NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nations Warships, MKII

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:52 am

Alduinium wrote:
Lubyak wrote:
As far as a post-World War I superdreadnought, they were fine, and quite capable. In the IJN style of trying to build the biggest and best of everything, they were well--even exceptionally--armed and armoured for their time. However, they're only going to be good for World War I and the inter-war era. By World War II, they won't be much use anymore.

Yeah, I don't intend on use them after 1950. Would a small group of destroyers (about five) acting as AA for the battleship help improve it's survivablility against aircraft?


This is generally one of the primary roles for a WWII-era destroyer, yes.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Alduinium
Envoy
 
Posts: 297
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Alduinium » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:04 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Alduinium wrote:Yeah, I don't intend on use them after 1950. Would a small group of destroyers (about five) acting as AA for the battleship help improve it's survivablility against aircraft?


This is generally one of the primary roles for a WWII-era destroyer, yes.

All right, anyways, I have an idea for a 'Battleship Battle Group' circa 1920
2x Fuso class battleships
1x Aircraft Carrier
3x (insert heavy cruiser here)
5x (insert light cruiser here)
10x Fletcher class destroyer

How is this?

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:10 pm

Alduinium wrote:
The Akasha Colony wrote:
This is generally one of the primary roles for a WWII-era destroyer, yes.

All right, anyways, I have an idea for a 'Battleship Battle Group' circa 1920
2x Fuso class battleships
1x Aircraft Carrier
3x (insert heavy cruiser here)
5x (insert light cruiser here)
10x Fletcher class destroyer

How is this?


That depends on what it's supposed to do. While doctrine varied at the time, it was later confirmed that concentration of force is ideal, whether it be through battleships or aircraft carriers. Thus, dispersing the battleship fleet into smaller squadrons isn't that useful except against an enemy whose navy is so small it can be dealt with through just one of these squadrons. Otherwise, his concentrated battle fleet will not have a problem engaging and destroying a squadron like this.

This does not apply of course to escort screens, where dispersion is somewhat more valuable for the purpose of detecting the enemy and covering a wider area, but battleships are not generally dispersed into the picket screens.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Alduinium
Envoy
 
Posts: 297
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Alduinium » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:37 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Alduinium wrote:All right, anyways, I have an idea for a 'Battleship Battle Group' circa 1920
2x Fuso class battleships
1x Aircraft Carrier
3x (insert heavy cruiser here)
5x (insert light cruiser here)
10x Fletcher class destroyer

How is this?


That depends on what it's supposed to do. While doctrine varied at the time, it was later confirmed that concentration of force is ideal, whether it be through battleships or aircraft carriers. Thus, dispersing the battleship fleet into smaller squadrons isn't that useful except against an enemy whose navy is so small it can be dealt with through just one of these squadrons. Otherwise, his concentrated battle fleet will not have a problem engaging and destroying a squadron like this.

This does not apply of course to escort screens, where dispersion is somewhat more valuable for the purpose of detecting the enemy and covering a wider area, but battleships are not generally dispersed into the picket screens.


So, something like this would be better?

5x Fuso class battleships
2x Aircraft Carriers
5x Heavy Cruisers
10x Light Cruisers
15x Destroyers

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:45 pm

Alduinium wrote:So, something like this would be better?

5x Fuso class battleships
2x Aircraft Carriers
5x Heavy Cruisers
10x Light Cruisers
15x Destroyers


Generally, battleships, carriers, cruisers, and destroyers would all be organized into different squadrons, usually of around a half-dozen ships. Ideally of the same class as well, for tactical homogeneity. Thus, these squadrons could be detached and maneuvered as needed, particularly since once the battle was joined, the battleships would form up into their own formation to engage the enemy battleships, and the escorts would move to the periphery. Fleets would in turn be composed of whatever squadrons were around to be assigned, so it's better to organize a squadron, then make fleets out of these squadrons since that is how they were actually created and organized.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:46 pm

Generally you have destroyer battle groups, carrier battlegroups, and battleship battlegroups.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Alduinium
Envoy
 
Posts: 297
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Alduinium » Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:10 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Alduinium wrote:So, something like this would be better?

5x Fuso class battleships
2x Aircraft Carriers
5x Heavy Cruisers
10x Light Cruisers
15x Destroyers


Generally, battleships, carriers, cruisers, and destroyers would all be organized into different squadrons, usually of around a half-dozen ships. Ideally of the same class as well, for tactical homogeneity. Thus, these squadrons could be detached and maneuvered as needed, particularly since once the battle was joined, the battleships would form up into their own formation to engage the enemy battleships, and the escorts would move to the periphery. Fleets would in turn be composed of whatever squadrons were around to be assigned, so it's better to organize a squadron, then make fleets out of these squadrons since that is how they were actually created and organized.

Alright then.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:10 pm

Carriers in 1920? You can do that I know by 1920, but a practical force of legit carriers, not sea plane tenders?
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:12 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:Carriers in 1920? You can do that I know by 1920, but a practical force of legit carriers, not sea plane tenders?


HMS Argus had been converted in 1918, and the US converted Langley in 1920. They weren't all that useful for attacking as they would be in WWII given the then-present state of aircraft development, but they were certainly not seaplane tenders.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Alduinium
Envoy
 
Posts: 297
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Alduinium » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:28 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:Carriers in 1920? You can do that I know by 1920, but a practical force of legit carriers, not sea plane tenders?

Alduinium uses small carriers (or more specifically, the planes they carry) for reconissance in 1920.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:35 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
San-Silvacian wrote:Carriers in 1920? You can do that I know by 1920, but a practical force of legit carriers, not sea plane tenders?


HMS Argus had been converted in 1918, and the US converted Langley in 1920. They weren't all that useful for attacking as they would be in WWII given the then-present state of aircraft development, but they were certainly not seaplane tenders.


Its the limited scope of usefulness leading upto WWII which Linda seems werid.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Pharthan
Minister
 
Posts: 2969
Founded: Feb 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pharthan » Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:36 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:Carriers in 1920? You can do that I know by 1920, but a practical force of legit carriers, not sea plane tenders?

If you had a group of Admirals who liked the idea and weren't so fixated on BBs like everyone was in IRL at the time, it'd be easy - especially if you had ships you were willing to convert. You just need the support from the upper chain.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

"Humanity is a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
"Besides, if God didn't want us making glowing fish and insect-resistant corn, the building blocks of life wouldn't be so easy for science to fiddle with." - Dracoria

Why haven't I had anything new in my storefront for so long? This is why. I've been busy.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:40 pm

I don't think tailhooks would be sufficiently advanced in the twenties, but fortunately STOL aircraft are quite possible.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Pharthan
Minister
 
Posts: 2969
Founded: Feb 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pharthan » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:39 am

I'm planning on doing a Fast-Battleship based off of my Phalanx-class Battlecruiser. First order of business is to elongate it and drop the trimaran outriggers. I'm going to do two models - an Arsenal ship model an a standard old-school 16" gun model.
So far I've:
Enlongated it.
Dropped the main deck down 20 feet to bring the entire structure closer to the water.
Deepened the "neck" in the bow to be more flattened out.

I'm now trying to figure out how to do the sides. Dropping the trimaran outriggers reduces how much firepower I can throw on the thing, but it'd be essential for speed.
how should I do the sides? Should they be flush with the main superstructure, or, like a typical battleship, have weatherdeck on the sides of the superstructure?
Flight-deck and hangar up higher or down lower? I'm presently thinking higher, above the main gun, so the main rear gun for the gun-variant will have that centered lower down.

Yes, I'm aware I should just go for cruisers and smaller ships, which is part of the reason I'm going for speed on this sucker.
Last edited by Pharthan on Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:07 am, edited 3 times in total.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

"Humanity is a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
"Besides, if God didn't want us making glowing fish and insect-resistant corn, the building blocks of life wouldn't be so easy for science to fiddle with." - Dracoria

Why haven't I had anything new in my storefront for so long? This is why. I've been busy.

User avatar
The State of Czecho-Slovakia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:56 am

Rich and Corporations wrote:I don't think tailhooks would be sufficiently advanced in the twenties, but fortunately STOL aircraft are quite possible.


