
Advertisement

by Cobhanglica » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:09 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
You'd have conquered a nation as large as a metropolitan area...doesn't that seem like a waste of time, recources, and money?
Not really. We don't have anything better to do with the army right now except patrol the border wall, and that's dirt cheap. Besides, war stimulates the economy.
Not wars against countries that small. It is not the war, but the boosted industries that stimulate the economy.
We can still loot their treasury and sell everything in their country off to businessmen for quick money. A country of 6 million has to have at least a couple hundred million dollars.
The problem is, unlike ye olde days where they would literally have treasuries of gold, nearly everyone uses bills.
What does that mean? All that money you take is worthless as their government prints it out on the double during the war, causing inflation. Not to mention the international market doesn't look too kindly on bills of non-existant states.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:10 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
You'd have conquered a nation as large as a metropolitan area...doesn't that seem like a waste of time, recources, and money?
Not really. We don't have anything better to do with the army right now except patrol the border wall, and that's dirt cheap. Besides, war stimulates the economy.
Not wars against countries that small. It is not the war, but the boosted industries that stimulate the economy.
We can still loot their treasury and sell everything in their country off to businessmen for quick money. A country of 6 million has to have at least a couple hundred million dollars.
The problem is, unlike ye olde days where they would literally have treasuries of gold, nearly everyone uses bills.
What does that mean? All that money you take is worthless as their government prints it out on the double during the war, causing inflation. Not to mention the international market doesn't look too kindly on bills of non-existant states.
OOC: The USA still keeps a literal stockpile of gold. I'm not sure if other countries do, but that could be looted in the event of a conquest.
IC: We can still sell buildings, farms, roads, artifacts, vehicles, homes, raw materials, land, etc.

by Cobhanglica » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:12 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
You'd have conquered a nation as large as a metropolitan area...doesn't that seem like a waste of time, recources, and money?
Not really. We don't have anything better to do with the army right now except patrol the border wall, and that's dirt cheap. Besides, war stimulates the economy.
Not wars against countries that small. It is not the war, but the boosted industries that stimulate the economy.
We can still loot their treasury and sell everything in their country off to businessmen for quick money. A country of 6 million has to have at least a couple hundred million dollars.
The problem is, unlike ye olde days where they would literally have treasuries of gold, nearly everyone uses bills.
What does that mean? All that money you take is worthless as their government prints it out on the double during the war, causing inflation. Not to mention the international market doesn't look too kindly on bills of non-existant states.
OOC: The USA still keeps a literal stockpile of gold. I'm not sure if other countries do, but that could be looted in the event of a conquest.
IC: We can still sell buildings, farms, roads, artifacts, vehicles, homes, raw materials, land, etc.
Even all of the gold at fort Knox isn't that much only a couple hundred million dollars worth I think.

by Cobhanglica » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:20 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:True, but nowhere near a level to make war in itself profitable against another modern force.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:25 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:True, but nowhere near a level to make war in itself profitable against another modern force.
They already said that they have no military. So basically, all we have to do is drive a bunch of conscripts in Humvees up to the government building, execute the leaders, and raise the Confederate States flag over the building. Anyone who complains gets a 7.62mm pacifier.

by Cobhanglica » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:32 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:True, but nowhere near a level to make war in itself profitable against another modern force.
They already said that they have no military. So basically, all we have to do is drive a bunch of conscripts in Humvees up to the government building, execute the leaders, and raise the Confederate States flag over the building. Anyone who complains gets a 7.62mm pacifier.
Do you think the citizens will let you waltz in and destroy their lives? Even if the military doesn't intervene you can expect citizens to grab their shot guns and hunting rifles and shoot at your soldiers.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:40 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:True, but nowhere near a level to make war in itself profitable against another modern force.
They already said that they have no military. So basically, all we have to do is drive a bunch of conscripts in Humvees up to the government building, execute the leaders, and raise the Confederate States flag over the building. Anyone who complains gets a 7.62mm pacifier.
Do you think the citizens will let you waltz in and destroy their lives? Even if the military doesn't intervene you can expect citizens to grab their shot guns and hunting rifles and shoot at your soldiers.
For dealing with upstart foreign insurgents, we have flamethrowers, gas, and carpet bombing. For every soldier killed by insurgents, we execute 1000 civilians. If an officer is killed, we will burn an entire neighborhood to the ground. Cobhanglica's approach to counterinsurgency warfare is "kill everyone". Simple, but you can't really fight back when 60% of your population is dead.

by Evil Diplomats » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:46 pm

by Fatatatutti » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:54 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:For dealing with upstart foreign insurgents, we have flamethrowers, gas, and carpet bombing. For every soldier killed by insurgents, we execute 1000 civilians. If an officer is killed, we will burn an entire neighborhood to the ground. Cobhanglica's approach to counterinsurgency warfare is "kill everyone". Simple, but you can't really fight back when 60% of your population is dead.

