No.
No.
EDIT:

Advertisement

by Nua Corda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:51 pm


by Yes Im Biop » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:52 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:53 pm
Yes Im Biop wrote:Sure it is. It's a .223 Calliber bullet with a big Case.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:54 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Benomia » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:57 pm
Nua Corda wrote:Benomia wrote:Is there any functional difference between a milled, machined, stamped, or 3D printed receiver (I know that last one is a stretch, but oh well)?
Yes.
Milled: Tends to be stronger and often lends more accuracy, but more expensive and tighter tolerances. Also heavier.
Machined: Like milled, but crappier.
Stamped: light, cheap and easy to mass-produce. Looser tolerances can mean less accuracy, but more reliability.
3D-printed: Like milled, but lighter and flimsier.
Yes Im Biop wrote:I can't remember where I heard it but apperatly the US is switching to the SCAR platform.
Gods fuck you google. I liked my rounded options why you fuck that up?!
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:You've obviously never seen the Benomian M16A3s.
Carathon wrote:*Logs in with the name of Troll Alliance and writes a short app with poor grammar and logic.*Somehow genuinely surprised when denied*
Ragnarum wrote:Ragnarum transforms into a giant godzilla like creature, then walks into the sunset while emotional music plays and Morgan Freeman narrates.
Kouralia wrote:Everyone hates us: we're MMW. We're like the poster children of Realismfggtry.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben

by San-Silvacian » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:58 pm

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:59 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:00 pm
Bajireyn wrote:Hey, guys, would it possible to fire CTA rounds with an AK action?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:01 pm
Yes Im Biop wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
Try carrying eight 7.62 magazines when they weight 1.5 pounds each.
You can carry 12 5.56 magazines. 360 > 160
pls lrn 2 army
Use Caseless. Or that Nifty Backpack i saw somewhere. AT least if your using Varmit rounds use JHP If not full HP if your fighting known unarmored opponents.

by San-Silvacian » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:03 pm
Yes Im Biop wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
Try carrying eight 7.62 magazines when they weight 1.5 pounds each.
You can carry 12 5.56 magazines. 360 > 160
pls lrn 2 army
Use Caseless. Or that Nifty Backpack i saw somewhere. AT least if your using Varmit rounds use JHP If not full HP if your fighting known unarmored opponents.
San-Silvacian wrote:pls lrn 2 army

by Nua Corda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:03 pm

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:05 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Lolzieristan » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:06 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:Yes Im Biop wrote:
Use Caseless. Or that Nifty Backpack i saw somewhere. AT least if your using Varmit rounds use JHP If not full HP if your fighting known unarmored opponents.
Because replacing millions of 5.56 rounds with caseless in a few years is possible.
What will a backpack do? Only take away space you need for supplies
JHP and HP are bad for a modern military. Ball is srs best because HP and JHP have issues with accuracy and range. Also if you hit a civie, their changes of living just went from moderate to fuck no.San-Silvacian wrote:pls lrn 2 army

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:07 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:Yes Im Biop wrote:
Use Caseless. Or that Nifty Backpack i saw somewhere. AT least if your using Varmit rounds use JHP If not full HP if your fighting known unarmored opponents.
Because replacing millions of 5.56 rounds with caseless in a few years is possible.
What will a backpack do? Only take away space you need for supplies
JHP and HP are bad for a modern military. Ball is srs best because HP and JHP have issues with accuracy and range. Also if you hit a civie, their changes of living just went from moderate to fuck no.San-Silvacian wrote:pls lrn 2 army
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Nua Corda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:07 pm

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:08 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:09 pm
Yes Im Biop wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
Because replacing millions of 5.56 rounds with caseless in a few years is possible.
What will a backpack do? Only take away space you need for supplies
JHP and HP are bad for a modern military. Ball is srs best because HP and JHP have issues with accuracy and range. Also if you hit a civie, their changes of living just went from moderate to fuck no.
If you hit an enemy combatent with said rounds their chances of living went from moderate to fuck no. I'd say it's an acceptable trade.
Not possible. The Armed forces moves to slow for that.
Give you quite a bunch of ammo to 1 person, Have another carry the suplise.

by Nua Corda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:11 pm

by Black Hand » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:31 pm
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Yes Im Biop wrote:
If you hit an enemy combatent with said rounds their chances of living went from moderate to fuck no. I'd say it's an acceptable trade.
Not possible. The Armed forces moves to slow for that.
Give you quite a bunch of ammo to 1 person, Have another carry the suplise.
Biop just stop.
Puzikas wrote:You clearly don't know about the baby bald eagle built into each one.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Why is there a "joke option" included in the poll when "yes" is already there?
Fordorsia wrote:Sight rib? Like a barbecue?
Fordorsia wrote:Why sell the restored weapons when you can keep them in a military-themed sex dungeon?
San-Silvacian wrote:Nothing says I love you like a fine Belgian firearm.
Bezombia wrote: "glorious discharge"

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:40 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Hurtful Thoughts » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:51 pm
Yes Im Biop wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
Try carrying eight 7.62 magazines when they weight 1.5 pounds each.
You can carry 12 5.56 magazines. 360 > 160
pls lrn 2 army
Use Caseless. Or that Nifty Backpack i saw somewhere. AT least if your using Varmit rounds use JHP If not full HP if your fighting known unarmored opponents.
What, in reference to the re-adoption of the 7.62?
I can see where the mistake might have come from, since I heard it from a friend who's not...as crazy as us in terms of this stuff. He could have read something about the SCAR, thought "SCAR-H" instead of "SCAR-L", and told me 7.62.
But I can also see how it might be a side effect of the "preparing for the previous war" syndrome in military R&D. Afghanistan has much longer engagement ranges than the >300yds of conventional wisdom. Thus the M14 and it's children are re-emerging on the field.
But I doubt another switch will occur, unless it's to something drastic like caseless.
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....

by Fordorsia » Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:23 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:24 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by San-Silvacian » Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:26 pm
Yes Im Biop wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
Because replacing millions of 5.56 rounds with caseless in a few years is possible.
What will a backpack do? Only take away space you need for supplies
JHP and HP are bad for a modern military. Ball is srs best because HP and JHP have issues with accuracy and range. Also if you hit a civie, their changes of living just went from moderate to fuck no.
If you hit an enemy combatent with said rounds their chances of living went from moderate to fuck no. I'd say it's an acceptable trade.
Not possible. The Armed forces moves to slow for that.
Give you quite a bunch of ammo to 1 person, Have another carry the suplise.
Lolzieristan wrote:San-Silvacian wrote:
Because replacing millions of 5.56 rounds with caseless in a few years is possible.
What will a backpack do? Only take away space you need for supplies
JHP and HP are bad for a modern military. Ball is srs best because HP and JHP have issues with accuracy and range. Also if you hit a civie, their changes of living just went from moderate to fuck no.
*shifty eyes*
*slips balaclava on civvie's head, pulls PM out of patrol pack, wipes grip, places in hand.*
Combatant!
So much easier to justify a dead civvie than a civvie with a bullet in his leg.
Black Hand wrote:Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Biop just stop.
Though he does have one valid point advocating less effective/powerful weapons on the theory that if you hit a civilian they have no chance of survival is Not a valid one. Civvies don't survive 2000 lb bombs very well either USAF solution 500 lb bombs that Still kill civvies just less of them. A weapon is is Designed to kill people it is a poor and cruel weapon that is designed only to wound.
Yes Im Biop wrote:What?
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Anastasica, HarYan, The Corparation, Unis Norada
Advertisement