What is the main military weapon of your country?

[Uawc]

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding battle rifles.

FYFY

"For Your Furry Yiff?"

That's the best I could come up with.

[Bryn Shander]

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding battle rifles.

FTFY

FTFY?

Fixed that for you.

[Uawc]

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding battle rifles.

FTFY

FTFY?

Fixed that for you.

For The Future Yiff?

Wait, I think that's worse...

[Allied Governments]

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding battle rifles.

FTFY

FTFY?

Fixed that for you.

Oh, thanks.

[Uawc]

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding battle rifles.

FTFY

FTFY?

Fixed that for you.

Oh, thanks.

Wait, so you know what it means? I still think it has something to do with yiff.

[Allied Governments]

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding battle rifles.

FTFY

FTFY?

Fixed that for you.

Oh, thanks.

Wait, so you know what it means? I still think it has something to do with yiff.

He fixed my post, he took my post (as a quote) and replaced Assault Rifle with Battle Rifle.

[Mr Awesomest]

The FLR09.

Based on the FN P90's feeding system, it sends off standard Nato rounds at a high rate of fire with high reliability.



The FLP09

An average 9x19 MM pistol with 16 rounds. Nothing too special.



The FLRG

A man portable Electromagnetic Rail gun. What does that do? Sends anything metal soaring faster than sound. It is fired by a 20 round 9x19 MM submachine gun on single shot, and then launched even faster by the electromagnetic charge that is released when the round is where the lasers are. Longer the charge, the bigger the hit. Since the bullet trails are marked by LIGHTNING and THUNDER, it is not used for snipers, and it is used to destroy sandbag mounds, cover, among other things.

SON, I AM DISAPPOINT.

That handgun of yours - it's great. It really is. However, 16 rounds in 9mm? For a clip that size? I'm pretty sure it can hold a lot more than that.

The rifle is awesome, though it looks heavy as hell. Might want to work on that. Also,where are the empty cartridges ejected?

The last gun, well...
OOC: FT, right?

I wasn't sure how much rounds a Glock mag held, so I just guessed.

The rifle is awesome. It does look heavy with the grenade launcher, actually. I guess the grenade launcher handle could be considered a grip for it, though. And for the ejector, I think the white part right there could be it.

FT? Sorry, new here. Anyway, I know it sounds stupid and strange, but really, it's just a miniaturized version of what US Carriers already have to take down missiles. Look up Rail Gun on Wikipedia.

[Auman]

The FLR09.

Based on the FN P90's feeding system, it sends off standard Nato rounds at a high rate of fire with high reliability.



The FLP09

An average 9x19 MM pistol with 16 rounds. Nothing too special.



The FLRG

A man portable Electromagnetic Rail gun. What does that do? Sends anything metal soaring faster than sound. It is fired by a 20 round 9x19 MM submachine gun on single shot, and then launched even faster by the electromagnetic charge that is released when the round is where the lasers are. Longer the charge, the bigger the hit. Since the bullet trails are marked by LIGHTNING and THUNDER, it is not used for snipers, and it is used to destroy sandbag mounds, cover, among other things.

SON, I AM DISAPPOINT.

That handgun of yours - it's great. It really is. However, 16 rounds in 9mm? For a clip that size? I'm pretty sure it can hold a lot more than that.

The rifle is awesome, though it looks heavy as hell. Might want to work on that. Also,where are the empty cartridges ejected?

The last gun, well...
OOC: FT, right?

I wasn't sure how much rounds a Glock mag held, so I just guessed.

The rifle is awesome. It does look heavy with the grenade launcher, actually. I guess the grenade launcher handle could be considered a grip for it, though. And for the ejector, I think the white part right there could be it.

FT? Sorry, new here. Anyway, I know it sounds stupid and strange, but really, it's just a miniaturized version of what US Carriers already have to take down missiles. Look up Rail Gun on Wikipedia.

My suggestion would be that if you don't know something, google it. I'd also have to say that the assault rifle you got is kind of silly. I mean, the magazine well is right there but then you have a P90 style magazine on top... Then you have to take into account that your "typical" assault rifle cartridge is anywhere from 39-45mm in length... And that's not taking into account whether or not it's using full scale rifle cartridges which are larger. What I mean by this is that your rifle would be a wee bit wider than the length of the round you're using... Which can get pretty silly. That arrangement only really works on something that's using a pistol cartridge.

