Page 176 of 259

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:02 pm
by Fordorsia
Bezombia wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:
Not too modern. It will probably be introduced as the first FAL rifle was. Mid-50's.


M203 was the first UBGL and it didn't exist until the late 60s.


Alternate universe where everything is basically a decade early.


The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:
Not too modern. It will probably be introduced as the first FAL rifle was. Mid-50's.

The Colt XM148 may suit your needs.

It came before the M203.


That could work. I'd have to give it a not-ugly-anymore job though.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:04 pm
by The Republic of Lanos
Fordorsia wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:The Colt XM148 may suit your needs.

It came before the M203.


That could work. I'd have to give it a not-ugly-anymore job though.

And make it work instead of its issues.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:10 pm
by Alimeria-
Kouralia wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:

"I haven't actually made an underslung one"

Why are you not basing it on that still?

Yes, figure out how to use Martini Henry Grenade Launcher for most glory

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:19 pm
by Fordorsia
Kouralia wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:

"I haven't actually made an underslung one"

Why are you not basing it on that still?


Because Fordorsia does not into vintage British.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:25 pm
by Risen Britannia
Image
just in case that burst of full auto wasn't enough....

PS: i asked "should I bother" because I wasn't sure if i liked it, I'm still not sure.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:27 pm
by Bezombia
Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)
just in case that burst of full auto wasn't enough....

PS: i asked "should I bother" because I wasn't sure if i liked it, I'm still not sure.


"There are some men that you just can't reach.
So you hoist your four foot long bayonet and stab them from two meters away."

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:32 pm
by Fordorsia
Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)
just in case that burst of full auto wasn't enough....

PS: i asked "should I bother" because I wasn't sure if i liked it, I'm still not sure.



That's not a bayonet.
Image
This, is a bayonet.


In some serious though, I like it. Just apart from the bayonet. They just look horrible on bullpups.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:47 pm
by Puzikas
Kouralia wrote:
United Republics of Aralon wrote:British what?
And who talked about htrowing 40mm? I said throw frag/thermobaric Handgrenade not 40mm.

Fighting in Built Up Areas

AKA FiSH and CHiPS
(Fighting in Someone's House and Causing Havoc in Public Spaces)
:p


Privlecheniye Vrag v Gorodskoy Srede i Zakryt boya Chetvertey, Engaging the Enemy in Urban and Close Quarters, is the Russian term, but FiSH and CHiPS is lol worthy.

United Republics of Aralon wrote:Anyway justwait for Puz to weigh in. I'm sure he knows what is the best room cleaning procedure.



Im sorry am I killing people at close range now?

Step one: Identify nature of threat
Step two: Appropriate correct use of force to engage threat
Step three: Identify proper execution of force to meet said threat (you are not going to attack a building with hostages in it the same as you might where its nothing but enemy forces)
Step four: Execution

If you want to clear a room, assuming there are all valid targets in said room, the way I would do it without use of flashbang (which, for the record, are insanely useful) would involve a a fragmentation grenade (assuming the walls were thick enough to not expose my team or myself to fragments, so this is out in the standard home, which is drywall/plaster and such) and carbines as well as some well placed shots.
Baring use of a Fragmentation grenade, very bright flashlights, surprise and very quick, rapid dominance effects and yelling. Lots of yelling.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:48 pm
by Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen
Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)
just in case that burst of full auto wasn't enough....

PS: i asked "should I bother" because I wasn't sure if i liked it, I'm still not sure.


We cannot allow a bayonet gap!

v nice btw

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:01 pm
by Fordorsia
Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen wrote:
Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)
just in case that burst of full auto wasn't enough....

PS: i asked "should I bother" because I wasn't sure if i liked it, I'm still not sure.


We cannot allow a bayonet gap!

v nice btw


What is that, a bayonet for Elves?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:41 pm
by Coltarin
Everything
I think I'm done with the KAR-21. I'm going to finish the OICW and the newer model at the bottom left. Otherwise I think it's time to move on.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:58 pm
by Aqizithiuda
Coltarin wrote:Everything
I think I'm done with the KAR-21. I'm going to finish the OICW and the newer model at the bottom left. Otherwise I think it's time to move on.


