NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nations Warships, MKII

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:11 pm

Write-up done...

You guys can rip into this now if you want, I'm looking for criticism and ways to improve the design, especially in the area of the sensors.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:51 pm

Kouralia wrote:Write-up done...

You guys can rip into this now if you want, I'm looking for criticism and ways to improve the design, especially in the area of the sensors.

and for a last-ditch attempt they can fire the full magazine of 600 rounds per weapon in approximately 0.4 of a second I would like to know how is this possible?
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
Padnak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6408
Founded: Feb 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Padnak » Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:53 pm

The Soodean Imperium wrote:
Padnak wrote:
All noted, I'll be looking into the BrahMos-

I'm using the Kh-35 in my air force and navy currently, wasn't aware of a ground launched version

K-300P Bastion-P or similar (I think there's a Chinese equivalent and maybe an Iranian) worth considering?

K-300P seems redundant with the BrahMos, since it carries the similar P-800 missile. I would suggest using one or the other, but not both at the same time.


I wasn't planning on using both-

I was wondering if it would be more realistic of an island dictatorship to have something a little older like a K-300P and if it would be effective

BrahMos might be used-
"มีใบมีดคมและจิตใจที่คมชัด!"
Have a sharp blade, and a sharper mind!
Need weapons for dubious purposes? Buy Padarm today!
San-Silvacian: Aug 11, 2011-Mar 20, 2015
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.

Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.

Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.

Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.

The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.

Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:54 pm

Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Write-up done...

You guys can rip into this now if you want, I'm looking for criticism and ways to improve the design, especially in the area of the sensors.

and for a last-ditch attempt they can fire the full magazine of 600 rounds per weapon in approximately 0.4 of a second I would like to know how is this possible?

Image

The weapon consists of ten barrels by fifteen barrels, with rounds stored four-deep, and the rounds can be fired in any programmed permutation of 'currently available to fire rounds'. With a 0.1 second delay between each round firing to allow them to vacate the barrel, the weapon can fire all the rounds in four very rapid volleys.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
Riysa
Senator
 
Posts: 4448
Founded: Jan 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riysa » Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:45 pm

Did I hear coastal defense systems? :p

Well, Padnak, if you're a small third-world dictatorship, you aren't going to have that many resources. I'd recommend you base your coastal defense on the Bal-E. Its an 8-round TEL system using the Kh-35 missile (roughly similar to the US' Harpoon), which is one of the most cost-effective systems in the world. Of course, you won't be sinking AEGIS cruisers at long range, but it does what its supposed to - sink any ship, like amphibious warfare ships, that try to get close. Its also quite mobile, which is nice.

Now, for the elite punch, you guys were talking about BrahMos and Oniks earlier. Don't let the newer date fool you - there really isn't that much functional difference between BrahMos and Oniks - BrahMos is a bit faster and comes in more variants than the AShM-only Oniks, but only the former is somewhat important when talking about coastal defense systems - so by taking Oniks over BrahMos you won't really be missing out. Actually, you might be better off taking the Bastion system over the BrahMos system - both are very expensive. The Bastion deal with Vietnam was about 150 million, and I believe the Syrian deal was more than that, and BrahMos itself is more expensive than Oniks. The cost essentially means that you won't be fielding more than a few of them if you plan on sticking to that, so yeah, Oniks might be the better choice in this case.

Lastly, for flavor and realism, consider using some SSC-1 Sepal and SSC-3 Styx systems. Both are mostly obsolete, but they work good as flavor units, and both have a decently-sized warhead. Support them with Bale-E, and they can still be usable against smaller ships and amphibious warfare ships.
Last edited by Riysa on Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:10 pm

The Soodean Imperium wrote:
Sjovenia wrote:Is it possible to have a modernized battleship?

Meh... depends on what you mean by "modernized."

If you mean that your nation already has a few battleships lying around in more or less usable condition (say, as museum ships) and you want to fit them with cruise missiles for a limited coastal bombardment role, then yes, it's possible. In fact, the United States did this with its Iowas prior to the First Gulf War.

If you mean building an entirely new vessel that is about 250 meters long and armed with a combination of missiles and heavy-calibre guns, that's a different story. Possible, certainly, but not really a good idea.

replace heavy-caliber guns with mortars and you have a reasonable ship
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:17 pm

I'm not sure you can do meaningful coastal bombardment with Tomahawks.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Oaledonia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oaledonia » Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:14 pm

Allanea wrote:I'm not sure you can do meaningful coastal bombardment with Tomahawks.

But.... That was one of the main line of thoughts when designing it.
Last edited by Wikipe-tan on January 13, 2006 4:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military Info
Blackjack-and-Hookers wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:I'll go make my own genocidal galactic empire! with blackjack and hookers

You bet your ass you will!
Divair wrote:NSG summer doesn't end anymore. Climate change.
Under construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:31 pm

What is our definition of coastal bombardment?

