Unrelated:
Advertisement
by Risen Britannia » Tue May 28, 2013 8:10 am
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by Central and Eastern Visayas » Tue May 28, 2013 8:25 am
by Saphirasia » Tue May 28, 2013 8:35 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You can do some really incredible stuff in your kitchen. And I'm talking more than just a phenomenal sandwich.
Shanix wrote:Somepony really took the time of their MLP to do life?
Olthar wrote:I prefer "I Came, I Saw, I Came Again."
Rupudska wrote:Except Nightkill, of course. Nightkill has obtained a level of badassery where his pants depart his legs of their own accord.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by New Harvest » Tue May 28, 2013 8:48 am
Nua Corda wrote:New Harvest wrote:Barrel exploding is not an option and in the future guns are going to be using 6.36mm ammo, to penetrte the new personal armor systems we're seeing emerge, or we will be using flechette's or mini APFSDS rounds.
I've found a way to solve most of the caseless ammo's problems, brass casing to deal with the 'cook off' problem, H&K's special propellant which they used so it is heat resistant, and keeping them plastic casings, so Caseless ammo is an option for my new AK74 based bullpup, I might also solve the problems associated witha bullpup AR too.
Barrel explosion has nothing to do with polymers.
Actually, any number of diameters will penetrate ballistic armor, even hilariously large calibers like 9mm.
If its got plastic or brass casings, it's not caseless. Also, caseless ammo will not work in an AK action. It requires a pushthrough action due to the delicacy of the cartridges.
The problem with a bullpup AR is ridiculous LoP, which really can't be solved without seriously modifying the action to the point that its no longer an AR.
NEW HARVEST
▲▼▲
by Nua Corda » Tue May 28, 2013 8:52 am
New Harvest wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
Barrel explosion has nothing to do with polymers.
Actually, any number of diameters will penetrate ballistic armor, even hilariously large calibers like 9mm.
If its got plastic or brass casings, it's not caseless. Also, caseless ammo will not work in an AK action. It requires a pushthrough action due to the delicacy of the cartridges.
The problem with a bullpup AR is ridiculous LoP, which really can't be solved without seriously modifying the action to the point that its no longer an AR.
looks like caseless ammo is no longer an option but it shall have:
5.39x62? (cannot remember) cartridge.
BARS recoil reduction system.
Polymer construction.
L/R selective ejection system?
increased barrel length due to it's bullpup configuration, not sure how much.
31 round box mag.
dual rails.
high modularity.
possibly new iron sights.
I need more reccomendations, I've been doing research, and I'm going to do some more.
by New Harvest » Tue May 28, 2013 8:57 am
NEW HARVEST
▲▼▲
by San-Silvacian » Tue May 28, 2013 8:59 am
by Saphirasia » Tue May 28, 2013 9:00 am
New Harvest wrote:and 31 because it beats 30.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You can do some really incredible stuff in your kitchen. And I'm talking more than just a phenomenal sandwich.
Shanix wrote:Somepony really took the time of their MLP to do life?
Olthar wrote:I prefer "I Came, I Saw, I Came Again."
Rupudska wrote:Except Nightkill, of course. Nightkill has obtained a level of badassery where his pants depart his legs of their own accord.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Ea90 » Tue May 28, 2013 9:01 am
New Harvest wrote:Also I've read something today, and thats where I got the brass casing thing for caseless ammo, I'm not really sure but it was something to do with a brass casing absorbing the heat so it does not 'cook-off'
by Central and Eastern Visayas » Tue May 28, 2013 9:02 am
San-Silvacian wrote:30+1 possible.
30 is good because you can reload your magazines with 2 15-round or three 10-round charger clips.
by Sumarma » Tue May 28, 2013 9:07 am
by Central and Eastern Visayas » Tue May 28, 2013 9:11 am
Sumarma wrote:The Army of Sumarma currently issues three different primary weapons to its soldiers.
The first is the PKP 6P41 machine gun. Also known as the "Pecheneg", this variant of the PKP was first introduced into the military in 2005, replacing the older M60 machine gun. Unlike the M60, the PKP 6P41 fired the7.56mm x 56mm7.62x54mmR round, instead of the 7.5662mmx 51mm NATO round, making it slightly more powerful. The PKP also has a higher rate of fire( up to 800 RPM in comparison to the M60s maximum of 650 RPM), and weighs less than the M60. However, it has a muzzle velocity (you don't say?) and effective range (of what?), along with a longer barrel and higher recoil. The M60 was better suited for longer ranges, but the Sumarman army was better suited to mobility and closer range fighting in urban and forested environments and the M60 was. As a result, the lighter, faster firing PKP 6P41 became the new LMG of the Sumarman Armed Forces.
