NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Mk.V

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Next OP for the MGVoYN[NM] Thread

The Kievan People
7
9%
Questers
6
7%
Rich and Corporations
1
1%
Yes Im Biop
6
7%
Anemos Major
38
47%
Dragomere
19
23%
Mod Controlled
4
5%
 
Total votes : 81

User avatar
Arkandros
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1815
Founded: Jul 11, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arkandros » Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:44 am

New Vihenia wrote:
Registug wrote:Might have to spam telegrams at RB for that.

As long as we don't get some big debate about a topic we're still quite a ways off from page 500.


How about tank gun design ?

I got one.
When building armored vehicles, surface area to volume ratio is usually a major concern. Basically, you want a lot of space with a little bit of surface area. To this end, a sphere is the most logical geometric structure. Because of the high profile of a full sphere, let's use a hemisphere. It still has a higher volume per surface area ratio than a box (which is basically all most modern tanks are), so let me ask a 3-part question.
One: why do we not see hemispherical or ovoid (technically oblate spheroid) tanks?
Two: what practical engineering problems does this style present? (I can think of at least one)
Three: how could these engineering problems be overcome?
Last edited by Arkandros on Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
“I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.”
John F. Kennedy

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:00 am

It's only logical if you start from the nonsensical premise that the ratio of surface area to volume is the most important parameter. It's not.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:20 am

Arkandros wrote:
New Vihenia wrote:
How about tank gun design ?

I got one.
When building armored vehicles, surface area to volume ratio is usually a major concern. Basically, you want a lot of space with a little bit of surface area. To this end, a sphere is the most logical geometric structure. Because of the high profile of a full sphere, let's use a hemisphere. It still has a higher volume per surface area ratio than a box (which is basically all most modern tanks are), so let me ask a 3-part question.
One: why do we not see hemispherical or ovoid (technically oblate spheroid) tanks?
Two: what practical engineering problems does this style present? (I can think of at least one)
Three: how could these engineering problems be overcome?


Here's one for you: modern tank turrets do not present curved surfaces for a reason, and that is the complexity of having to armor such a shape. Correct me if I am wrong, NS.

Another reason is shaped armor: you want angles as sharp as you can get if you want to deflect anything . . .

And then there's the fact that the volume gained would probably be marginally useful as most stuff that goes into AFVs such as crew, guns, ammo, electronics etc. don't really fit well into spheroids/ovoids/hemispheres/whatever . . . Perhaps you would get more fuel capacity, but other than that, I think it's pretty hard to efficiently use the volume that you gain given the awkward shape . . .
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Sevvania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6891
Founded: Nov 12, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sevvania » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:16 pm

Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
Image
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.
"Humble thyself and hold thy tongue."

Current Era: 1945
NationStates Stat Card - Sevvania
OFFICIAL FACTBOOK - Sevvania
4/1/13 - Never Forget

User avatar
Vorkova
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Vorkova » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:18 pm

Sevvania wrote:Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
(Image)
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.

Looks like a good ambush vehicle. Hide some in a forest and let loose when a tank group rolls by.

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:21 pm

Sevvania wrote:Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
(Image)
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.

Sevv you make good shit

I need to work on the Sentinel that RB drew for me

Image
It does not deserve inadequate 2pdr, it deserves glorious 17pdr!
Last edited by Registug on Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:31 pm

You need to make a Hetzer variant.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:35 pm

Purpelia wrote:You need to make a Hetzer variant.

That would be a waste of the hilariously large turret ring (for its time and size).

I should make a version with an 8.8cm KwK 43. I've read rumours that they managed to stick a captured one from a Tiger I in Africa into a Sentinel.
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:36 pm

Registug wrote:
Purpelia wrote:You need to make a Hetzer variant.

That would be a waste of the hilariously large turret ring (for its time and size).

I should make a version with an 8.8cm KwK 43. I've read rumours that they managed to stick a captured one from a Tiger I in Africa into a Sentinel.

Kwk 44 Hetzer or bust.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:39 pm

Purpelia wrote:
Registug wrote:That would be a waste of the hilariously large turret ring (for its time and size).