The OICW grenades need proper skirts.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:59 pm
by Purpelia
Is 38.8mm too long for a pistol round that's supposed to go into the handle? And yes, I am assuming normal sized users without giant hands.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:00 pm
by Coltarin
Aqizithiuda wrote:
Coltarin wrote:Everything
I think I'm done with the KAR-21. I'm going to finish the OICW and the newer model at the bottom left. Otherwise I think it's time to move on.


The OICW grenades need proper skirts.

I think I fixed it on the individual OICW pic, just not on the primary sheet.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:02 pm
by Purpelia
Coltarin wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:
The OICW grenades need proper skirts.

I think I fixed it on the individual OICW pic, just not on the primary sheet.

Do those grenades have a variable length fuse?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:04 pm
by Sevvania
Purpelia wrote:Is 38.8mm too long for a pistol round that's supposed to go into the handle? And yes, I am assuming normal sized users without giant hands.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/MY_AUTOMAG_III.JPG
Here's a picture of a handgun chambered for .30 carbine (7.62x33mm, overall length of 41.91 mm), if that helps.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:06 pm
by Purpelia
Sevvania wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Is 38.8mm too long for a pistol round that's supposed to go into the handle? And yes, I am assuming normal sized users without giant hands.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/MY_AUTOMAG_III.JPG
Here's a picture of a handgun chambered for .30 carbine (7.62x33mm), if that helps.

That thing falls into the "giant hands" category. Plus it's a full 3.1mm longer than mine, which in turn is 4mm longer than the regular 7.62TT.
That's why I am asking...

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:08 pm
by Bezombia
Purpelia wrote:
Sevvania wrote:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/MY_AUTOMAG_III.JPG
Here's a picture of a handgun chambered for .30 carbine (7.62x33mm), if that helps.

That thing falls into the "giant hands" category. Plus it's a full 3.1mm longer than mine, which in turn is 4mm longer than the regular 7.62TT.
That's why I am asking...


Want something closer to what you said?

Image

Just a measly ~2mm longer than what your round is.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:09 pm
by Coltarin
Purpelia wrote:
Coltarin wrote:I think I fixed it on the individual OICW pic, just not on the primary sheet.

Do those grenades have a variable length fuse?

Yes.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:09 pm
by Purpelia
Bezombia wrote:
Purpelia wrote:That thing falls into the "giant hands" category. Plus it's a full 3.1mm longer than mine, which in turn is 4mm longer than the regular 7.62TT.
That's why I am asking...


Want something closer to what you said?

Image

Just a measly ~2mm longer than what your round is.

But can that one be comfortably used by roughly 90% of the human adult population?

Coltarin wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Do those grenades have a variable length fuse?

Yes.

How does it work?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:11 pm
by Bezombia
Purpelia wrote:
Bezombia wrote:
Want something closer to what you said?

Image

Just a measly ~2mm longer than what your round is.

But can that one be comfortably used by roughly 90% of the human adult population?

Image

Comfortable? Probably not.
Usable? By all means.

I think you'd be just fine.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:13 pm
by Purpelia
Bezombia wrote:Comfortable? Probably not.
Usable? By all means.

I think you'd be just fine.

I am asking since I want to know if I should develop a handgun for my new round or just keep the original 7.5x25 +P+ Model 1985 (one with a regular pistol bullet and not the insane mini rifle one) in my army as the pistol round and use this only for SMG's.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:14 pm
by Risen Britannia
Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen wrote:
Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)
just in case that burst of full auto wasn't enough....

PS: i asked "should I bother" because I wasn't sure if i liked it, I'm still not sure.


We cannot allow a bayonet gap!

v nice btw

thanks

Image

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:15 pm
by Premislyd
Fischermann wrote:7.62x39 variant a la HK32?


Estovnia doesn't use 7.62 ComBloc.

The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:I really like this.
HK33 FTW!


United states of brazilian nations wrote:dat flash hider.
a very awesome weapon, sir.


thanks

Risen Britannia wrote:


This is win.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:16 pm
by Imperializt Russia
Risen Britannia wrote:
Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen wrote:
We cannot allow a bayonet gap!

v nice btw

thanks

Image

Cant help feeling that without a muzzle device it looks incomplete.