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:57 pm
Evil Diplomats wrote:Out of the Evil Diplomat's 6.667 Billion people, only 3% are in the military. That roughly works out too 13 Million. But these are peace time statistics.
by Anemos Major » Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:46 am
Fatatatutti wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:For dealing with upstart foreign insurgents, we have flamethrowers, gas, and carpet bombing. For every soldier killed by insurgents, we execute 1000 civilians. If an officer is killed, we will burn an entire neighborhood to the ground. Cobhanglica's approach to counterinsurgency warfare is "kill everyone". Simple, but you can't really fight back when 60% of your population is dead.
You're really not thinking this through, are you? The profit margin in this little venture would be pretty thin to begin with, and now you're talking about destroying the inventory.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Cobhanglica » Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:56 am
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:True, but nowhere near a level to make war in itself profitable against another modern force.
They already said that they have no military. So basically, all we have to do is drive a bunch of conscripts in Humvees up to the government building, execute the leaders, and raise the Confederate States flag over the building. Anyone who complains gets a 7.62mm pacifier.
Do you think the citizens will let you waltz in and destroy their lives? Even if the military doesn't intervene you can expect citizens to grab their shot guns and hunting rifles and shoot at your soldiers.
For dealing with upstart foreign insurgents, we have flamethrowers, gas, and carpet bombing. For every soldier killed by insurgents, we execute 1000 civilians. If an officer is killed, we will burn an entire neighborhood to the ground. Cobhanglica's approach to counterinsurgency warfare is "kill everyone". Simple, but you can't really fight back when 60% of your population is dead.
Yes you can the USSR lost a massive percentage of its population in WW2 and barely even flinched (granted it wasn't 60%) all that your tactics would do is give the civilians even more reason to continue. Also if you destroy everything than you will gain nothing. You won't be able to sell property because it is worthless, you can't sell slaves because most of the population is dead, you basically threw away lots of lives for a useless chunk of land.

by Marcurix » Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:11 am
Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:True, but nowhere near a level to make war in itself profitable against another modern force.
They already said that they have no military. So basically, all we have to do is drive a bunch of conscripts in Humvees up to the government building, execute the leaders, and raise the Confederate States flag over the building. Anyone who complains gets a 7.62mm pacifier.
Do you think the citizens will let you waltz in and destroy their lives? Even if the military doesn't intervene you can expect citizens to grab their shot guns and hunting rifles and shoot at your soldiers.
For dealing with upstart foreign insurgents, we have flamethrowers, gas, and carpet bombing. For every soldier killed by insurgents, we execute 1000 civilians. If an officer is killed, we will burn an entire neighborhood to the ground. Cobhanglica's approach to counterinsurgency warfare is "kill everyone". Simple, but you can't really fight back when 60% of your population is dead.
Yes you can the USSR lost a massive percentage of its population in WW2 and barely even flinched (granted it wasn't 60%) all that your tactics would do is give the civilians even more reason to continue. Also if you destroy everything than you will gain nothing. You won't be able to sell property because it is worthless, you can't sell slaves because most of the population is dead, you basically threw away lots of lives for a useless chunk of land.
Natural resources. And we can also recycle everything we destroyed into raw materials. Besides, we need something for the military to kill.

by Ancient and Holy Terra » Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:12 am


by Grandtaria » Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:53 am
Cobhanglica wrote:New Nicksyllvania wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
You'd have conquered a nation as large as a metropolitan area...doesn't that seem like a waste of time, recources, and money?
Not really. We don't have anything better to do with the army right now except patrol the border wall, and that's dirt cheap. Besides, war stimulates the economy.
Not wars against countries that small. It is not the war, but the boosted industries that stimulate the economy.
We can still loot their treasury and sell everything in their country off to businessmen for quick money. A country of 6 million has to have at least a couple hundred million dollars.
The problem is, unlike ye olde days where they would literally have treasuries of gold, nearly everyone uses bills.
What does that mean? All that money you take is worthless as their government prints it out on the double during the war, causing inflation. Not to mention the international market doesn't look too kindly on bills of non-existant states.
OOC: The USA still keeps a literal stockpile of gold. I'm not sure if other countries do, but that could be looted in the event of a conquest.
IC: We can still sell buildings, farms, roads, artifacts, vehicles, homes, raw materials, land, etc. We are basically taking their country, killing or deporting everyone in it, and then selling off all of their posessions and natural resources.
~Evil Forum Empress Rep Prod the Ninja Mod
~She who wields the Banhammer; master of the mighty moderation no-dachi Kiritateru Teikoku
I just have to say this and its worth possible spam warning, for its gone too long unsaid: "I defeat your Banhammer with my ignore cannon!"
Vipra wrote:Heh, I remember when I had a nasty lung infection. Had to get shots in the ass every couple days for two weeks, and not the fun kind of shots in the ass that involve a busty nurse with an ominous bulge in her uniform.

by Grays Harbor » Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:10 am
Norway-Swedens wrote:9,867,435 total. 5,067,435 active duty, and 4,800,000. We have conscription.

by O5vx » Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:16 am

by Israslovakahzerbajan » Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:15 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:
For dealing with upstart foreign insurgents, we have flamethrowers, gas, and carpet bombing. For every soldier killed by insurgents, we execute 1000 civilians. If an officer is killed, we will burn an entire neighborhood to the ground. Cobhanglica's approach to counterinsurgency warfare is "kill everyone". Simple, but you can't really fight back when 60% of your population is dead.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.

by Lhazastan » Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:51 pm

by Neo Prutenia » Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:16 am
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:That never stopped Yugoslavia, and they were eventually victorious. The thing is, nomater how many people you kill and opress, you can never dampen the spirit of rebellious nature. And with brutal and genocidal practices you won't make rebels, you'll eventually make fanatics.

by Augarundus » Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:59 am

by The King Penguins » Sat Jun 05, 2010 12:41 pm

by Santheres » Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:59 pm
Augarundus wrote:Of the 120,000,000 Augarians, 600,000 serve in the military in some form. Though all are combat-trained, very few are actually deployed for combat, and the strike force of Augarians is very small. Logistics is largely handled by the private industry.

by New Balkaney » Sat Jun 05, 2010 4:42 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], The Great state of Joseon
Advertisement