The second weapon is the MP7, replacing the Mp5. While both were produced by Heckler & Kock, the MP5 was older and fired the standard 9x19pParabellum round, which was weaker than the MpP7's 4.6 x 30mm round. The MpP7 also had lower recoil, amounting in hire ranges and better controllability. Critics argued that the weapon lost out on close range capability, which while being true, was made up for by the standard issued Glock machine pistols (by which you mean the G18), which could be fired both at semi-auto and fully automatic.
There is no standard issue rifle as the M14 (7.62 NATO), AK-74M (5.45x39mm Soviet), G36C, and the M4A1 (both 5.56x45 NATO) are all available to soldiers based on their skill level with each weapon and their personal preference.
by Saphirasia » Tue May 28, 2013 9:11 am
Sumarma wrote:The Army of Sumarma currently issues three different primary weapons to its soldiers.
The first is the PKP 6P41 machine gun. Also known as the "Pecheneg", this variant of the PKP was first introduced into the military in 2005, replacing the older M60 machine gun. Unlike the M60, the PKP 6P41 fired the 7.56mm x 56mm round, instead of the 7.56mm x 51mm NATO round, making it slightly more powerful. The PKP also has a higher rate of fire( up to 800 RPM in comparison to the M60s maximum of 650 RPM), and weighs less than the M60. However, it has a muzzle velocity and effective range, along with a longer barrel and higher recoil. The M60 was better suited for longer ranges, but the Sumarman army was better suited to mobility and closer range fighting in urban and forested environments and the M60 was. As a result, the lighter, faster firing PKP 6P41 became the new LMG of the Sumarman Armed Forces.
The second weapon is the MP7, replacing the Mp5. While both were produced by Heckler & Kock, the MP5 was older and fired the standard 9x19 parabellum round, which was weaker than the Mp7's 4.6 x 30mm round. The Mp7 also had lower recoil, amounting in hire ranges and better controllability. Critics argued that the weapon lost out on close range capability, which while being true, was made up for by the standard issued Glock machine pistols, which could be fired both at semi-auto and fully automatic.
There is no standard issue rifle as the M14, AK-74M, G36C, and the M4A1 are all available to soldiers based on their skill level with each weapon and their personal preference.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You can do some really incredible stuff in your kitchen. And I'm talking more than just a phenomenal sandwich.
Shanix wrote:Somepony really took the time of their MLP to do life?
Olthar wrote:I prefer "I Came, I Saw, I Came Again."
Rupudska wrote:Except Nightkill, of course. Nightkill has obtained a level of badassery where his pants depart his legs of their own accord.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by New Harvest » Tue May 28, 2013 9:30 am
NEW HARVEST
▲▼▲
by San-Silvacian » Tue May 28, 2013 9:30 am
Sumarma wrote:The Army of Sumarma currently issues three different primary weapons to its soldiers.
The first is the PKP 6P41 machine gun. Also known as the "Pecheneg", this variant of the PKP was first introduced into the military in 2005, replacing the older M60 machine gun. Unlike the M60, the PKP 6P41 fired the 7.56mm x 56mm round, instead of the 7.56mm x 51mm NATO round, making it slightly more powerful. The PKP also has a higher rate of fire( up to 800 RPM in comparison to the M60s maximum of 650 RPM), and weighs less than the M60. However, it has a muzzle velocity and effective range, along with a longer barrel and higher recoil. The M60 was better suited for longer ranges, but the Sumarman army was better suited to mobility and closer range fighting in urban and forested environments and the M60 was. As a result, the lighter, faster firing PKP 6P41 became the new LMG of the Sumarman Armed Forces.
The second weapon is the MP7, replacing the Mp5. While both were produced by Heckler & Kock, the MP5 was older and fired the standard 9x19 parabellum round, which was weaker than the Mp7's 4.6 x 30mm round. The Mp7 also had lower recoil, amounting in hire ranges and better controllability. Critics argued that the weapon lost out on close range capability, which while being true, was made up for by the standard issued Glock machine pistols, which could be fired both at semi-auto and fully automatic.
There is no standard issue rifle as the M14, AK-74M, G36C, and the M4A1 are all available to soldiers based on their skill level with each weapon and their personal preference.
by Thalis » Tue May 28, 2013 9:38 am
New Harvest wrote:I think I might scrap the AK, since it is just not good enough, so I've restarted designing it, it will look somewhat like an AK, one of the more recent ak100 series variants.
anyway I have planned:
- bullpup configuration
- Built in rail system mounted on the upper receiver.
- peep sight, and the front sight can be folded down to not interfere with optics.
- L/R selective ejection system.
- chambered for 5.62x39 rounds (correct me if I'm wrong) or 7.62xsomething (Tell me which it is, it's russian not NATO) depending on the barrel, which can be easily and quickly changed, or maybe caseless ammo instead.
- rail uner the barel as to mount grenade launcher or forward grip, maybe I'll include a flash hider/ forward grip like on the OC-14 Groza.
- 30 round box mag.
- polymer construction.
- chrome lined bore which has 4 right hand rifle grooves, interchangeable lengths, 16, 18, 20? (modularity FTW)
- rotating bolt.
- can mount a undeside foldable stock attatchment if the user finds the gun to short, you shall see.
I need more reccomendations, it has to be modern.
by Ulfr-Reich » Tue May 28, 2013 9:48 am
by Anacasppia » Tue May 28, 2013 10:00 am
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.
Mmm... it's getting hot in here.
by Central and Eastern Visayas » Tue May 28, 2013 10:02 am
Anacasppia wrote:Looking closer, the logistics there is not that bad if one does not take into account the fact that he has multiple service rifles chambered in different cartridges. PDW in PDW round, GPMG in battle rifle round, and MMW in intermediate round is actually quite common.
by New Harvest » Tue May 28, 2013 10:16 am
Thalis wrote:New Harvest wrote:I think I might scrap the AK, since it is just not good enough, so I've restarted designing it, it will look somewhat like an AK, one of the more recent ak100 series variants.
anyway I have planned:
- bullpup configuration
- Built in rail system mounted on the upper receiver.
- peep sight, and the front sight can be folded down to not interfere with optics.
- L/R selective ejection system.
- chambered for 5.62x39 rounds (correct me if I'm wrong) or 7.62xsomething (Tell me which it is, it's russian not NATO) depending on the barrel, which can be easily and quickly changed, or maybe caseless ammo instead.
- rail uner the barel as to mount grenade launcher or forward grip, maybe I'll include a flash hider/ forward grip like on the OC-14 Groza.
- 30 round box mag.
- polymer construction.
- chrome lined bore which has 4 right hand rifle grooves, interchangeable lengths, 16, 18, 20? (modularity FTW)
- rotating bolt.
- can mount a undeside foldable stock attatchment if the user finds the gun to short, you shall see.
I need more reccomendations, it has to be modern.
- 'kay
- 'kay
- If you're going to have a rail system, why not just use RIS-attached BUIS?
- how is that going to work?
- 5.45x39 or 7.62x39? And using caseless ammo would change the design *radically*, so think about that
- 'kay
- 'kay
- 'kay
- 'kay, depends on the round you're firing and what you want to do with it
- 'kay
- On a bullpup rifle? Methinks not...
NEW HARVEST
▲▼▲
by Puzikas » Tue May 28, 2013 11:32 am
Sumarma wrote:The Army of Sumarma currently issues three different primary weapons to its soldiers.
The first is the PKP 6P41 machine gun. Also known as the "Pecheneg", this variant of the PKP was first introduced into the military in 2005, replacing the older M60 machine gun. Unlike the M60, the PKP 6P41 fired the 7.56mm x 56mm round, instead of the 7.56mm x 51mm NATO round, making it slightly more powerful. The PKP also has a higher rate of fire( up to 800 RPM in comparison to the M60s maximum of 650 RPM), and weighs less than the M60. However, it has a muzzle velocity and effective range, along with a longer barrel and higher recoil. The M60 was better suited for longer ranges, but the Sumarman army was better suited to mobility and closer range fighting in urban and forested environments and the M60 was. As a result, the lighter, faster firing PKP 6P41 became the new LMG of the Sumarman Armed Forces.
The second weapon is the MP7, replacing the Mp5. While both were produced by Heckler & Kock, the MP5 was older and fired the standard 9x19 parabellum round, which was weaker than the Mp7's 4.6 x 30mm round. The Mp7 also had lower recoil, amounting in hire ranges and better controllability. Critics argued that the weapon lost out on close range capability, which while being true, was made up for by the standard issued Glock machine pistols, which could be fired both at semi-auto and fully automatic.
There is no standard issue rifle as the M14, AK-74M, G36C, and the M4A1 are all available to soldiers based on their skill level with each weapon and their personal preference.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Black Hand » Tue May 28, 2013 11:57 am
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Benomia wrote:Guys, you'll never guess what just popped into my head.
So, the Gewer 43 had those sights. You know? Where it's like halfway down the rifle and practically flush with the receiver? Yeah. It had those sights.
So that style sight was carried over to the StG-44 when it was made, probably for commonality purposes.
When good ole Mikhail was making the AK, he had an StG-44 close by. The AK has those sights.
The AN-94, which took many cues from the AK, also has those sights.
You see what I mean? Russia is Nazi Germany!
The AN-94 does not share the AK sights.Bajireyn wrote:
Puzikas wrote:You clearly don't know about the baby bald eagle built into each one.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Why is there a "joke option" included in the poll when "yes" is already there?
Fordorsia wrote:Sight rib? Like a barbecue?
Fordorsia wrote:Why sell the restored weapons when you can keep them in a military-themed sex dungeon?
San-Silvacian wrote:Nothing says I love you like a fine Belgian firearm.
Bezombia wrote: "glorious discharge"
by New Harvest » Tue May 28, 2013 12:46 pm
NEW HARVEST
▲▼▲
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: HarYan
Advertisement