NATION

PASSWORD

Main Military Weapon of your Country: Pattern VIII (Read OP)

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will OP MMW Number 9?

Nua Corda
75
39%
Kouralia
25
13%
Spreewerke
46
24%
Coltarin
21
11%
Aqizithiuda
26
13%
 
Total votes : 193

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:23 pm

Tule wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Still not that bad. Current US Army loadout is ~75lbs when everything is being carried. Soldiers will ditch whatever is useless.


I'm trying to keep the combat load under 25 Kg (55 lbs)


Use Caseless ammo? Lighter or less armor, Probably a smaller caliber gun if Caseless isn't available
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:25 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
Tule wrote:
I'm trying to keep the combat load under 25 Kg (55 lbs)


Use Caseless ammo? Lighter or less armor, Probably a smaller caliber gun if Caseless isn't available


Nuh uh.

...

But they hardly need two kidneys, do they?
Last edited by Tule on Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:26 pm

Tule wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Use Caseless ammo? Lighter or less armor, Probably a smaller caliber gun if Caseless isn't available


Nuh uh.

...

But they hardly need two kidneys, do they?


Uh... Soldier's I think would...
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Puzikas
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10941
Founded: Nov 24, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Puzikas » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:28 pm

Tule wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:
Standard issue post Vietnam was three 20 round mags, six if you were line infantry. I'm not sure how many mags were issued to in infantry - I remember something about it being 4 or 5 mags, but can't be sure - but on at least one occasion troops ran low on ammunition, had some dropped to them, ran over to the ammo tins and found that they needed to load individual rounds. This, IIRC, lead to more magazines being issued to combat troops.

I, personally, would issue five to seven 30 round magazines, plus 180 rounds or so on 10 round clips.


AK ammo is heavy ;_;

Especially if you use 150 gr bullets like me (apparently it improves the ballistics immensely.)


AK ammo is heavy if your out of shape, maybe.
My PK gunner carried over 400 rounds of belted standard and Tracer, along with standard gear and never once did he complain.
Except for once. But it was hot. So excusable.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

Goodbye.

User avatar
Aqizithiuda
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12163
Founded: Jun 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aqizithiuda » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:30 pm

Tule wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:
Not as heavy as 7.62 NATO.

What MV are you getting with the 150gr loading?


About 2200 FPS at the muzzle out of a 16' barrel.

At 100 yards it catches up with the 123 grain bullets.


Not bad at all.

Tule wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Still not that bad. Current US Army loadout is ~75lbs when everything is being carried. Soldiers will ditch whatever is useless.


I'm trying to keep the combat load under 25 Kg (55 lbs)


I doubt 3kg would make too big a difference in the grand scheme of things.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.


Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.


Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.


Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...


Live fire is not an effective means of communication.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:32 pm

Tule wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Still not that bad. Current US Army loadout is ~75lbs when everything is being carried. Soldiers will ditch whatever is useless.


I'm trying to keep the combat load under 25 Kg (55 lbs)



You'll be fine. Loaded AK magazine weight is ~1.8lbs when using steel, I believe. That's barely above ten pounds for six magazines. If you're using Bulgarian Circle-Ten polymer magazines, it will probably be ~7lbs or so, guessing (can't find weights for them readily). That is 180 rounds on-hand in loaded magazines.

I have a bent spine and I was okay with carrying seven AK magazines (when counting the rifle's), while also wearing full cold-weather gear. Not nearly as inclusive as a military, per se, but it was far more heavy than I typically go.

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:36 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Tule wrote:
I'm trying to keep the combat load under 25 Kg (55 lbs)



You'll be fine. Loaded AK magazine weight is ~1.8lbs when using steel, I believe. That's barely above ten pounds for six magazines. If you're using Bulgarian Circle-Ten polymer magazines, it will probably be ~7lbs or so, guessing (can't find weights for them readily). That is 180 rounds on-hand in loaded magazines.

I have a bent spine and I was okay with carrying seven AK magazines (when counting the rifle's), while also wearing full cold-weather gear. Not nearly as inclusive as a military, per se, but it was far more heavy than I typically go.


Rk 95 mags weigh 160 grams each.

Should probably be reliable enough if a military trusts them.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
GMC Military Arms
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 52
Founded: Antiquity
Libertarian Police State

Postby GMC Military Arms » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:40 pm

Sevvania wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:
Those are GMPGs.

I already have the MG3.

The only difference between a GPMG and an LMG is how you use it, from my understanding. I think they're pretty much interchangeable terms.


Strictly it's medium machine gun and GPMG that are mostly interchangeable. The classic definitions are:

LMG: Designed for short bursts while mobile, firing from a bipod. Modern versions usually use intermediate rounds.

MMG: Designed for sustained fire while stationary, firing from a tripod and almost always using a belt feed. Generally the definition requires it use a full-size rifle round.

GPMG: Able to perform in either role, essentially a light MMG.