The Bizon magazine might be more appropriate for what you want to do. It's a tubular magazine that goes along the length of the barrel, but even then, it can get pretty silly too. Nothing really beats a good ol' fashioned box magazine... Except a stick mag that houses caseless ammunition. As it stands, the rifle is okay, but I'd say make an attempt to conceal the magazine well and ditch the P90 stick magazine in favor of something else.

Also, drop the grenade launcher and do something about the stock... And FT means "Future Tech" Which is science fictiony stuff.

[Senestrum]

FT? Sorry, new here. Anyway, I know it sounds stupid and strange, but really, it's just a miniaturized version of what US Carriers already have to take down missiles. Look up Rail Gun on Wikipedia.

No, just no. There are no rail guns in service with any military in real life. And there are a variety of design issues and requirements that mean you won't be able to miniaturize them to infantry level for a very, very long time. You might be able to get away with using rail guns for infantry in mid or late PMT.

[Eirros]

Who needs to invest in rail gun development when you could be spending your tax money on guns that fire landmines?

[Albrante]

FT? Sorry, new here. Anyway, I know it sounds stupid and strange, but really, it's just a miniaturized version of what US Carriers already have to take down missiles. Look up Rail Gun on Wikipedia.

No, just no. There are no rail guns in service with any military in real life. And there are a variety of design issues and requirements that mean you won't be able to miniaturize them to infantry level for a very, very long time. You might be able to get away with using rail guns for infantry in mid or late PMT.

The US navy has a fully functioning 32 Mega Joule railgun, half of what they are aiming for, they have it for ground testing and have yet to fix it to a ship. The only problem is that the barrel is trashed after less than a dozen shots and thus not viable as a weapon, but they will be working in 10-15 years, so for navy its any level of Post modern tech or if you have a generous RP host they will let you have a limited use railgun on a ship for Modern tech. But infantry, if the barrel issue is solved the only problem is enough power, so were screwed until they invent micro-fission.

and A land mine gun? Thats original although lacking practical uses

[Eirros]

Are you kidding? Even if you miss your target, you still have a chance that they'll step on the mine! Imagine if you fired a couple hundred of those into an advancing army!

The resulting chaos would be awesome.

[Senestrum]

FT? Sorry, new here. Anyway, I know it sounds stupid and strange, but really, it's just a miniaturized version of what US Carriers already have to take down missiles. Look up Rail Gun on Wikipedia.

No, just no. There are no rail guns in service with any military in real life. And there are a variety of design issues and requirements that mean you won't be able to miniaturize them to infantry level for a very, very long time. You might be able to get away with using rail guns for infantry in mid or late PMT.

The US navy has a fully functioning 32 Mega Joule railgun, half of what they are aiming for, they have it for ground testing and have yet to fix it to a ship. The only problem is that the barrel is trashed after less than a dozen shots and thus not viable as a weapon, but they will be working in 10-15 years, so for navy its any level of Post modern tech or if you have a generous RP host they will let you have a limited use railgun on a ship for Modern tech. But infantry, if the barrel issue is solved the only problem is enough power, so were screwed until they invent micro-fission.

Yes, I know what I'm talking about. The fact that the navy is testing rail guns (and planning on using them in the near future) does not mean that they are actually in service with the us military. The third issue with railguns (that you and many, many others have not noticed) is the size of the capacitors needed to store and rapidly release the energy the rail gun requires. High-energy capacitors are large and heavy, which is not really a problem on ships but becomes a major problem on smaller applications like tanks and infantry scale weapons. And they will require a revolutionary advance in how we design capacitors before we can get them small enough to make them viable for man-packed weapons. That's in addition to the other two very large problems you mentioned.

[Barnor]

Our Nation, Formed of many groups of Nomadic peoples, has many different standard weapon choices. Many of the various nomadic factions have selected their own type of primary firearm.

Although, I'd have to say that the firarm most frequently used in our nation's arsenal, is the G36c Assault Rifle


And of course, we are also very partial to our blades.



Each of our soldiers is required to carry a sword like the one above as well as a silenced pistol of their choice as a sidearm.

[Brostkorgen]

Are you kidding? Even if you miss your target, you still have a chance that they'll step on the mine! Imagine if you fired a couple hundred of those into an advancing army!

The resulting chaos would be awesome.

I imagine it would be something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqDQ8HMtIys

I challenge anyone to not laugh hysterically

[Barrettstia]

Are you kidding? Even if you miss your target, you still have a chance that they'll step on the mine! Imagine if you fired a couple hundred of those into an advancing army!