You could use Autogyros, which first flew in 1923. If of course your main concern was sub hunting, otherwise they're rubbish.
Player Since 2012

User avatar
New Korongo
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6019
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Korongo » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:36 pm

Image
Lidi 400 Class

Type: Fast Attack Craft/Missile Boat
In Service: 1981 - 1995 (UPNF), 1994 - Present (PGNK)
Displacement: 398 t (392 Long Tons, 439 Short Tons)
Length: 57.6 m (189.9 ft)
Beam: 8.8 m (28.9 ft)
Draught: 3.0 m (9.8 ft)
Propulsion: 4 x Wolfhaven DPS33 Diesel Engines (3300 kW or 4425 hp Each)
Speed: 70 km/h (38 kn, 43 mph)
Range: 780 km (484 miles, 421 Nautical Miles)
Complement: 5 Officers, 27 Enlisted
Sensors & Processing Systems:
    Wolfhaven Ensign IFF
    Western Electronics SS400 Surface Search Radar
    Western Electronics FC400 Fire Control Radar
Armament:
    8 x MM40 Exocet Block 3 Anti-Ship Missile
    1 x National Artillery NG5 76 mm Gun
    1 x Rondache I Close-In Weapons System
    1 x FN BRG-15 Heavy Machine Gun
Last edited by New Korongo on Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:08 pm

Is it true that the reason why Russia's carriers are hybrid warships/carriers is because carriers are banned from passing through the Bosporus?
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
New Korongo
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6019
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Korongo » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:41 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:Is it true that the reason why Russia's carriers are hybrid warships/carriers is because carriers are banned from passing through the Bosporus?

There are probably additional reasons to do with doctrine, but if I remember correctly the Montreux Convention prohibits nations bordering the Black Sea from sending aircraft carriers with a tonnage greater than 15,000 tons through the Bosphorus Strait. Under the same agreement, capital ships transiting through the Strait had no tonnage restriction. I believe the Montreux Convention defined an aircraft carrier as a vessel primarily intended to operate aircraft. In theory, if the Soviet Union built carriers that did not appear to be primarily intended to operate aircraft, they could ignore the tonnage restriction and class the vessel as a capital ship.

User avatar
Pharthan
Minister
 
Posts: 2969
Founded: Feb 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pharthan » Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:30 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:Is it true that the reason why Russia's carriers are hybrid warships/carriers is because carriers are banned from passing through the Bosporus?

It's also generally considered a bad idea to send a carrier, a full-blown carrier, through such a small strait like that.
Also, I'd be hesitant to send one through for the depth concerns. With only 10 feet of clearance, you'd rapidly find your condensers clogging with sediment.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

"Humanity is a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
"Besides, if God didn't want us making glowing fish and insect-resistant corn, the building blocks of life wouldn't be so easy for science to fiddle with." - Dracoria

Why haven't I had anything new in my storefront for so long? This is why. I've been busy.

User avatar
Lubyak
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9339
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Lubyak » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:12 am

Rich and Corporations wrote:Is it true that the reason why Russia's carriers are hybrid warships/carriers is because carriers are banned from passing through the Bosporus?


The primary reason is that aircraft carriers have a very different role in Russian doctrine than in Western one. They're meant to defend the naval bastions, not sail out to project power on their own. They legitimately are aircraft carrying warships rather than dedicated carriers.

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:09 am

Woahhh
Only just realized this thread exists. :P
Would appreciate if some of you could give this a look over, too.
Adaline Rourke-class Destroyer

Place of Origin: Image Federated States of Anacaspia
Builders:
  • Universal Dynamics Marine Engineering
  • Priscus Shipbuilding Plant
  • Wash Steel Works
  • Federated Drydock
Operators: Image Federated States Naval Component
Preceded By: Arleigh Burke-class Destroyer
Unit Cost: $1,800,000,000 NSD
Designed: 1998-2006
Built: 2006-Present
In Service: 2007-Present
Planned: 416
Completed: 173
Active: 171

Type: Nuclear Guided Missile Destroyer
Displacement:
  • Standard: 9,250 Tons
  • Fully Loaded: 11,500 Tons
Length: 167.5 Meters
Beam: 21 Meters
Draft: 8.25 Meters
Block Coefficient: 0.311
Installed Power: 2x Diesel Generator (5,000 kW each)
Propulsion: Nuclear Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (204,600 kW thermal output)
  • 4x Steam Turbine (22,506 kW each)
  • 2x Shaft
  • 2x Five-bladed Propeller w/ Pump Jet
  • 2x Rudder
Speed:
  • Flank Speed: 34 Knots
  • Cruising Speed: 26 Knots
Range: Unlimited (Theoretical)
Endurance: Unlimited (Theoretical; stores last up to 90 days)
Boats and Landing Craft:
  • 2x Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat
  • 15x Encapsulated Lifeboat
Complement: 28 Officers, 308 Enlisted

