Does your nation own/are working on nukes?

[TurtleShroom]

we have nukes...lots of nukes

[Samozaryadnyastan]

Liège does not and will never have any nuclear weapons. They are overly destructive, and could kill too many innocent beings in the process of usage.

That's kind of the point...

[Auzkhia]

Yes, but the nuclear weapon stock is relatively small. It's only used for deterrence.

[The Parthians]

Yes. Deployed on a wide variety of weapons platforms, including, but not limited to: missiles ranging from short range to intercontinental ballistic, bombs, depth charges, land mines, artillery shells, artillery rockets, torpedoes, hand-carried demolition charges, tank shells, mortar rounds, and space platforms.

As to the number... It's more than the sum total of all previous posts in the thread.

[Solslivania]

YOU ASK TO MANY QUESTIONS

[Seaponies]

Yes. Deployed on a wide variety of weapons platforms, including, but not limited to: missiles ranging from short range to intercontinental ballistic, bombs, depth charges, land mines, artillery shells, artillery rockets, torpedoes, hand-carried demolition charges, tank shells, mortar rounds, and space platforms.

Nuclear...depth charges?

We're guessing they're dropped by airplanes or such; it's a bit hard to picture a ship's captain tossing a nuke overboard and yelling, "Full Speed Ahead!"

[The Parthians]

Yes. Deployed on a wide variety of weapons platforms, including, but not limited to: missiles ranging from short range to intercontinental ballistic, bombs, depth charges, land mines, artillery shells, artillery rockets, torpedoes, hand-carried demolition charges, tank shells, mortar rounds, and space platforms.

Nuclear...depth charges?

We're guessing they're dropped by airplanes or such; it's a bit hard to picture a ship's captain tossing a nuke overboard and yelling, "Full Speed Ahead!"

Helicopter or aircraft dropped, though we also have ASROC type systems that launch depth charges via rocket.

[Samozaryadnyastan]

Yes. Deployed on a wide variety of weapons platforms, including, but not limited to: missiles ranging from short range to intercontinental ballistic, bombs, depth charges, land mines, artillery shells, artillery rockets, torpedoes, hand-carried demolition charges, tank shells, mortar rounds, and space platforms.

Nuclear...depth charges?

We're guessing they're dropped by airplanes or such; it's a bit hard to picture a ship's captain tossing a nuke overboard and yelling, "Full Speed Ahead!"

Typically, such munitions would actually have been carried by helicopters.
Or launched with rockets from the ship.

[Lesbia]

Yes, Lesbia has a rather large nuclear program.

[Kota land]

Nukes? We dont need them. We have better.
WE HAVE BLACK HOLE WEAPONS THAT CAN WIPE OUT STARS, SECTORS AND EVEN GALAXIES!

i smell godmodding

[Ieperithem]

Quite a few. Some bioweapons too. We only use them when not doing so would have a worse end result. Of course, worse is subject to dispute, and that is why we have so many nukes.

[Black cats luck]

No, I believe nukes are a wasteful weapon to have. It is immoral and wrong. I get that nukes sorta end wars (Like WW2) but isn't nesisary to own them.

[Kalmarium]

Nukes? We dont need them. We have better.
WE HAVE BLACK HOLE WEAPONS THAT CAN WIPE OUT STARS, SECTORS AND EVEN GALAXIES!

How incredibly inefficient.

[Valkalan]

The Empire possess a sizable quantity of nuclear arms, along with many other powerful weapons. Exact figures are classified.

[Tundunistan]

No. If you're located on the relatively earthquake prone Ring of Fire in the Pacific, ground stability is questionable at best. Picture a nuclear weapons silo in the middle of an earthquake...

[New Freedomstan]

We have many nuke. How many, we not sure any more. We used to have hundred of thousand. We spent a lot on ourselves. Now we have probably ten of thousand. Probably.

[Awesome Break-Away of 250land]

*Minister of Foreign Affairs opens door and yells down the corridor* "Mike! do we still have any nukes bro!?" let me check ... *Mike the Minister of Defence rifles through the mountain of papers on his desk while shouting at a secretary* ... some time later ... Umm.. there's a warehouse in ***CENSURI DE IQU*** and a few left along the Ramon River "From the Holy Geneva war?" Something like that!

[Astracarn]

No, Astracarn does not have any nukes, nor does it plan to work on any in the foreseeable future.

[The Roman Catholic Kingdoms]

That's confidential information

[Rov]

Nuclear weapons are viewed as outdated by the vastly superior yet more expensive antimatter warhead, or the vastly more cost-effective mass driver.

[Nachfolgia]

The Nachfolgian Reich has developed and owns a large stockpile of nuclear weapons and other biological and chemical weapons.

[Arzonja]

Not yet, but we have eggheads hard at work developing a functional nuclear arsenal.

[Hockenberg]

No, waste of money.

[Samozaryadnyastan]

No. If you're located on the relatively earthquake prone Ring of Fire in the Pacific, ground stability is questionable at best. Picture a nuclear weapons silo in the middle of an earthquake...

Unless the fault line and subsidence tries to occur directly down the middle of a silo tube, you're fine. Silos have to deal with the threat of nuclear strikes, their hardening will probably be sufficient to survive earthquake.

Besides, if anything, this is one hell of an argument for you to instead deploy your nuclear weapons from aircraft, subs and mobile-launcher ICBMs.
Things that are, by their very nature, much harder to find and kill than a static silo. Exactly why the Russians and Americans (not sure the US still uses mobile ground launchers though) still use all three in conjunction with silos.

[Romberg]

Nukes? We dont need them. We have better.
WE HAVE BLACK HOLE WEAPONS THAT CAN WIPE OUT STARS, SECTORS AND EVEN GALAXIES!

i smell godmodding

To be fair, they're a FT nation, although yes galaxies may be a stretch.