The resulting chaos would be awesome.

I imagine it would be something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqDQ8HMtIys

I challenge anyone to not laugh hysterically

I didn't.

[Senestrum]

I imagine it would be something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqDQ8HMtIys

I challenge anyone to not laugh hysterically

The only thing even remotely funny about that is the incongruity of the music choice. That is far overshadowed by the actual content of the commercial, and anybody who disagrees is quite monstrous. Land mines are never a laughing matter.

[Brostkorgen]

I imagine it would be something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqDQ8HMtIys

I challenge anyone to not laugh hysterically

The only thing even remotely funny about that is the incongruity of the music choice. That is far overshadowed by the actual content of the commercial, and anybody who disagrees is quite monstrous. Land mines are never a laughing matter.

I agree wholeheartedly with you that landmines are a terrible terrible thing and I'm totally behind the UN on this one.

However, the original version of this advert was so poorly executed that I couldn't help but find it hilarious. Then this person added "Yakety Sax" to it, which I'm pretty sure makes just about anything funny (just look up "Benny Hill 9/11," "Benny Hill Zapruder Film," or the one with the shrimp on the treadmill). Or maybe I'm just a really sick bastard.

[Barrettstia]

Or maybe I'm just a really sick bastard.

I'm leaning closer to this. I didn't find anything funny about that advert at all. While I'll agree that Yakety Sax makes anything funny, attempting to make fun of certain topics like these is really just pretty sick.

[Velka Morava]

We don't have any military.
Our most powerful weapon is education.

That and our IT industry.

[Imperial isa]

Who needs to invest in rail gun development when you could be spending your tax money on guns that fire landmines?

Resident Evils 3 had a Mine Thrower but it sucked

[Crookfur]

FT? Sorry, new here. Anyway, I know it sounds stupid and strange, but really, it's just a miniaturized version of what US Carriers already have to take down missiles. Look up Rail Gun on Wikipedia.

No, just no. There are no rail guns in service with any military in real life. And there are a variety of design issues and requirements that mean you won't be able to miniaturize them to infantry level for a very, very long time. You might be able to get away with using rail guns for infantry in mid or late PMT.

The US navy has a fully functioning 32 Mega Joule railgun, half of what they are aiming for, they have it for ground testing and have yet to fix it to a ship. The only problem is that the barrel is trashed after less than a dozen shots and thus not viable as a weapon, but they will be working in 10-15 years, so for navy its any level of Post modern tech or if you have a generous RP host they will let you have a limited use railgun on a ship for Modern tech. But infantry, if the barrel issue is solved the only problem is enough power, so were screwed until they invent micro-fission.

and A land mine gun? Thats original although lacking practical uses

Actually land mine guns can be found in just about every military in the world, cunning disguised as 152/155mm Howitzers.

Even in those nations who have been duped by the Self Deluding Humanity Betraying Arseholes* into banning anti personnel mines still use systems like a volcano and sheilder to rapidly lay mine feilds, and these kinds of systems are made up of guns that launch 5-6 mines in each shot.

Of course none of these systems are remotely manportable


Now if we turn the games with mine launchers then nothing beats the Chaos UT Proxy launcher





* if this makes no sense you need to read some John Ringo, yes it will hurt your brain but it will reveal the TRUTH about the land mine ban and other international weapons restriction treaties.

[Dimoniquid]

The M12R Pistol and the M12Q Sub-machine gun together as used by a normal infantry soldier.

The M12 series consists of pistols and sub-machine guns. Designed from the MP5 series, these guns were light, easy to use, and valued for covert-operations.

As you can see, the M12R is small, compact, and silenced for shots in the head. It also has an extended magazine, and would fit in a small holster located on the right chest plate of an infantry's body armour.

The M12Q is about two, maybe three times bigger than the M12R, and carries a lot more bullets than it. It can be compacted with the help of the foldable stock, and the silencer allows it to be used of silence missions.

SMG being the common Infantry weapon? Prepare to be slaughtered by infantry wielding assault rifles.

We don't do front lines. We do camo and sniper rifles, and guerrilla warfare tactics. Worked for us.

[Russanland]

ST-52 Assault Rifle is the most preferred weapon of the army.

[Ewa beach]

ST-52 Assault Rifle is the most preferred weapon of the army.

That actually looks pretty cool.