There's a few confusing ones like one of the QB-series which is classified as a GPMG even though it uses an intermediate round, or the PKP which I hear is deployed as an LMG (bipod only). Or those crap Japanese WW2 Hotchkiss clones which didn't have a belt feed, fired rifle bullets and were only classified as "heavy" because they somehow weighed as much as US 50 cals.

User avatar
Idaho Conservatives
Minister
 
Posts: 3066
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Idaho Conservatives » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:44 pm

Puzikas wrote:My PK gunner carried over 400 rounds of belted standard and Tracer, along with standard gear and never once did he complain.
Except for once. But it was hot. So excusable.


I got an image in my mind of me packing around a spam can of 7.62 for an entire day, and just thinking about it makes my back hurt.
"Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way" --General George S. Patton

If You're A Fellow Ham, TG me!!!
KF7LCE

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:45 pm

Idaho Conservatives wrote:
Puzikas wrote:My PK gunner carried over 400 rounds of belted standard and Tracer, along with standard gear and never once did he complain.
Except for once. But it was hot. So excusable.


I got an image in my mind of me packing around a spam can of 7.62 for an entire day, and just thinking about it makes my back hurt.



Lift with the legs! :lol2:

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:47 pm

Would it be unreasonable to expect every member of the squad to carry a 50-100 round belt of 7.5 Swiss in addition to their full combat load?
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Bajireyn
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Bajireyn » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:47 pm

Risen Britannia wrote:(Image)

Looks like a lolcod gun.

GMC Military Arms wrote:I has scary black guns too. Not only is they scary, these guns they has secrets.

(Image)

Is it bad that I really like this gun?

Also, is that really a sten?
Right behind you...: UDL

User avatar
Aqizithiuda
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12163
Founded: Jun 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aqizithiuda » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:55 pm

Purpelia wrote:Would it be unreasonable to expect every member of the squad to carry a 50-100 round belt of 7.5 Swiss in addition to their full combat load?


That depends on their loadout. I'm think yes in regards to every single member carrying a belt.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.


Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.


Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.


Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...


Live fire is not an effective means of communication.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:56 pm

Purpelia wrote:Would it be unreasonable to expect every member of the squad to carry a 50-100 round belt of 7.5 Swiss in addition to their full combat load?

Not at all. If your pack is as light as mine you should have ample room.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Puzikas
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10941
Founded: Nov 24, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Puzikas » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:00 pm

Idaho Conservatives wrote:
Puzikas wrote:My PK gunner carried over 400 rounds of belted standard and Tracer, along with standard gear and never once did he complain.
Except for once. But it was hot. So excusable.


I got an image in my mind of me packing around a spam can of 7.62 for an entire day, and just thinking about it makes my back hurt.


Then carry a 19lb gun.

He had really big arms. I then that were like 420mm.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

Goodbye.

User avatar
Aqizithiuda
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12163
Founded: Jun 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aqizithiuda » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:05 pm

Puzikas wrote:
Idaho Conservatives wrote:
I got an image in my mind of me packing around a spam can of 7.62 for an entire day, and just thinking about it makes my back hurt.


Then carry a 19lb gun.

He had really big arms. I then that were like 420mm.


Speaking of carrying a heavy load, how many rounds of 9x70mm do you think your average gunner could carry with your MG?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.


Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.


Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.


Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...


Live fire is not an effective means of communication.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:07 pm

Puzikas wrote:
Idaho Conservatives wrote:
I got an image in my mind of me packing around a spam can of 7.62 for an entire day, and just thinking about it makes my back hurt.


Then carry a 19lb gun.

He had really big arms. I then that were like 420mm.



Image

User avatar
Puzikas
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10941
Founded: Nov 24, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Puzikas » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:08 pm

Aqizithiuda wrote:
Puzikas wrote:
Then carry a 19lb gun.

He had really big arms. I then that were like 420mm.


Speaking of carrying a heavy load, how many rounds of 9x70mm do you think your average gunner could carry with your MG?


Probably 200-400, but 400 would be the most.

Spreewerke wrote:
Puzikas wrote:
Then carry a 19lb gun.

He had really big arms. I then that were like 420mm.



Image


Never fails to make me laugh.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

Goodbye.

User avatar
Aqizithiuda
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12163
Founded: Jun 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aqizithiuda » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:11 pm

Puzikas wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:
Speaking of carrying a heavy load, how many rounds of 9x70mm do you think your average gunner could carry with your MG?


Probably 200-400, but 400 would be the most.

Spreewerke wrote:

Image


Never fails to make me laugh.

About what I was thinking, then.

Thanks!
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.


Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.


Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.


Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...


Live fire is not an effective means of communication.

User avatar
Lonara
Diplomat
 
Posts: 841
Founded: Feb 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Lonara » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:17 pm

The Lonaran High Army uses the HLA-3 rifle platform.

