NationStates

GHawkins wrote:

Lubyak wrote:Culturally, the nation is willing to accept 'sacrifices in the name of the greater good'. While the population may start protesting if they see soldier dieing for no particular reason, they're relatively fine as long as soldier's lives are being 'spent' not 'wasted'.

Then you could do for the T-84. It's not as protected as the Challenger II as far as I know. But the Challenger has like.. quite ridiculous survivability, if you consider what is thrown at it. Two challengers have ever been knocked out of action and only one destroyed, by another Challenger even.

If you go for the Challenger II, like I have, you're really going for the survivability. Though they can only be fielded in lesser quality, taking into consideration the cost of one.

T-84 isn't really known by me. Though I can almost certainly say they are cheaper than the Challenger both in base cost and in operation.

Really, it's your call.

Lubyak wrote:
Well, I've got my own vehicles--both for sale in my storefront! One is a T-84 inspired vehicle, while the other is much more western inspired, including a heavy metal layer and a larger turret to incorporate a longer round. The main thing I was curious about was the doctrine I had posted up last page, which included different styles of armoured divisions for different jobs.

Lubyak wrote:

GHawkins wrote:
Then you could do for the T-84. It's not as protected as the Challenger II as far as I know. But the Challenger has like.. quite ridiculous survivability, if you consider what is thrown at it. Two challengers have ever been knocked out of action and only one destroyed, by another Challenger even.

If you go for the Challenger II, like I have, you're really going for the survivability. Though they can only be fielded in lesser quality, taking into consideration the cost of one.

T-84 isn't really known by me. Though I can almost certainly say they are cheaper than the Challenger both in base cost and in operation.

Really, it's your call.

Well, I've got my own vehicles--both for sale in my storefront! One is a T-84 inspired vehicle, while the other is much more western inspired, including a heavy metal layer and a larger turret to incorporate a longer round. The main thing I was curious about was the doctrine I had posted up last page, which included different styles of armoured divisions for different jobs.

GHawkins wrote:

Lubyak wrote:
Well, I've got my own vehicles--both for sale in my storefront! One is a T-84 inspired vehicle, while the other is much more western inspired, including a heavy metal layer and a larger turret to incorporate a longer round. The main thing I was curious about was the doctrine I had posted up last page, which included different styles of armoured divisions for different jobs.

I'll read up on it. I saw you also posted it on the other topic so I guess, because we reached 500, we'll be directing the replies to there.