Sensors and Processing Systems:
  • Dual Band Radar System
    • AN/SPY-3 X Band AESA Radar
    • AN/SPY-4 S Band AESA Radar
  • AN/SQS-60 Bow Array Sonar
  • AN/SQR-20 Multifunction Towed Array Sonar
  • Sagem Vampir NG IRST System
  • AN/SQQ-28 LAMPS III Shipboard System
Electronic Warfare and Decoys:
  • LIG Nex1 SLQ-200K Sonata Electronic Warfare System
  • AN/SLQ-25C Nixie Torpedo Decoy System
  • 6x Mk 36 SRBOC Anti-ship Missile Decoy Launcher


Armament:
  • Otobreda 127mm L/64 Dual Barrel Gun (Fore)
  • 2x Shepherd Gun & Missile CIWS (1 Fore, 1 Aft)
  • 2x Mk 51 30mm Chain Gun (1 Port, 1 Starboard)
  • 4x BRG-15 15.5mm Machine Gun (2 Port, 2 Starboard)
  • 4x Mk 141 Quadruple Missile Launcher (Midships)
  • 16x Mk 41 8-Cell VLS (6 Fore, 10 Aft)
  • 2x Mk 32 SVTT Triple Torpedo Tubes (1 Port, 1 Starboard)
Aircraft Carried: 2x SH-60 Seahawk-series Helicopters
Aviation Facilities: Flight Deck and Enclosed Hangars
Last edited by Anacasppia on Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:12 am

Anacasppia wrote:Woahhh
Only just realized this thread exists. :P
Would appreciate if some of you could give this a look over, too.
Adaline Rourke-class Destroyer

Place of Origin: (Image) Federated States of Anacaspia
Builders:
  • Universal Dynamics Marine Engineering
  • Priscus Shipbuilding Plant
  • Wash Steel Works
  • Federated Drydock
Operators: (Image) Federated States Naval Component
Preceded By: Arleigh Burke-class Destroyer
Unit Cost: $1,800,000,000 NSD
Designed: 1998-2006
Built: 2006-Present
In Service: 2007-Present
Planned: 416
Completed: 173
Active: 171

Type: Nuclear Guided Missile Destroyer
Displacement:
  • Standard: 9,250 Tons
  • Fully Loaded: 11,500 Tons
Length: 167.5 Meters
Beam: 21 Meters
Draft: 8.25 Meters
Block Coefficient: 0.311
Installed Power: 2x Diesel Generator (5,000 kW each)
Propulsion: Nuclear Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (204,600 kW thermal output)
  • 4x Steam Turbine (22,506 kW each)
  • 2x Shaft
  • 2x Five-bladed Propeller w/ Pump Jet
  • 2x Rudder
Speed:
  • Flank Speed: 34 Knots
  • Cruising Speed: 26 Knots
Range: Unlimited (Theoretical)
Endurance: Unlimited (Theoretical; stores last up to 90 days)
Boats and Landing Craft:
  • 2x Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat
  • 15x Encapsulated Lifeboat
Complement: 28 Officers, 308 Enlisted

Sensors and Processing Systems:
  • Dual Band Radar System
    • AN/SPY-3 X Band AESA Radar
    • AN/SPY-4 S Band AESA Radar
  • AN/SQS-60 Bow Array Sonar
  • AN/SQR-20 Multifunction Towed Array Sonar
  • Sagem Vampir NG IRST System
  • AN/SQQ-28 LAMPS III Shipboard System
Electronic Warfare and Decoys:
  • LIG Nex1 SLQ-200K Sonata Electronic Warfare System
  • AN/SLQ-25C Nixie Torpedo Decoy System
  • 6x Mk 36 SRBOC Anti-ship Missile Decoy Launcher


Armament:
  • Otobreda 127mm L/64 Dual Barrel Gun (Fore)
  • 2x Shepherd Gun & Missile CIWS (1 Fore, 1 Aft)
  • 2x Mk 51 30mm Chain Gun (1 Port, 1 Starboard)
  • 4x BRG-15 15.5mm Machine Gun (2 Port, 2 Starboard)
  • 4x Mk 141 Quadruple Missile Launcher (Midships)
  • 16x Mk 41 8-Cell VLS (6 Fore, 10 Aft)
  • 2x Mk 32 SVTT Triple Torpedo Tubes (1 Port, 1 Starboard)
Aircraft Carried: 2x SH-60 Seahawk-series Helicopters
Aviation Facilities: Flight Deck and Enclosed Hangars

Needs moar laser railgun turrets ciws things or else its not ns worthy
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:52 am

I presume that is San-speak for 'hay dis is prity sansiber'. :lol:
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:17 pm

After some thought about an argument with Lyras on how to best project power in the NS-world, I have up with the Floating Fortress Megacapital Battleship (Copyleft by Rich and Corporations).

The floating fortress is constructed over a period of five years in a dammed bay that is drained dry. Using Incan masonry techniques and modern CAD technology, concrete blocks are fitted together like a jigsaw puzzle using a crane. These concrete blocks weigh 50 kg each and are reinforced with epoxy-coated steel. The concrete hull is over two meters thick, enough to survive even the biggest bomb blasts. The hull itself is covered with consumer-grade aluminum and foam to seal against moisture and oxidation, and is additionally painted with non-toxic anti-fouling paints (since using copper anti-fouling paints will damage entire ecosystems given the enormity of the ship). The deck of the ship is plated with 100mm of armor steel and also covered with several hundred millimeters of reinforced plastic and HCR2. The ship is additionally protected by faraday cages.

Given that the ship is the size of a small city, it can service small ships of fifty thousands tonnes or less in it's very own dry dock. For hull maintenance, it is equipped with several small hundred tonne submarines. It is equipped with a seawater to fuel conversion plant, with a capacity of five million liters of jet fuel (~2x the volume of an Olympic swimming pool) per day. It has enough empty space (roughly twenty million cubic meters) to be equipped with additional machinery, such as factories or refineries.

The ship can also assault a land location by beaching itself, although it is advised that you beach the ship during the lowest tide of the year if you wish to use it again. It has several concrete doors that can be opened through linear charges, allowing troops to charge forward directly from the bowels of the ship. The doors have depleted uranium weights on the top to allow the doors to fully open, assuming the ship is beached against soft sand. Even if there is some clearance between the doors and the ground, a 20 meter long titanium ramp can be unfolded with a weight capacity of 300 tonnes.


Displacement: 9 billion tonnes
Powerplant: 24x 5 Gigawatt Supercritical Water Reactor
Engine: 75 azipod propulsion units, 50 conventional shaft propellers, no rudders, electric drive
Speed: 33 knots

Crew Complement: 2,500,000
Troop Carrying Capacity: 50,000,000
Hospital Capacity: 10,000,000

Length: 50 kilometers
Beam: 6 kilometers
Draught: ~100 meters

Weapons
    500,000 Vertical Launch Cells
    1,000 CIWS defence batteries
    20,000 anti-torpedo depth charge dispensers
Electronics
    5 Petaflops anti-encryption supercomputer to hack enemy encryptions
    1 Petaflops general purpose supercomputer, distributed throughout the ship
    Numerous short-range, medium-range, and long-range radars
    Also has JORN

    Sonar: 1 keel mounted, 1 bow mounted, 1 port mounted, 1 stern mounted, 1 towed

    Radar/signals emissions processor and retransmitter

Communications
All of them
Aircraft
Over a thousand. No need for catapult assisted takeoff.

Cost: $20 trillion NSD
Last edited by Rich and Corporations on Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Lyras
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1145
Founded: Jul 26, 2004
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Lyras » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:23 pm

O.o
Mokastana: Then Lyras happened.

Allanea: Wanting to avoid fighting Lyras' fuck-huge military is also a reasonable IC consideration

TPF: Who is stupid enough to attack a Lyran convoy?

Sumer: Honestly, I'd rather face Doom's military with Doom having a 3-1 advantage over me, than take a 1-1 fight with a well-supplied Lyran tank unit.

Kinsgard: RL Lyras is like a real life video game character.

Ieperithem: Eighty four. Eighty four percent of their terrifyingly massive GDP goes directly into their military. And they actually know how to manage it. It's safe to say there isn't a single nation that could feasibly stand against them if they wanted it to die.
Yikes. Just... Yikes.

Lyran Arms - Lambda Financial - Foreign Holdings - Tracker - Photo - OOC sentiments

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Qahrania, Reinkalistan, Sagrea, The socialist creeper

Advertisement

Remove ads