Obviously you can hit key military sites and bridges and whatnot with Tomahawks.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:37 pm

If you need more than Tomahawks, aircraft, and a few deck guns to clear the beach, it might be time to start looking for alternative landing sites.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:39 pm

So we have agreed that deck guns are useful?
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:58 pm

Allanea wrote:So we have agreed that deck guns are useful?


At the cost of sounding like *R&C*, useful is a rather variable term. And at least IMO, must be balanced against the penalties involved in dedicated space to such equipment.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 am

The Akasha Colony wrote:If you need more than Tomahawks, aircraft, and a few deck guns to clear the beach, it might be time to start looking for alternative landing sites.


>using deck guns for shore bombardment ever

>amphibious assault ever

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25601
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:57 am

Of course one potential solution is to mount MLRS launchers on your landing ships, like the Zubr has.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:00 am

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Allanea wrote:So we have agreed that deck guns are useful?


At the cost of sounding like *R&C*, useful is a rather variable term. And at least IMO, must be balanced against the penalties involved in dedicated space to such equipment.


What are the space penalties for a "deck gun?"
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:06 am

Triplebaconation wrote:
The Akasha Colony wrote:
At the cost of sounding like *R&C*, useful is a rather variable term. And at least IMO, must be balanced against the penalties involved in dedicated space to such equipment.


What are the space penalties for a "deck gun?"

Depends on the size of the turret.

But really, guys, use 20 cm mortars.

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:29 am

Kouralia wrote:
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:and for a last-ditch attempt they can fire the full magazine of 600 rounds per weapon in approximately 0.4 of a second I would like to know how is this possible?

Image

The weapon consists of ten barrels by fifteen barrels, with rounds stored four-deep, and the rounds can be fired in any programmed permutation of 'currently available to fire rounds'. With a 0.1 second delay between each round firing to allow them to vacate the barrel, the weapon can fire all the rounds in four very rapid volleys.

I see. Quite nice kour.
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
Opplandia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1318
Founded: Jun 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Opplandia » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 am

Id say that "metalstorm" stuff would do for a nice CIWS.
NS-stats are not used

User avatar
Fordorsia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20431
Founded: Oct 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fordorsia » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:30 am

Opplandia wrote:Id say that "metalstorm" stuff would do for a nice CIWS.


I doubt it, unless they have a very high capacity. The whole point of modern systems is to get as many bullitz into the air as possible, and I doubt you could do that with a weapon that that fires quickly with a very limited ammo capacity.
Pro: Swords
Anti: Guns

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.

Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad

Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.

Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.

Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

User avatar
Antarticaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1774
Founded: Sep 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Antarticaria » Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:20 am

Fordorsia wrote:
Opplandia wrote:Id say that "metalstorm" stuff would do for a nice CIWS.


I doubt it, unless they have a very high capacity. The whole point of modern systems is to get as many bullitz into the air as possible, and I doubt you could do that with a weapon that that fires quickly with a very limited ammo capacity.


I concur, a continuous wall of lead is needed not a small fence of lead.
Just a average person! Is that too straight forward?

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:30 am

Fordorsia wrote:
Opplandia wrote:Id say that "metalstorm" stuff would do for a nice CIWS.


I doubt it, unless they have a very high capacity. The whole point of modern systems is to get as many bullitz into the air as possible, and I doubt you could do that with a weapon that that fires quickly with a very limited ammo capacity.

I would agree with you. His system is based as a last resort and as such it is a nice touch. I do not think that it will double well as a CIWS.
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:00 am

Fordorsia wrote:
Opplandia wrote:Id say that "metalstorm" stuff would do for a nice CIWS.


I doubt it, unless they have a very high capacity. The whole point of modern systems is to get as many bullitz into the air as possible, and I doubt you could do that with a weapon that that fires quickly with a very limited ammo capacity.

My system is primarily intended to deal with shore emplacements like a machinegun nest and/or small-craft which are attacking the ship. The two twin 40mm guns are more intended to face off against any proper missile swarms.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:04 am

Gun based CIWS are alright if you're shooting down MM38 Exocets, Harpoons and other older generation AShMs.

Kashtan, SeaRAM etc are much better systems.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:08 am

San-Silvacian wrote:Gun based CIWS are alright if you're shooting down MM38 Exocets, Harpoons and other older generation AShMs.

Kashtan, SeaRAM etc are much better systems.

My main CIWS is not!Kashtan, IIRC. I'm mostly using the DARDO F/F because it's cool for this. The vessel's normally escorted by a pair of Light Cruisers anyway.
Last edited by Kouralia on Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:12 am

big boat

Chacal and Le Gallic class are of fite.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Canarsia, The Land of the Ephyral

Advertisement

Remove ads