Advertisement

by The Archangel Conglomerate » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:44 pm
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.

by Arkania 5 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:00 pm
Allanea wrote:evil shithole of a country

by Samozaryadnyastan » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:19 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Jagalonia » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:55 pm
Arkania 5 wrote:http://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/eurosatory-2012-the-cool-weird-and-wacky-stuff.227414/
Anything here unique?
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued

by Great Manchukuo » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:58 pm

by The UK in Exile » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:08 pm
Great Manchukuo wrote:Scenario help.
Muskets and say Gatling-Gun/Rabuld (Organ Gun) vs Bolt-Action and Water Cooled Machine guns.
How badly would one or the other lose?

by The Archangel Conglomerate » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:11 pm
Jagalonia wrote:Arkania 5 wrote:http://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/eurosatory-2012-the-cool-weird-and-wacky-stuff.227414/
Anything here unique?
That crab is god damn sexy.
I've never seen a vehicle like that before.....
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.

by The UK in Exile » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:12 pm

by Grand Britannia » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:16 pm

by Vitaphone Racing » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:45 pm
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

by Grand Britannia » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:22 pm

by San-Silvacian » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:25 pm

by Vitaphone Racing » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:16 pm
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

by Vitaphone Racing » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:18 pm
San-Silvacian wrote:It looks like something that if it went wrong, they would be an lolboom.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

by Jagalonia » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:53 am
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued

by Strolingrad » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:19 am

by Jagalonia » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:25 am
Strolingrad wrote:I was wondering, how large each of my military branches are in terms of man power?
Combined, Military & Reserves I have 4,402,123 servicemen and women. I don't know if it makes a difference but the majorty of my military funding goes to the Airforce.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued

by Samozaryadnyastan » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:44 am
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Immoren » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:47 am
Yes Im Biop wrote:Purpelia wrote:No but he did. But now for something completely unrelated. I want to ask what you people think of my new concept for squad level tactics. The idea is as fallows:
Each squad consists out of 11 men. The squad commander is also the IFV commander and mans the squad IFV (BMP-3) with a 2 men crew. One of the two crew is trained as a mechanic and another as the squad medic. Although all men have basic first aid training. The remaining 8 men are divided into two sections. The rifle section is composed of 4 men, armed with rifles (select fire bullpup battle rifle, 7.5 Swiss) and hand grenades. One of them also has an UGL and another carries a RPG-7. Disposable RPG's are available in the IFV for deployment as needed. The second section is the heavy weapon section. It is composed of 2 heavy weapon crews, one with a GMPG (MG3 rechambered in 7.5 Swiss) and another with a grenade rifle (A light, man portable GMG. Something like this). Each crew consists of a gunner with the respective weapon and an assistant with a battle rifle and extra munitions. The combat doctrine is that the rifle section serves to provide covering fire for the heavy weapon section, flush enemies out or assault positions. Where as the heavy weapon section uses its overwhelming firepower and is the one that inflicts casualties on the enemy.
First off...Thats a sexy grenade launcher... This is gonna be a Very very big IFV. To fit 11 people. The Marines LAV (Fars as i know anyway) Can only hold 6 men comfortably.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Kievan People » Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:33 am
Purpelia wrote:The Kievan People wrote:
Sigh. That might actually be an improvement if it were true.
But that would give me a platform that does so many things at once that it can't do anything right. The idea here is that instead of developing 3 different systems that share everything but the sensors I develop one and than develop the sensors on the side and issue combinations as needed.
The Kievan People wrote:
1. Ditch the anti-aircraft role.
2. Forget about direct fire.
OR
1. Forget about artillery rockets.

by Ularn » Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:45 am

by The Reliquary » Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:53 am
Ularn wrote:Got a military history question here:
How was it that the Romans were able to utilise sword-wielding infantry so effectively when everyone else preferred spears or other forms of long pointy sticks? Also, could their strategy have still worked against the weapons and tactics of the Middle Ages?

by Liugark » Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:56 am
Ularn wrote:Got a military history question here:
How was it that the Romans were able to utilise sword-wielding infantry so effectively when everyone else preferred spears or other forms of long pointy sticks? Also, could their strategy have still worked against the weapons and tactics of the Middle Ages?

by Ularn » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:20 am
The Reliquary wrote:Ularn wrote:Got a military history question here:
How was it that the Romans were able to utilise sword-wielding infantry so effectively when everyone else preferred spears or other forms of long pointy sticks? Also, could their strategy have still worked against the weapons and tactics of the Middle Ages?
By using fuck-off massive shields, close formations and professional soldiers. The weakness of the legions was when facing cavalry, something that would severely handicap them in the Medieval period. They'd also need leg and arm protection by then too.


by Liugark » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:35 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Lurinsk
Advertisement