7.62x39mm
Fully Automatic/Semi Automatic
Twenty Round Magazine
620 rounds p/minute
Optimum Range: 500 Yards

No caseless ammo, no Jesus Christ powers, it's just a well put together gun that can be easily maintained while keeping the accuracy and some of the range of her competitors.
I'm sick of all of these god damned fancy guns...
Krianian Civil War: Strategic Victory
War Against Allied Amerikka: Victory
Ketrilyian Nuclear Crisis: Victory
War on West Ganicistan: Withdraw
Lonaran Civil War: Victory
Eins - Nuclear War
Swei - High Intensity Conventional War
Drei - Conventional War
Vier - Interventionary Conflict
[Funf] - Increased Tensions
Sechs - Lowest Concern

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:24 pm

Lonara wrote:The Lonaran High Army uses the HLA-3 rifle platform.

7.62x39mm
Fully Automatic/Semi Automatic
Twenty Round Magazine
620 rounds p/minute
Optimum Range: 500 Yards

No caseless ammo, no Jesus Christ powers, it's just a well put together gun that can be easily maintained while keeping the accuracy and some of the range of her competitors.
I'm sick of all of these god damned fancy guns...



Good thing it's easy to maintain, because you can expect jams every magazine.

User avatar
Lonara
Diplomat
 
Posts: 841
Founded: Feb 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Lonara » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:25 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Lonara wrote:The Lonaran High Army uses the HLA-3 rifle platform.

7.62x39mm
Fully Automatic/Semi Automatic
Twenty Round Magazine
620 rounds p/minute
Optimum Range: 500 Yards

No caseless ammo, no Jesus Christ powers, it's just a well put together gun that can be easily maintained while keeping the accuracy and some of the range of her competitors.
I'm sick of all of these god damned fancy guns...



Good thing it's easy to maintain, because you can expect jams every magazine.


When coupled with a standard issue Lonaran bayonet, this weapon also makes an excellent spear.
Krianian Civil War: Strategic Victory
War Against Allied Amerikka: Victory
Ketrilyian Nuclear Crisis: Victory
War on West Ganicistan: Withdraw
Lonaran Civil War: Victory
Eins - Nuclear War
Swei - High Intensity Conventional War
Drei - Conventional War
Vier - Interventionary Conflict
[Funf] - Increased Tensions
Sechs - Lowest Concern

User avatar
3 State Alliance
Minister
 
Posts: 3331
Founded: Jul 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 3 State Alliance » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:27 pm

Image


The Tiger .333 family, from the top:
Standard
Marksman
"Tiger Cub" select-fire carbine

Based heavily on the Dragunov SVD and firing a modification of the Lapua .338 round, this rifle can fire a round 1.6 kilometers (indirect) with an effective range of 850 meters in average conditions. The Tiger is semi-automatic but the carbine edition is capable of fully-automatic fire. With either a 16 or 23 round clip this rifle and its variants are able to serve many roles.
Weighing 25lbs loaded and constructed from machined steel the Tiger is Virtually indestructible, this added to the significant range and power of the weapon has helped reduce causalities among the unarmored Troopers.
In recent years a new version has been released, in 330 that includes wood hardware and a rifle grenade launcher but the classic Tiger is still being issued by the thousand.
Last edited by 3 State Alliance on Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Lets introduce these savages to the 20th century! All ranks, fire at will."
Commissar Maria Smith, The Siege of High Reach

User avatar
Puzikas
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10941
Founded: Nov 24, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Puzikas » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:28 pm

Lonara wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

Good thing it's easy to maintain, because you can expect jams every magazine.


When coupled with a standard issue Lonaran bayonet, this weapon also makes an excellent spear.


Range of a spear: 30 meters
Range of a standard infantry rifle: 300m+

Re-work the rifle. Are you going for a design similar to that of the Kalashnikov?
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

Goodbye.

User avatar
Lonara
Diplomat
 
Posts: 841
Founded: Feb 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Lonara » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:28 pm

3 State Alliance wrote:
The Tiger .333 family, from the top:
Standard
Marksman
"Tiger Cub" select-fire carbine

Based heavily on the Dragunov SVD and firing a modification of the Lapua .338 round, this rifle can fire a round 1.6 kilometers (indirect) with an effective range of 850 meters in average conditions. The Tiger is semi-automatic but the carbine edition is capable of fully-automatic fire. With either a 16 or 23 round clip this rifle and its variants are able to serve many roles.
Weighing 25lbs loaded and constructed from machined steel the Tiger is Virtually indestructible, this added to the significant range and power of the weapon has helped reduce causalities among the unarmored Troopers.
In recent years a new version has been released, in 330 that includes wood hardware and a rifle grenade launcher but the classic Tiger is still being issued by the thousand.



....Twenty five pounds?
Krianian Civil War: Strategic Victory
War Against Allied Amerikka: Victory
Ketrilyian Nuclear Crisis: Victory
War on West Ganicistan: Withdraw
Lonaran Civil War: Victory
Eins - Nuclear War
Swei - High Intensity Conventional War
Drei - Conventional War
Vier - Interventionary Conflict
[Funf] - Increased Tensions
Sechs - Lowest Concern

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads