon? My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.
(Image)1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:10 pm
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.
(Image)1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
Kaledy wrote:Yes.
by Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:20 pm
Blackledge wrote:Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.
Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?
.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:21 pm
Blackledge wrote:The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.
(Image)1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.
Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Immoren wrote:If Russians can cope with similarly sized platoons, then I can guess, he could cope too.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Leaving it as a three vehicle platoon could in theory allow him more manoeuvre elements for the same level of manpower to four-vehicle platoon-based formations.
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:30 pm
Blackledge wrote:The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.
(Image)1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.
Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?Kaledy wrote:Yes.
Heh, alright.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Blackledge » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:36 pm
by The Soodean Imperium » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:37 pm
Blackledge wrote:Immoren wrote:If Russians can cope with similarly sized platoons, then I can guess, he could cope too.
Russians compensate for small platoons with glorious love of the Motherland and deep reserves.Imperializt Russia wrote:Leaving it as a three vehicle platoon could in theory allow him more manoeuvre elements for the same level of manpower to four-vehicle platoon-based formations.
Plausible enough. That's why I ask. Is the 3 vehicle decision somewhat arbitrary on his part, or part of a larger doctrine? Three-vehicle platoons in a four-platoon company as opposed to the opposite, for example.
by Doppio Giudici » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:39 pm
Blackledge wrote:I catch you, Dnal. Part of the Russian doctrine strikes me as a reaction to the historic unreliability they've (their higher command) has had with their junior officers and especially their NCOs. Putting fewer eggs in each basket, eh?
But maybe Putin has reformed all of that. I wouldn't know. The closest to Russian soldiers I've ever gotten was training with Georgian soldiers, and nothing they said about Russians was positive.
by Gallia- » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:41 pm
Blackledge wrote:The Soodean Imperium wrote:Any problems with this Mechanized Infantry Platoon?My main concern is about the location of the upper-ranking Sergeants (i.e., one Sgt. 1st Class in the first vehicle's dismounts, and two Staff Sergeants as commanders in the other two vehicles), but feel free to comment on the equipment, fireteam structure, ranks, etc.
(Image)1st Squad
Vehicle Team:
- 2nd Lieutenant (Vehicle Commander, Platoon Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sgt. 1st Class (Platoon Commander's Assistant)
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Marksman's Spotter)
- Specialist (Marksman)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)2nd and 3rd Squads:
Vehicle Team:
- Staff Sergeant (Vehicle Commander)
- Specialist (Gunner)
- Specialist (Driver-Mechanic)
Anti-Personnel Team:
- Sergeant (Rifleman, Squad Leader)
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries MG ammo)
- Specialist (Machine-gunner)
Anti-Tank Team:
- Corporal (Rifleman, Team Leader)
- Specialist (AT Grenadier)
- Pvt. 1st Class (Rifleman, carries 3 AT rounds)
Looks pretty good. Maybe a slightly small platoon boots-on-the-ground-wise, but things fit. If you're basing it on USian ranks, it seems matching from what I know. And in BMPs to boot.
Edit: In fact, thought about adding a fourth vehicle and squad?Kaledy wrote:Yes.
Heh, alright.
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:42 pm
Blackledge wrote:I catch you, Dnal. Part of the Russian doctrine strikes me as a reaction to the historic unreliability they've (their higher command) has had with their junior officers and especially their NCOs. Putting fewer eggs in each basket, eh?
But maybe Putin has reformed all of that. I wouldn't know. The closest to Russian soldiers I've ever gotten was training with Georgian soldiers, and nothing they said about Russians was positive.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Immoren » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:43 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement