Yeah, like the Argentines.
Advertisement

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 16, 2016 11:19 am

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 16, 2016 2:13 pm
Halfblakistan wrote:Like Rhodesialund said, force projection. I want to support socialist insurgencies in other countries and need a naval air wing and troop landing capability.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 16, 2016 2:21 pm
Purpelia wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:As an "small island nation" per your own words, this is political and strategic suicide. A small island nation like for example New Zealand simply do not have the resources to extend its political clout further than their own regional sphere and if there's a bigger neighbour in there they are literally reduced to irrelevancy. If you want to expand les Socialist Internationale play a bigger nation.
Isn't England just a small island nation too?

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 16, 2016 2:27 pm
Arlelli and Trescia wrote:What would be the best way to defend oneself in those situations? I'm thinking that the majority of my nation's navy will be designed primarily for defending the nation from oncoming hordes of II Denizens, with a small amount which can deploy ~a Brigade simultaneously.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:03 pm
Arlelli and Trescia wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:What I would like to suggest to new ones like you is that you get a tight friend circle and roleplay/storybuild only with those. The majority of II... well I certainly wouldn't trust them to know what storybuilding is.
Limiting yourself to a tight friend circle also allows you a clear image of what your defence needs and how you can acquire what your defence needs.
Yeah, but what if I want to expand with and/or RP outside that circle?

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:09 pm
The Soodean Imperium wrote:I can't find a way to make this relevant to the current discussion so I'll just post the image and the link
([url=http://iiwiki.com/images/thumb/e/e9/IMS_Cheng_Emil_1926.png/800px-IMS_Cheng_Emil_1926.png]Image)[/url]
click for full size
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Cheng-Emil_class_battleship
Big warship is big

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:32 am

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Apr 27, 2016 7:40 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:39 am
North Arkana wrote:The wank is strong with this one. Have at it, fellow denizens of this thread, disassemble this thing.George II Class mega aircraft carrier
Crew 8,400 troops
Aircrew ~ 7,800 troops
Flag staff ~ 400 troops
Marines 3,400 troops
Dimensions and displacement
Length ~ 1020 m
Beam ~ 150 m
Flight deck length ~ 1020 m
Flight deck width ~ 240 m
Displacement 360,000 tonnes
Propulsion and speed
Speed 30 knots
Nuclear reactors 7
Aircraft
Airwing 350 Aircraft
Armament
Missiles 12 x ESSM launchers, 12 x RAM launchers, 12 x SAM launchers, 12 x anti-ship missile launchers, 12 x ASROC launchers,
Other 12 x 25.4 mm CIWS, 12 x 127 mm Cannons, 12 x EM railguns, 12 x 6 barrel ASW rocket launchers(Image)

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu May 05, 2016 6:32 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 06, 2016 10:55 am
United States of PA wrote:Nickel Empire wrote:Would it be possible to have a battleship with sixteen guns in four turrets with the gun size being 406mm?
With the correct design, i could see that being completely possible on a Montana sized platform. Quadruple gun turrets have been a thing for a while now, and Montana already was designed with 4 turrets. Shouldn't come out to too much larger than the Montana design, would need to compensate for the additional weight above the waterline though.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 06, 2016 1:15 pm
Pharthan wrote:"Massive amount of ordnance." So use: Two F-18s with anti-ship missiles, or one destroyer with anti-ship missiles. You heavily undervalue missiles. A carrier can field more than enough to kill a battleship. Hence why we don't use battleships, and why the Zumwalt's guns are still prioritized for land-attack.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 06, 2016 7:46 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed May 11, 2016 6:36 am
Spirit of Hope wrote:Deutschen Demokratischen Republic wrote:-snip-
1) Battleships really don't have a place in naval combat post 1950's. Given that your navy appears to be Modern Tech you really have no need for the battleship, especially since it has no modern armaments, such as missiles for either attacking other ships or for air defense.
2) Your aircraft carrier has no need for 15 cm guns.
3) You aren't going to be able to put Tu-160 aircraft on a carrier, and I don't think you will be able to use Mig-21's from a carrier either.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed May 11, 2016 7:30 am

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed May 11, 2016 2:25 pm
Deutschen Demokratischen Republic wrote:That moment when you wondering when everyone's going to realize you're a crap-tier artist and couldn't come up with any designs for a battleship so you just got lazy and decided to put a picture of the Graf Spee there and call it something else so they'll leave you alone about it.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed May 11, 2016 7:21 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed May 11, 2016 8:14 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed May 11, 2016 8:21 pm
Asesari wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Only if you can keep it within naming schemes like this. :P
On a serious note though, I do understand that you're not really this entity called "Japan" but in a certain way those names are a bit jarring.
I an not from Japan, Sorry my bad
(Trying to learn more Japan Cultures)
Edit: Thanks for list, going to rename It after i post Ghost/Fog Fuso Battleship

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 13, 2016 10:20 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 13, 2016 10:26 pm
Imperial Eagle wrote:Bear in mind the actual ship does not have that many missiles. Around 132 total. Other that, I based the hull and armor off the real Montana Class

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 13, 2016 10:42 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 13, 2016 10:45 pm
North Arkana wrote:*Wonders if people make giant lolbattarushipus to compensate for something*
*stops wondering and goes back to trying to decide which CV gets the honor of being called flagship*
Kassaran wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Seriously... if you wanna be special with a slightly higher degree of success... there's always...
The guns.... my god the dakka is strong with that one... :blink:

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 13, 2016 11:09 pm
Pharthan wrote:The thing that really gets me is that you didn't go nuclear, as is evident by the smokestack. Honestly, going Nuclear would be the one stereotypical thing to do here that would have also been logical.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri May 13, 2016 11:24 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Akelphia, HarYan, Nadagua, New Demgeramath
Advertisement