I should make a version with an 8.8cm KwK 43. I've read rumours that they managed to stick a captured one from a Tiger I in Africa into a Sentinel.

Kwk 44 Hetzer or bust.

I was thinking of the KwK 36 actually

And what's with you and hetzers? Jagdtigers exist too.
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
The Soodean Imperium
Senator
 
Posts: 4859
Founded: May 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Soodean Imperium » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:39 pm

Sevvania wrote:Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
(Image)
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.

Sounds like a similar concept to the Archer Tank Destroyer used in WWII: set up in ambush, fire off a few rounds, then drive away before the enemy can get reorganized. Because the gun is facing rearward, you can retreat at full speed with a clear view for the driver, and possibly fire off a few parthian shots as you flee. Though remember, with a non-stabilized anti-tank gun your accuracy will be nil while doing this.
Last harmonized by Hu Jintao on Sat Mar 4, 2006 2:33pm, harmonized 8 times in total.


"In short, when we hastily attribute to aesthetic and inherited faculties the artistic nature of Athenian civilization, we are almost proceeding as did men in the Middle Ages, when fire was explained by phlogiston and the effects of opium by its soporific powers." --Emile Durkheim, 1895
Come join Septentrion!
ICly, this nation is now known as the Socialist Republic of Menghe (대멩 사회주의 궁화국, 大孟社會主義共和國). You can still call me Soode in OOC.

User avatar
United States of PA
Senator
 
Posts: 4325
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of PA » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:41 pm

^ That. Would be good on the defensive if you ask me. Useless more or less offensively to a extent.
In other words, conservatives are generous with their own money, and liberals are generous with other peoples money.
"I object and take exception to everyone saying that Obama and Congress are spending money like a drunken sailor. As a former drunken sailor, I quit when I ran out of money." ~ Unknown
"See, it doesn't matter how many people you have, how old your civilization is, or any such tripe. We're still the by-God US of A and we will seriously bitch slap you so hard your ancestors going back millenia will feel it if you piss us off."

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:41 pm

    Low profile unmanned turret
    crew in hull configuration, 2 man crew
    longitudinally mounted engine

here's a doodle

Image

the point is to decrease frontal area as much as possible

viable y/y

EDIT: It's supposed to have a carousel autoloader with a bustle magazine turned 90 degrees and placed in the hull . . .
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:41 pm

Registug wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Kwk 44 Hetzer or bust.

I was thinking of the KwK 36 actually

And what's with you and hetzers? Jagdtigers exist too.

One is light, fast and has a bigger gun than should be permissible for such a cute little thing. The other is a lumbering behemoth that looks and like works as good as a concrete pillbox pretending to be a tank.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:43 pm

Purpelia wrote:
Registug wrote:I was thinking of the KwK 36 actually

And what's with you and hetzers? Jagdtigers exist too.

One is light, fast and has a bigger gun than should be permissible for such a cute little thing. The other is a lumbering behemoth that looks and like works as good as a concrete pillbox pretending to be a tank.

I don't think you're putting an 8.8cm in a hetzer. The 7.5cm is a good enough gun.
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:44 pm

Registug wrote:
Purpelia wrote:One is light, fast and has a bigger gun than should be permissible for such a cute little thing. The other is a lumbering behemoth that looks and like works as good as a concrete pillbox pretending to be a tank.

I don't think you're putting an 8.8cm in a hetzer. The 7.5cm is a good enough gun.

No, but I would be putting a 12.8mm on a sentinel...
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Vorkova
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Vorkova » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:44 pm

Purpelia wrote:
Registug wrote:That would be a waste of the hilariously large turret ring (for its time and size).

I should make a version with an 8.8cm KwK 43. I've read rumours that they managed to stick a captured one from a Tiger I in Africa into a Sentinel.

Kwk 44 Hetzer or bust.

The Hetzer is one of the better vehicles the Germans came up with. You think it's a cute little bug until it opens fire.

User avatar
Lydenburg
Senator
 
Posts: 4592
Founded: May 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lydenburg » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:45 pm

Sevvania wrote:Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
(Image)
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.


Why is it a rear-facing gun? The Israelis put a 90mm turret from an AML armoured car on one of their old halftracks and it worked just fine.

Image
Last edited by Lydenburg on Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Ek bly in Australie nou, maar Afrika sal altyd in my hart wees. Maak nie saak wat gebeur nie, ek is trots om te kan sê ek is 'n kind van hierdie ingewikkelde soms wrede kontinent. Mis jou altyd my Suid-Afrika, hier met n seer hart al die pad van Melbourne af!


User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:46 pm

Purpelia wrote:
Registug wrote:I don't think you're putting an 8.8cm in a hetzer. The 7.5cm is a good enough gun.

No, but I would be putting a 12.8mm on a sentinel...

The biggest I'd think of is a shortened 105mm similar to the M-51 Super Sherman made by the Israelis.
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:47 pm

Lydenburg wrote:
Sevvania wrote:Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
(Image)
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.


Why is it a rear-facing gun? The Israelis put a 90mm turret from an AML armoured car on one of their old halftracks and it worked just fine.

That's how they rocked it in WWII, Lyde.
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:47 pm

Registug wrote:
Purpelia wrote:No, but I would be putting a 12.8mm on a sentinel...

The biggest I'd think of is a shortened 105mm similar to the M-51 Super Sherman made by the Israelis.

Unless you hetzerise it by removing the turret and moding the hull to accept a gun at which point the sky is the limit.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Lydenburg
Senator
 
Posts: 4592
Founded: May 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lydenburg » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:48 pm

Registug wrote:
Lydenburg wrote:
Why is it a rear-facing gun? The Israelis put a 90mm turret from an AML armoured car on one of their old halftracks and it worked just fine.

That's how they rocked it in WWII, Lyde.

Flawed.

Image

Ek bly in Australie nou, maar Afrika sal altyd in my hart wees. Maak nie saak wat gebeur nie, ek is trots om te kan sê ek is 'n kind van hierdie ingewikkelde soms wrede kontinent. Mis jou altyd my Suid-Afrika, hier met n seer hart al die pad van Melbourne af!


User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:50 pm

Purpelia wrote:
Registug wrote:The biggest I'd think of is a shortened 105mm similar to the M-51 Super Sherman made by the Israelis.

Unless you hetzerise it by removing the turret and moding the hull to accept a gun at which point the sky is the limit.

Casemates are super lame

Lydenburg wrote:
Registug wrote:That's how they rocked it in WWII, Lyde.

Flawed.

Image

How much traverse does that get?
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Sevvania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6891
Founded: Nov 12, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sevvania » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:52 pm

Lydenburg wrote:
Sevvania wrote:Halftrackers were like:
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ gib tank gun for fight tanks

So I put this together:
(Image)
M2 Halftrack fitted with a pair of 7.62x54mmR M1919 machine guns and a rear-facing ~88mm cannon for anti-tank purposes. I'd like to know whether this is a practical approach, how effective such a vehicle might be when faced with enemy armor, and what other applications it might also be suited for.


Why is it a rear-facing gun? The Israelis put a 90mm turret from an AML armoured car on one of their old halftracks and it worked just fine.

Image

It was inspired by one of Novorden's designs.
Image
Perhaps, also, a rear-facing gun would be better-suited to hit-and-run ambushes as a way of compensating for the halftrack's inadequate armor (at least in regards to taking fire from enemy tanks); take the shot, drive as fast as possible in the other direction.
Last edited by Sevvania on Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:58 pm, edited 4 times in total.
"Humble thyself and hold thy tongue."

Current Era: 1945
NationStates Stat Card - Sevvania
OFFICIAL FACTBOOK - Sevvania
4/1/13 - Never Forget

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:52 pm

Registug wrote:Casemates are super lame

I am done talking to you now. >:(
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Equai, Kuvanda, Sagrea

Advertisement

Remove ads