Myth: the Desert Eagle was designed by Magnum Research in 'Murricah, and the production was contracted out to Israeli Weapons' Industries in Israel. Once made, they were shipped right back to the United States.
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:Hey, helical magazines... Y/N?
I know, no huge advantages over traditional mags...
However, they can be stored indefinitely without having to worry about spring degradation, which is a huge plus since I intend to distribute/store all PMT small arms ammunition in preloaded magazines.
That and, they seem to have higher capacities than standard magazines. I know, they achieve this by being longer, but I've got quite a bit of space between the pistol grip and magazine well tthat can be used.
Also myth: you can store loaded magazines for an indefinite amount of time assuming the feed lips don't bend themselves out of shape (PMags and STANAGs, I be lookin' at you). Constant pressure on a spring won't wear it out. Repeated tension/no-tension (loading, unloading, etc.) several, several hundred times will. That's why you can store a rifle with its hammer back.
Veceria wrote:Roskraina wrote:Any major differences between Austrian and US made Steyr weapons?
Regarding the Desert Eagle talk earlier, is noone interested in a gold plated or a tiger striped DE? If for nothing else just to have one
US made Steyr weapons exists? That's new to me ...
Australian, on the other hand ...
Generally said - some newer Steyr stuff might look tacticool, but their quality is still close to Swiss stuff.
Yep: there's a couple factories in the US making AUGs: MISR and Steyr. I've piddled around with both, and they seem pretty solidly-built. Semi-automatic only, of course, and the Steyrs are available with regular AUG magazines or a STANAG-compatible "NATO" version.
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Apart from the fully automatic and helical mags, yeah.
Some units still do.
http://www.americanspecialops.com/image ... -mod-0.jpg
Apart from the full-auto, helical mags, and .30-06 cartridge he mentioned, that is.
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Registug wrote:I didn't read the helical mags part.
But I thought M14s were (at least some of them) full auto, and that was what separated them from M1s?
A full-auto variant was planned to replace the BAR as an infantry automatic rifle, but I don't think it reached the intended deployment numbers, for whatever reason.
All early M14s were giggle-switch-equipped. Turns out, full-auto 7.62 NATO is a bitchdicking to control, so they started equipping the rifles with sear blocks so they couldn't be switched to full-auto.
GMC Military Arms wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:A full-auto variant was planned to replace the BAR as an infantry automatic rifle, but I don't think it reached the intended deployment numbers, for whatever reason.
Early M14s were full-auto, but it fell into the same "wishful thinking" category as things like the FG42; the M14 is too light for any soldier who forgot to become a giant ogre to handle it in full-auto. It was supposed to replace the M3, M1 Garand, M1 Carbine and BAR all at once, but ended up being the shortest-issued standard rifle in the history of the US military.
You didn't happen to be in the #TerraFirma IRC channel last night, did you? I made mention of this exact thing.
EDIT TO ADD: