NationStates

Let it not be said that Hungarians have no swag.

Im okay with lighter vehicles, as long as we keep on topic of armorment at least.

Because this is the fastest moving thread.

Edit:

GMC Military Arms wrote:Pulled the world.guns link from the OP; unless Max Popenker has started checking his ads for malicious java, the usefulness of that site is substantially offset by the fact that it's a digital plague pit.

Also looking over the intro:

Puzikas wrote:A helpful infograph, besides the AK at the bottom

Well, if splitting hairs, IIRC the AKU-94 stock is quite capable of having an authentic AK-47 action stuffed into it. Could be worse, could be that Centre Balanced Systems abomination.

He has indeed begun scanning..Though I haven't had a single issue in over a year. So if its alright with you, I would like to keep it up.

Also, its the profile more than anything, per the Kalashnikov. While yes an AK-47 could fit in it, its somewhat incorrect to call it an AK-47 in the traditional sense, as people may think it was originally a Bulpup. Though I can see your argument.

Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)

Only Hungarians can make something that should look horrible look good but still make it look horrible at the same time.

Puzikas wrote:Im okay with lighter vehicles, as long as we keep on topic of armorment at least.

Because this is the fastest moving thread.

Well I'm currently debating adding an OTO Melara 76 mm Super Rapido to my tank

Risen Britannia wrote:

Puzikas wrote:Im okay with lighter vehicles, as long as we keep on topic of armorment at least.

Because this is the fastest moving thread.

Well I'm currently debating adding an OTO Melara 76 mm Super Rapido to my tank

*squints* Not sure if joking due to emoticon usage...

MISGUIDED COMRADES OF HUNGARY HAVE COMMIT GRAVE SIN OF HERESY. GLORIOUS RIFLE OF EAST BLOCK NOT TO TOUCH FILTHY ACCESSORY OF CAPITALIST PIGDOG.

Woah. Looks like I got...possessed. To be serious, that AG36 looks very out of place.

An M320's just a short-barrel AG36, right?

Samozaryadnyastan wrote:An M320's just a short-barrel AG36, right?

Basically yes, although the M320 can be used as a standalone weapon.

The gun control debate is afoot again. Here's a short collection of scary black rifles

Samozaryadnyastan wrote:An M320's just a short-barrel AG36, right?

Rail-mounted AG36 (ie AG-C). Unlike the AG-C it has a front grip and finger guard that are fixed, while if the AG-C has them they're mounted to a front lower rail.

Nua Corda wrote:The gun control debate is afoot again. Here's a short collection of scary black rifles

(Image)
(Image)
(Image)
(Image)

That Enfield looks rather...good. Is it heresy if I want it?
Also that AK has wood, so it's perfectly safe.

The Akasha Colony wrote:

Risen Britannia wrote:Well I'm currently debating adding an OTO Melara 76 mm Super Rapido to my tank

*squints* Not sure if joking due to emoticon usage...

Problem?

Nua Corda wrote:The gun control debate is afoot again. Here's a short collection of scary black rifles

(Image)
(Image)
(Image)
(Image)

Top one looks like my standard weapon in Blacklight: Retribution

Fordorsia wrote:

Nua Corda wrote:The gun control debate is afoot again. Here's a short collection of scary black rifles

(Image)
(Image)
(Image)
(Image)

That Enfield looks rather...good. Is it heresy if I want it?
Also that AK has wood, so it's perfectly safe.

BURN THE HERETIC!

GMC Military Arms wrote:

Samozaryadnyastan wrote:An M320's just a short-barrel AG36, right?

Rail-mounted AG36 (ie AG-C). Unlike the AG-C it has a front grip and finger guard that are fixed, while if the AG-C has them they're mounted to a front lower rail.

Le me been thinking too German

I has scary black guns too. Not only is they scary, these guns they has secrets.

GMC Military Arms wrote:I has scary black guns too. Not only is they scary, these guns they has secrets.

(Image)

Sten

(Image)

Ruger 10-22

(Image)

STUPID

Dammit! you got me with the last Quote

GMC Military Arms wrote:I has scary black guns too. Not only is they scary, these guns they has secrets.

(Image)

Sten

(Image)

Ruger 10-22

(Image)

STUPID

Is it bad that I like the Sten?

Risen Britannia wrote:Is it bad that I like the Sten?

Not really, a regular Sten looks like it was built accidentally by a confused plumber.

Nua Corda wrote:

Fordorsia wrote:
That Enfield looks rather...good. Is it heresy if I want it?
Also that AK has wood, so it's perfectly safe.

BURN THE HERETIC!

Joke's on you. I always wanted to die via purging. Although a Salamander executioner would be more preferred.

GMC Military Arms wrote:(Image)

STUPID

The Zip-22 should not exist in any universe.

Name: 10x22mm NACO
MV: 350 m/s
Energy: 485 ft/lbs / 658J
Range: 60m

Aqizithiuda wrote:Name: 10x22mm NACO
MV: 350 m/s
Energy: 485 ft/lbs / 658J
Range: 60m

Noted.

Aqizithiuda wrote:

The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:Hey, helical magazines... Y/N?

I know, no huge advantages over traditional mags...

However, they can be stored indefinitely without having to worry about spring degradation, which is a huge plus since I intend to distribute/store all PMT small arms ammunition in preloaded magazines.

That and, they seem to have higher capacities than standard magazines. I know, they achieve this by being longer, but I've got quite a bit of space between the pistol grip and magazine well tthat can be used.

You can fit one 50 round, 9x19mm helical magazine as the same space as four 30 round 9x19mm magazines. That's 50 rounds vs 120 rounds.

I'll be honest, yo me it looks a lot closer to two box mags to one helical mag.
That puts it as either two 32 round boxes or one 64 round helical.

GMC Military Arms wrote:

Risen Britannia wrote:Is it bad that I like the Sten?

Not really, a regular Sten looks like it was built accidentally by a confused plumber.

That's a funny mental image right there.