Main Military Weapon of Your Country: Mk. VI

[Hydronium]

(Image)

F-117 NightHawk. Cool plane, Horrible range.

Who said i haven't modified it...

[Anacasppia]

Yeah, I go for two in an 8 man section.

Charlie Fire Team:
Section IC - R1A2 Assault Rifle
Grenadier - R1A2 Assault Rifle w/ UGL
Rifleman - R1A2 Assault Rifle
Support Gunner - MG-2 LMG
Delta Fire Team:
Section 2IC - R1A2 Assault Rifle
Grenadier - R1A2 Assault Rifle w/ UGL
Rifleman - R1A2 Assault Rifle
Support Gunner - MG-2 LMG

The MG can put down a greater weight of fire in a shorter amount of time, and can proceed to hold that fire rate for longer.

Was thinking of going Frenchy actually; one SAW, and one FLY-K mortar (I've forgotten whatever the French call it). By the way, anybody knows if counter-defilade engagement effects are possible with muzzle launched rifle grenades and a picatinny rail mounted computerized sight?

Bumpity bump.

[Puzikas]

Was thinking of going Frenchy actually; one SAW, and one FLY-K mortar (I've forgotten whatever the French call it). By the way, anybody knows if counter-defilade engagement effects are possible with muzzle launched rifle grenades and a picatinny rail mounted computerized sight?

Bumpity bump.

The French Rifle grenade?
Oh lord that thing is both hilarious and terrifyingly amazing.

I dont have any familiarity with the French rifle grenade, but what I do know about them is that the ACS58 is actually a really cool concept with good execution. They make them in multiple warheads (HEAT, HE, Fragmentation, Thermometric, Dummy, Smoke(?) Ect..) and arent to heavy, but I dont know how many they carry. Its very cool.

As for your question, Yes. It certainly would be. Especially due to indirect and direct fire capabilities.

[Immoren]

Well I considered I considered again changing my squad structure and going for same squad regardless of whether they are infantry, jaeger or armoured jaeger troops.
Support team
Squad leader (AR)
MG gunner (PKM)
MG assistant (AR)
Designated marksman (dragunov)
Assault team
Squad 2iC (AR)
AT-guy (AR, M72)
AT-guy (AR, M72)
SAW gunner (KVKK 62)

[Immoren]

Fly-K ololol

[Samozaryadnyastan]

F-117 NightHawk. Cool plane, Horrible range.

Who said i haven't modified it...

Doesn't work that way bro. Especially with aircraft, especially still with stealth aircraft.

Archery Novice Championships today.
Shot a 397 Portsmouth, messing up my final end.
It's a personal best, but massive sadface

[Aqizithiuda]

Was thinking of going Frenchy actually; one SAW, and one FLY-K mortar (I've forgotten whatever the French call it). By the way, anybody knows if counter-defilade engagement effects are possible with muzzle launched rifle grenades and a picatinny rail mounted computerized sight?

Bumpity bump.

Yes, you could. You could even make the grenade airburst, if you want.

[The Zeonic States]

"My source Wikipedia"
lul

.-. Mhm; Generally has everything cited and sourced so you can directly find where they got the information they themselves use for their articles.

Making them one of the easiest to use methods of debunk folks even if you don't use the site it self you can use its sources.

Wikipedia is useful on two levels as an actual source and a place to find sources.

[Aqizithiuda]

"My source Wikipedia"
lul

.-. Mhm; Generally has everything cited and sourced so you can directly find where they got the information they themselves use for their articles.

Making them one of the easiest to use methods of debunk folks even if you don't use the site it self you can use its sources.

Wikipedia is useful on two levels as an actual source and a place to find sources.

I only use it to get a basic understanding and to find sources. Using it in arguments tends not to work out so well for me.

[The Zeonic States]

.-. Mhm; Generally has everything cited and sourced so you can directly find where they got the information they themselves use for their articles.

Making them one of the easiest to use methods of debunk folks even if you don't use the site it self you can use its sources.

Wikipedia is useful on two levels as an actual source and a place to find sources.

I only use it to get a basic understanding and to find sources. Using it in arguments tends not to work out so well for me.

Some of its articles can be debated or debunked some are also solid enough with enough general information give that its hard to debunk them you need to pick your battles where Wiki is concerned i learned that.

[Sopwith]

Point taken. Thanks. The Enfield suits both I guess. Or just a complete reverse as suggested.

I also have just remembered the fact that Enfields could pierce and elephant skull. Makes more sense to give it to Regulars.

[Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen]

Remember how I asked a while back about BRs? Well, I decided I was going to attempt to somehow mash the brazilian mystery gun together with the TRW Low Maintenance Rifle, but built for a cartridge more or less equivalent to .338 LM.

Since this is supposed to be a cheap conscriptgun, I'm tempted to go with a long and exceedingly nasty folding cruciform bayonet, since swords are expensive and stuff.

[Spirit of Hope]

Remember how I asked a while back about BRs? Well, I decided I was going to attempt to somehow mash the brazilian mystery gun together with the TRW Low Maintenance Rifle, but built for a cartridge more or less equivalent to .338 LM.

Since this is supposed to be a cheap conscriptgun, I'm tempted to go with a long and exceedingly nasty folding cruciform bayonet, since swords are expensive and stuff.

Certainly looks like an interesting idea. Why a BR for a conscriptgun? Wouldn't that require more training to use well?

[Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen]

I'm not sure why it would.

