Futuristic, but not so much that it doesn't look feasible. Nice work.
Advertisement

by Uawc » Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:31 pm

by Laos Refugees » Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:34 pm
Barnor wrote:
Each of our soldiers is required to carry a sword like the one above

by Brostan » Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:38 pm
Eirros wrote:Are you kidding? Even if you miss your target, you still have a chance that they'll step on the mine! Imagine if you fired a couple hundred of those into an advancing army!
The resulting chaos would be awesome.

by Laos Refugees » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:02 pm


by Uawc » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:18 pm
Laos Refugees wrote:
The Isa'za Falcon
Yeah..a simple minigun, that is attached to the roof of tanks,BMPs,APCs,Helicopters, all that good stuff. The bi-pods that attach it to the vehicle can be removed, if the controller is feeling strong,however, only the strongest elites of my country can fire it, sometimes, two grips are attached, in which two people hold it, one of both sides, and fire it as so, which, is rather hard.

by Laos Refugees » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:20 pm
I wouldn't, I mean, that actually looks like someone could hold it, why my minigun weighs quite a lot, and, you have to remember, I made this minigun in about..ten minutes, I just took a grip, two receivers off the only machine gun in PMG, and added a bunch of barrels, plus some bi-pods. Nothing special TBH.

by Uawc » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:25 pm
Laos Refugees wrote:I wouldn't, I mean, that actually looks like someone could hold it, why my minigun weighs quite a lot, and, you have to remember, I made this minigun in about..ten minutes, I just took a grip, two receivers off the only machine gun in PMG, and added a bunch of barrels, plus some bi-pods. Nothing special TBH.

by Rancilia » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:42 pm
Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Rancilia wrote:UAWC, your reliance on SMG's with to much stopping power and virtually no accuracy and automatic shotguns was very ineffective. I mean , come on man, admit it. My M4A1 carbine with its red dot sight and SOPMOD attachments beats the crap out of your AK-47 (As with its variants). The only bigger waste of money than buying your soldiers AK-47's is betting on the Knicks!( Yes I stole that from Family Guy, and no offense to you Knicks fans out there, because Nate Robinson is actually pretty good).
My AK-74M's with Kobra or 1P29 sights beat both of your weapons, especially when troop experience and training are taken into account.

by Laos Refugees » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:43 pm
Rancilia wrote:Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Rancilia wrote:UAWC, your reliance on SMG's with to much stopping power and virtually no accuracy and automatic shotguns was very ineffective. I mean , come on man, admit it. My M4A1 carbine with its red dot sight and SOPMOD attachments beats the crap out of your AK-47 (As with its variants). The only bigger waste of money than buying your soldiers AK-47's is betting on the Knicks!( Yes I stole that from Family Guy, and no offense to you Knicks fans out there, because Nate Robinson is actually pretty good).
My AK-74M's with Kobra or 1P29 sights beat both of your weapons, especially when troop experience and training are taken into account.
Well, the Spetsnaz aren't necessarily trained properly. the Spetsnaz are trained to feel no pain, yes, but in order to get up close and personal with an opponent, they have to go in packs. They're trained like wolves basically, in that sense.They just get in and do fancy combat spins and think they make themselves look cool. But, I'm largely a fan of the U.S.A's military strategy ( As it's the country I live in), because we don't have to go in groups, and in the same amount of time one of your guys is rolling around on the ground, I can just point and shoot. Really, there just making themselves look like asses. Oh, and by the way, the M4A1 and MP5k with red dot sight and SOPMOD attachments tops your AK-74( Which is just as inaccurate as the AK-47) by a long shot.

by Russanland » Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:25 pm
UAWC wrote:Futuristic, but not so much that it doesn't look feasible. Nice work.


by Ocasnia » Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:58 pm
(showed empty)
by Ewa beach » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:00 pm
Ocasnia wrote:Ocasnia almost dont use any money on military, so we most uses the M14. But some people have planned on another assault rifle:(showed empty)
What do ya think?

by Ocasnia » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:08 pm

by Barrettstia » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:45 pm
Ocasnia wrote:
Well, the magasine is a drum magasine that sits on the grip(i also said it was showed empty). It is actually better than i thought. Thanks, anyway

by Chernobyl-Pripyat » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:01 pm
Rancilia wrote:Well, the Spetsnaz aren't necessarily trained properly. the Spetsnaz are trained to feel no pain, yes, but in order to get up close and personal with an opponent, they have to go in packs. They're trained like wolves basically, in that sense.They just get in and do fancy combat spins and think they make themselves look cool. But, I'm largely a fan of the U.S.A's military strategy ( As it's the country I live in), because we don't have to go in groups, and in the same amount of time one of your guys is rolling around on the ground, I can just point and shoot. Really, there just making themselves look like asses. Oh, and by the way, the M4A1 and MP5k with red dot sight and SOPMOD attachments tops your AK-74( Which is just as inaccurate as the AK-47) by a long shot.

by Uawc » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:16 pm
Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Rancilia wrote:Well, the Spetsnaz aren't necessarily trained properly. the Spetsnaz are trained to feel no pain, yes, but in order to get up close and personal with an opponent, they have to go in packs. They're trained like wolves basically, in that sense.They just get in and do fancy combat spins and think they make themselves look cool. But, I'm largely a fan of the U.S.A's military strategy ( As it's the country I live in), because we don't have to go in groups, and in the same amount of time one of your guys is rolling around on the ground, I can just point and shoot. Really, there just making themselves look like asses. Oh, and by the way, the M4A1 and MP5k with red dot sight and SOPMOD attachments tops your AK-74( Which is just as inaccurate as the AK-47) by a long shot.
You watch too much TV. You know all those things on youtube with spetsnaz are demonstrations? they're for entertainment. I could say the same about US troops, who in videos seem to bunch together aiming at the guy in front of him, while all it takes is a single spetsnaz to do a "fancy combat spin" and waste the entire squad. As for the M4, it's barrel is pretty short. At best it's just as accurate as an AK-74 assuming the same shooting conditions and shooter. By mentioning the MP5K, you pretty much killed your entire argument.

by Barrettstia » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:37 pm

by Allied Governments » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:55 pm

by Arivada » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:00 pm
Allied Governments wrote:The Spetznaz are only incredible because they compare them to their soldiers, or perhaps the average foreign soldier.
In reality, they are probably inferior to the SEALS.

by Barrettstia » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:02 pm

by Uawc » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:11 pm
Allied Governments wrote:The Spetznaz are only incredible because they compare them to their soldiers, or perhaps the average foreign soldier.
In reality, they are probably inferior to the SEALS.

by Laos Refugees » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:13 pm
UAWC wrote:Allied Governments wrote:The Spetznaz are only incredible because they compare them to their soldiers, or perhaps the average foreign soldier.
In reality, they are probably inferior to the SEALS.
OHOHOHOHO.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Aidoshi, Nox Lupus, The Socialist State of Brazil
Advertisement