Your Nations Warships, MKII

[New Vihenia]

my cruiser carries Exocet ;-;

Only exocet ? If so then it's not Cruiser :3

[San-Silvacian]

my cruiser carries Exocet ;-;

Only exocet ? If so then it's not Cruiser :3

still could wrek ur navy

[New Vihenia]

still could wrek ur navy

well if small exocet can do the wrecking.. I wonder what my navy's Yakhont and Vulkan can do :3.

[San-Silvacian]

still could wrek ur navy

well if small exocet can do the wrecking.. I wonder what my navy's Yakhont and Vulkan can do :3.

Aster series make null ur AShM.

[New Vihenia]

Aster series make null ur AShM.

then same goes for ma Kashtans and 9M96's :3

[Pharthan]

(Image)

carrier process so far, still a wip

going for 20-30 aircraft, both fixed and rotor wing. If I can, 40 would be gr8.

Giant island is giant.

[Gallia-]

still could wrek ur navy

well if small exocet can do the wrecking.. I wonder what my navy's Yakhont and Vulkan can do :3.

Nothing, because the structure and inherent robustness of support system is more important than warhead weight.

Aster series make null ur AShM.

then same goes for ma Kashtans and 9M96's :3

Seawolf obsoletes your gigantic anti-submarine battlecruiser.

[New Vihenia]

Nothing, because the structure and inherent robustness of support system is more important than warhead weight.

How robust typical ship structure when subjected to 900 Kg of warhead ?

Seawolf obsoletes your gigantic anti-submarine battlecruiser.

1st wrong.. I use no gigantic anti submarine battlecruiser.

2nd wrong.. My Sonar isn't soviet sonar.

Cut that mother fucking cold war mentality already.. It's very annoying.

[The Soodean Imperium]

My definition for cruiser..is that they are capable of carrying larger AsHM than Destroyers or Frigate. :3

Tarantul-III class corvettes carry P-270 Moskit. Your argument is invalid

[Felucian Planetary Republic]

The most common warship of the FPR is the Venator Class Attack Cruiser (Star Destroyer).

[Gallia-]

Nothing, because the structure and inherent robustness of support system is more important than warhead weight.

How robust typical ship structure when subjected to 900 Kg of warhead ?

Seawolf obsoletes your gigantic anti-submarine battlecruiser.

1st wrong.. I use no gigantic anti submarine battlecruiser.

2nd wrong.. My Sonar isn't soviet sonar.

Cut that mother fucking cold war mentality already.. It's very annoying.

1) Unimportant, as the supporting structure of datalinks ensures that it will never be hit in the first place. o:

2) You use Soviet anti-submarine weapons (I'm pretty sure?), welcome to losing. Using any advanced Soviet weapon is a sign of a diminished technology industry and inferior integrated circuit production, though, so S-400 will equally predispose your industry to losing.

[Kouralia]

Toot-toot, Kouralian Coast Guard is here for your passports and illegal weapons.

What do you mean it looks like a Damen Stan 5009?
<.<
>.>

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

(Image)

Toot-toot, Kouralian Coast Guard is here for your passports and illegal weapons.

What do you mean it looks like a Damen Stan 5009?
<.<
>.>

Sexy

[Macedonian Grand Empire]

(Image)

Toot-toot, Kouralian Coast Guard is here for your passports and illegal weapons.

What do you mean it looks like a Damen Stan 5009?
<.<
>.>

Hmm your coast guard is called the financial police?

[San-Silvacian]

(Image)

Toot-toot, Kouralian Coast Guard is here for your passports and illegal weapons.

What do you mean it looks like a Damen Stan 5009?
<.<
>.>

needs phalanx to spray drug traffickers.

[Urran]

Police of Finances?

[Kouralia]

(Image)

Toot-toot, Kouralian Coast Guard is here for your passports and illegal weapons.

What do you mean it looks like a Damen Stan 5009?
<.<
>.>

Sexy

Thank'ee.

Hmm your coast guard is called the financial police?

Nope, no precedent for that at all IRL.

Police of Finances?

I'll translate it to Financial Guard (Regiment), for back story, badassery, tradition, and 'I haven't translated 'Financial Guard into Kouralian yet'.

[Kassaran]

What can I change? No, it doesn't submerge, but it does utilize railguns like before, except this time with slower muzzle velocity than most others. Wouldn't it be easier to simply make the projectile travel more slowly and preserve the barrel that way? Also, yes, it has VLS missile capabilities, but they'll be for BVR engagements while the slow-firing RG's are going to be the mid-range engagement artillery and then three 18mm Rotary Point-Defense Cannon systems are mounted on various points of the central bridge structure: Two on either side forward of the main antennae while one sits just behind it. In addition, two manned guns are on either side of the bridge structure as well as four torpedo tubes which release above the water from special tubes just below the decking.

Could a vessel this size use a pressurized water nuclear reactor and note this is a rough draft that is open to change?

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

Sexy

Thank'ee.

Hmm your coast guard is called the financial police?

Nope, no precedent for that at all IRL.

Police of Finances?

I'll translate it to Financial Guard (Regiment), for back story, badassery, tradition, and 'I haven't translated 'Financial Guard into Kouralian yet'.

How good are you at art in general, at this rate I'm willing to sell myself for some help.

[Kouralia]

*snip*

How good are you at art in general, at this rate I'm willing to sell myself for some help.

It depends on what type of help, and what you mean by 'good'.

Also, would it be regular for an LHD under way to have helicopters on its deck even if it were (in theory) to be in a 'no threat of anything at all' area i.e. if Sweden owned all the land bordering on the Baltic sea, would a Swedish LHD going through the Sea be likely to have helicopters on its deck?

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

I need art for ships for my Ecumene nation, good enough really, and there is already a basic design that they have (But its all concept art!)

[Connori Pilgrims]

How good are you at art in general, at this rate I'm willing to sell myself for some help.

It depends on what type of help, and what you mean by 'good'.

Also, would it be regular for an LHD under way to have helicopters on its deck even if it were (in theory) to be in a 'no threat of anything at all' area i.e. if Sweden owned all the land bordering on the Baltic sea, would a Swedish LHD going through the Sea be likely to have helicopters on its deck?

Yes it'd be pretty regular; No carrier can actually carry all of its stated complement of planes inside its below decks hangars, so they often use deck parking.

[The Soodean Imperium]

How robust typical ship structure when subjected to 900 Kg of warhead ?



1st wrong.. I use no gigantic anti submarine battlecruiser.

2nd wrong.. My Sonar isn't soviet sonar.

Cut that mother fucking cold war mentality already.. It's very annoying.

1) Unimportant, as the supporting structure of datalinks ensures that it will never be hit in the first place. o:

2) You use Soviet anti-submarine weapons (I'm pretty sure?), welcome to losing. Using any advanced Soviet weapon is a sign of a diminished technology industry and inferior integrated circuit production, though, so S-400 will equally predispose your industry to losing.

Not to be all :cliche: here, but good RPing isn't necessarily about winning or losing - it's about writing the story that accompanies that conflict. Which means that if a given nation's historical canon involves ties to the Eastern Bloc, having a less-than-developed economy, or using a doctrine that rests on quantity rather than quality, Soviet/Russian weapons are a good choice from a story-oriented point of view, even if (as you claim) they are inferior to what NATO has to offer. And in my experience, working within the flaws of your given equipment makes far better RP material than simply boasting about how superior it is.

I agree that there's far too much "ROSSIYA STRONK USE S400 KILL ALL UR WEAK WESTURN PLANES!!!1" - but as far as writing quality goes, that's no different than "NATO STRONK USE PATRIOT MISSILE KILL ALL UR WEAK COMMIE PLANES!!!1". The problem on today's II isn't people overusing one bloc's equipment or another; it's people using any equipment in general and claiming that it's the best in the world and will allow them to crush everything in their path with minimal losses. Hence the obsession with mega-dreadnoughts, ultra-heavy MBTs, and super-soldier spec-ops.

If you think that NATO-based equipment is a better match for your canon, then by all means use it. If you think someone is overstating what their equipment can do, then by all means politely point it out. But please think twice before waving your genitals in people's faces every time you see anything remotely non-Western appear. It's a little disconcerting to watch.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

1) Unimportant, as the supporting structure of datalinks ensures that it will never be hit in the first place. o:

2) You use Soviet anti-submarine weapons (I'm pretty sure?), welcome to losing. Using any advanced Soviet weapon is a sign of a diminished technology industry and inferior integrated circuit production, though, so S-400 will equally predispose your industry to losing.

Not to be all :cliche: here, but good RPing isn't necessarily about winning or losing - it's about writing the story that accompanies that conflict. Which means that if a given nation's historical canon involves ties to the Eastern Bloc, having a less-than-developed economy, or using a doctrine that rests on quantity rather than quality, Soviet/Russian weapons are a good choice from a story-oriented point of view, even if (as you claim) they are inferior to what NATO has to offer. And in my experience, working within the flaws of your given equipment makes far better RP material than simply boasting about how superior it is.

I agree that there's far too much "ROSSIYA STRONK USE S400 KILL ALL UR WEAK WESTURN PLANES!!!1" - but as far as writing quality goes, that's no different than "NATO STRONK USE PATRIOT MISSILE KILL ALL UR WEAK COMMIE PLANES!!!1". The problem on today's II isn't people overusing one bloc's equipment or another; it's people using any equipment in general and claiming that it's the best in the world and will allow them to crush everything in their path with minimal losses. Hence the obsession with mega-dreadnoughts, ultra-heavy MBTs, and super-soldier spec-ops.

If you think that NATO-based equipment is a better match for your canon, then by all means use it. If you think someone is overstating what their equipment can do, then by all means politely point it out. But please think twice before waving your genitals in people's faces every time you see anything remotely non-Western appear. It's a little disconcerting to watch.

Didn't you know waving his superior genitals in our unworthy faces is Galla/Kattsun's job? I'm still trying to figure out if Kattsun doesn't hate any other thing than the MBT-70.

[Macedonian Grand Empire]

How good are you at art in general, at this rate I'm willing to sell myself for some help.

It depends on what type of help, and what you mean by 'good'.

Also, would it be regular for an LHD under way to have helicopters on its deck even if it were (in theory) to be in a 'no threat of anything at all' area i.e. if Sweden owned all the land bordering on the Baltic sea, would a Swedish LHD going through the Sea be likely to have helicopters on its deck?

Unless there is storm there are always helicopters on deck and planes on carriers. But that is in RL. I would personally still keep some on deck in case of an unforeseen emergency