Also, the planet Senestrum has 40% thicker air at sea level and a quarter again as much gravity as earth, so you need a big high-BC bullet going really fast if you don't want your trajectory to approximate a rainbow.

[Spirit of Hope]

I'm not sure why it would.

Also, the planet Senestrum has 40% thicker air at sea level and a quarter again as much gravity as earth, so you need a big high-BC bullet going really fast if you don't want your trajectory to approximate a rainbow.

Ok, makes sense. More along the lines of recoil control, and some other personal stuff.

[Puzikas]

Remember how I asked a while back about BRs? Well, I decided I was going to attempt to somehow mash the brazilian mystery gun together with the TRW Low Maintenance Rifle, but built for a cartridge more or less equivalent to .338 LM.

Since this is supposed to be a cheap conscriptgun, I'm tempted to go with a long and exceedingly nasty folding cruciform bayonet, since swords are expensive and stuff.

Holy shit I recognise that gun! Sort of!

We saw weapons like that in chechnya, and by "like that" I mean they looked like more banged up versions. Thats crazy.

[Samozaryadnyastan]

Remember how I asked a while back about BRs? Well, I decided I was going to attempt to somehow mash the brazilian mystery gun together with the TRW Low Maintenance Rifle, but built for a cartridge more or less equivalent to .338 LM.

Since this is supposed to be a cheap conscriptgun, I'm tempted to go with a long and exceedingly nasty folding cruciform bayonet, since swords are expensive and stuff.

I think I see FAL in the gas block, AR70/90 or Galil in the handguard, some sort of Sig in the receiver.

[Indeos]

I'm not sure why it would.

Also, the planet Senestrum has 40% thicker air at sea level and a quarter again as much gravity as earth, so you need a big high-BC bullet going really fast if you don't want your trajectory to approximate a rainbow.

Ok, makes sense. More along the lines of recoil control, and some other personal stuff.

I imagine the BR would make your conscripts get better at fighting faster than an AR, since they have to correct for that stuff more. And aim better.

[Spirit of Hope]

Ok, makes sense. More along the lines of recoil control, and some other personal stuff.

I imagine the BR would make your conscripts get better at fighting faster than an AR, since they have to correct for that stuff more. And aim better.

Maybe, but then again I prefer intermediary rounds (.270!) and non conscripts. Also Indeos you haven't been posting as much as you used to, anything up?

[San-Silvacian]

Ok, makes sense. More along the lines of recoil control, and some other personal stuff.

I imagine the BR would make your conscripts get better at fighting faster than an AR, since they have to correct for that stuff more. And aim better.

Don't BRs however require more training to be used?

If you take Joe Schmoe the PA rep for his parent's company who has never fired a gun (Nor even played a video game) and hand him an M14 to defend his motherland, he'll shoulder it, pull the trigger, and dislocate his arm.

If you gave J.S. an assault rifle, sure he'll be like 'wtf' the first few times but will get the hang of it sooner or later, faster however than one with a BR.

[The Republic of Lanos]

I imagine the BR would make your conscripts get better at fighting faster than an AR, since they have to correct for that stuff more. And aim better.

Don't BRs however require more training to be used?

If you take Joe Schmoe the PA rep for his parent's company who has never fired a gun (Nor even played a video game) and hand him an M14 to defend his motherland, he'll shoulder it, pull the trigger, and dislocate his arm.

If you gave J.S. an assault rifle, sure he'll be like 'wtf' the first few times but will get the hang of it sooner or later, faster however than one with a BR.

How would an army train its soldiers to use a BR in the first place? Give them one to hold for a while, shoot some blanks, and fire live rounds?

[San-Silvacian]

Don't BRs however require more training to be used?

If you take Joe Schmoe the PA rep for his parent's company who has never fired a gun (Nor even played a video game) and hand him an M14 to defend his motherland, he'll shoulder it, pull the trigger, and dislocate his arm.

If you gave J.S. an assault rifle, sure he'll be like 'wtf' the first few times but will get the hang of it sooner or later, faster however than one with a BR.

How would an army train its soldiers to use a BR in the first place? Give them one to hold for a while, shoot some blanks, and fire live rounds?

blanks =/= live rounds

and a few days or maybe a week or two won't make a civilian automatically a BR using killing machine.

[The Republic of Lanos]

How would an army train its soldiers to use a BR in the first place? Give them one to hold for a while, shoot some blanks, and fire live rounds?

blanks =/= live rounds

and a few days or maybe a week or two won't make a civilian automatically a BR using killing machine.

It takes a while, yes. Just how long?

[The Zeonic States]

How would an army train its soldiers to use a BR in the first place? Give them one to hold for a while, shoot some blanks, and fire live rounds?

blanks =/= live rounds

and a few days or maybe a week or two won't make a civilian automatically a BR using killing machine.

Heck i never even fired a battle rifle in the Army outside of training; We were shouldering AR's although i will point out having shot a BR myself several times i wasn't uncomfortable with the rifle style.

blanks =/= live rounds

and a few days or maybe a week or two won't make a civilian automatically a BR using killing machine.

It takes a while, yes. Just how long?

Months? Years? Mastering a weapon is not a short term process

[San-Silvacian]

blanks =/= live rounds

and a few days or maybe a week or two won't make a civilian automatically a BR using killing machine.

It takes a while, yes. Just how long?

The United States Army's Basic Combat Training is 9 weeks iirc.

You'd want something around 1-3 weeks.

I think US Army training during WW2 was like a month of nothing but combat training. Their MOS gave them any other job-related skills.