Depends on action.
Arisaka action was up, pull back, push forward, down. Mauser action had a curve i think.
Advertisement
by San-Silvacian » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:58 pm
by Kouralia » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:59 pm
Benomia wrote:In case you haven't noticed, I'm not serious about the lever action.
by Spreewerke » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:13 pm
by Samozaryadnyastan » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:48 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Spreewerke » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:56 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:The Cobra (EM-1, as opposed to the EM-2 Mamba) had a sort of 'bracket' into which the gas tube and barrel both fitted in, which were then slotted inside the receiver. Judging from the image I have here, the EM-2 also had a similar arrangement.
Would this generate any sort of instability/harmonics/play issues with regards to accuracy, as opposed to the traditional method of screwing the barrel directly into the receiver?
el cobra
by Nua Corda » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:00 pm
by Purpelia » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:01 pm
by Spreewerke » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:01 pm
Nua Corda wrote:Just popping in to mention this:
Among my grandfather's personal effects I uncovered a "US Navy Landing Force and Small Arms Manual, 1905" which belonged to his father, who served in WWI. It contains tons of interesting/useful information, including diagrams of the M1903 Springfield, instructions for aiming field artillery, close order drill, sword and bayonet drills for US Naval Infantrymen during the first world war era. If anyone has any questions, I'll have a look through it. Also, expect me to post interesting excerpts as I uncover them.
As a sidenote, I came this close to also inheriting a GI M1911 and a S&W Model 10 Hand-Ejector (M&P .38) which also belonged to my great grandfather and grandfather, but both weapons were stolen from my grandfather's house in 1984.
by Aqizithiuda » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:02 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:The Cobra (EM-1, as opposed to the EM-2 Mamba) had a sort of 'bracket' into which the gas tube and barrel both fitted in, which were then slotted inside the receiver. Judging from the image I have here, the EM-2 also had a similar arrangement.
Would this generate any sort of instability/harmonics/play issues with regards to accuracy, as opposed to the traditional method of screwing the barrel directly into the receiver?
el cobra
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Arkiasis » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:11 pm
by Samozaryadnyastan » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:13 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:The Cobra (EM-1, as opposed to the EM-2 Mamba) had a sort of 'bracket' into which the gas tube and barrel both fitted in, which were then slotted inside the receiver. Judging from the image I have here, the EM-2 also had a similar arrangement.
Would this generate any sort of instability/harmonics/play issues with regards to accuracy, as opposed to the traditional method of screwing the barrel directly into the receiver?
el cobra
I don't know enough to answer your question, but where did you get that awesome pic of the EM2?
Spreewerke wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:The Cobra (EM-1, as opposed to the EM-2 Mamba) had a sort of 'bracket' into which the gas tube and barrel both fitted in, which were then slotted inside the receiver. Judging from the image I have here, the EM-2 also had a similar arrangement.
Would this generate any sort of instability/harmonics/play issues with regards to accuracy, as opposed to the traditional method of screwing the barrel directly into the receiver?
el cobra
I have always heard that a screwed-in barrel is more accurate than pinned. At the same time, I have fired a Russian SKS and a Chinese SKS and didn't really notice that much of a difference at all (none, really). Being pinned in would just make it more difficult to replace, I imagine, and not much else, really.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Nua Corda » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:16 pm
Arkiasis wrote:
Cartridges
5.56x45mm NATO
7.62x51mm NATO
FN 5.7x28mm
9x19mm Parabellum
.50 BMG (12.7x99mm NATO)
12 Guage
by Imperial isa » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:18 pm
by Aqizithiuda » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:19 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Aqizithiuda wrote:
I don't know enough to answer your question, but where did you get that awesome pic of the EM2?
I don't remember which article, but it was on forgottenweapons, comparing the EM-1, 2 and FAL. It had a zip folder of EM-1, EM-2 (the pic is actually the EM-1) and a couple of FAL models at various angles plus field strip.
The folder.
http://www.forgottenweapons.com/photos- ... rototypes/
^there
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Yes Im Biop » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:21 pm
Arkiasis wrote:
Cartridges
5.56x45mm NATO
7.62x51mm NATO
FN 5.7x28mm
9x19mm Parabellum
.50 BMG (12.7x99mm NATO)
12 Guage
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Samozaryadnyastan » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:25 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Benomia » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:27 pm
Arkiasis wrote:
Cartridges
5.56x45mm NATO
7.62x51mm NATO
FN 5.7x28mm
9x19mm Parabellum
.50 BMG (12.7x99mm NATO)
12 Guage
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:You've obviously never seen the Benomian M16A3s.
Carathon wrote:*Logs in with the name of Troll Alliance and writes a short app with poor grammar and logic.*Somehow genuinely surprised when denied*
Ragnarum wrote:Ragnarum transforms into a giant godzilla like creature, then walks into the sunset while emotional music plays and Morgan Freeman narrates.
Kouralia wrote:Everyone hates us: we're MMW. We're like the poster children of Realismfggtry.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
by -the Ukrainian SSR- » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:29 pm
by Aqizithiuda » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:30 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Using Falls' NSD custom search, this was the only result I got:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39962190/Mode ... s-Volume-2
Search for 'em-2', it brings up a load of history on it, the L64/65 and the leadup to the SA80 programme. I guarantee it's not what you're looking for, but it does have a comparison table between different cartridges at ranges.
Empirical, not experimental, unfortunately.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Samozaryadnyastan » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:31 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Aqizithiuda » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:34 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:http://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=014753297990020738850:obqevkk2wqi
Pride of place on my bookmarks bar
Spree, could be an idea to put this in the OP.
It's basically a custom google search that puts high return weightings on military and engineering-oriented web pages, making it easier to dredge the more obscure things an NS-related google search might entail.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Samozaryadnyastan » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:23 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Spreewerke » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Anyone got any more opinions on pinned versus screwed barrels? The SKS boards are pretty divided 50/50 into people who are adamant that pinned barrels are not only terrible but also dangerous, and those who say there is no discernible difference or even a slight improvement with a pinned barrel.
As for my use of it, it sort of just feels less advanced than a screwed barrel. It just feels technologically backward.
Though since my military in theory wants to field upwards of a million of these, plus export, it could be an intentional IC thing to speed up manufacturing to make this possible?
From this, it appears the Cobra pinned its barrel bracket in place with those two prongs on the pistol grip and trigger housing. That sounds even less secure than a physical pin (or series thereof) through the side of the weapon.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement