MAIN MILITARY WEAPON OF YOUR COUNTRY (MK. II) P2

[Licana]

It's all about using your fists men, those who lost the ways of old are doomed to be taken over.

Guns>>>fists>>>>>AK-47

Ak-47 is a gun.

derp.

[Sino-Japanese Empire]

He's a trender. Just going with the flow of hate for the 47 without any original thought of his own.

[Karaig]

^^ Agreed.

^^ @RTL: what a bunch of dumb cave men your military must be composed off!

i agree.

There is little a fist can do stop stop a 4-inch gauss propelled spike from punching through your brain.

[Valtarin]

The V-197 All-Purpose Assault Handcannon, our troops like to call it the Hellcaller. Capable of firing Armor Piercing, Incendiary, Explosive, High Impact and Cryo Rounds, as well as normal 6mm Rounds. Has three firing mods; Single Shot, Semi-Automatic and Spread. Can be easily taken apart and reassembled, making transportation easy and quick. The 'hilt' of the gun contains a hidden vial of 'insta-death' poison, should one of our soldiers find themselves in a situation that may end in their capture. The gun itself is equipped with DNA recognition, anyone who is not authorized to use the Hellcaller will find the gun self destruction in their hands.

[Anemos Major]

^^ @RTL: what a bunch of dumb cave men your military must be composed off!

i agree.

There is little a fist can do stop stop a 4-inch gauss propelled spike from punching through your brain.

Apart from setting up a force field and subsequently nailing you with a jet-propelled uppercut?

Haven't you seen the cartoons?

[The Soviet Technocracy]

People are forgetting that the biggest threat in a zombie apocalypse are not zombies.

They are the smart people with FN FALs who decide to steal stuff from suckers who tote .22s

Eh I would just Blow there head or bash their head in with a M-14 or continully snipe at hem with a AR-10 with it's ability to hold a high capacity.

this is cod where guns with similar magazine dimensions hold drastically different amounts of ammo

p sure all big mbrs of cold war (ar-10, m14, fal, g3) used 20 rounders as primary magazines

30 rounders were reserved for HBAR variants like the C2

[New Korongo]

I think an accurized M14 would be better in the sniper role than the AR-10

[Indeos]

People are forgetting that the biggest threat in a zombie apocalypse are not zombies.

They are the smart people with FN FALs who decide to steal stuff from suckers who tote .22s

Eh I would just Blow there head or bash their head in with a M-14 or continully snipe at hem with a AR-10 with it's ability to hold a high capacity.

Scroll up, read the bit about actually killing people. Since it's doubtful you (or any of us, really) are any type of hardass, you won't be killing anyone.

[The Soviet Technocracy]

I think an accurized M14 would be better in the sniper role than the AR-10

M-14 is already accurised, rly. |:

Irons on that thing rape. Rape like a Thai ladyboy...

[The Soviet Technocracy]

this is cod where guns with similar magazine dimensions hold drastically different amounts of ammo

p sure all big mbrs of cold war (ar-10, m14, fal, g3) used 20 rounders as primary magazines

30 rounders were reserved for HBAR variants like the C2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5cJCc-Q4O8http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPrJVD2xc1A&feature=relatedAnother point bites the dust.

First video is standard 20 round AR-10 magazine.

Second video is special HBAR LMG variant of the AR-10, which was only a prototype iirc.

Scroll up, read the bit about actually killing people. Since it's doubtful you (or any of us, really) are any type of hardass, you won't be killing anyone.

And that would apply to them as well why?

A minority of human beings would be able to willingly pull a trigger on someone without provocation.

We usually call these people "psychopaths" or "murderers".

[Indeos]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5cJCc-Q4O8http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPrJVD2xc1A&feature=relatedAnother point bites the dust.

First video is standard 20 round AR-10 magazine.

Second video is special HBAR LMG variant of the AR-10, which was only a prototype iirc.

No, the AR-10 could take weird backpack hi-cap belts standard.

[The Soviet Technocracy]

First video is standard 20 round AR-10 magazine.

Second video is special HBAR LMG variant of the AR-10, which was only a prototype iirc.

No, the AR-10 could take weird backpack hi-cap belts standard.

That is cool.

Did it involve changing an upper like the AR-15?

[Indeos]

No, the AR-10 could take weird backpack hi-cap belts standard.

That is cool.

Did it involve changing an upper like the AR-15?

I don't think so. The AR-10 really is superior to the 15, I can't remember why it wasn't adopted.

[The Soviet Technocracy]

That is cool.

Did it involve changing an upper like the AR-15?

I don't think so. The AR-10 really is superior to the 15, I can't remember why it wasn't adopted.

cuz it was an MBR...?

apparently the AR-10 was as easy as a FAL to clean, making it a rape rifle

i shoudl adopt it for PT nation

I think an accurized M14 would be better in the sniper role than the AR-10

The sights on the M14 are probably better, but the AR-10 has a in line stock and pistol grip along with the ability to be belt feed. Your probably right about the sniper role but AR-10 would probably be better as a DMR.

The M-14 is, naturally, a better choice for a DMR due to it's better irons and long range accuracy.

After all the M-14 is already used as a DMR and has been since the 1960s at least.

[Narendria]

Assault Rifle.
The Heckler & Koch G36 is a 5.56x45mm assault rifle, designed in the early 1990s by Heckler & Koch in Germany as a replacement for the 7.62mm G3 battle rifle. It was accepted into service with the Bundeswehr in 1997, replacing the G3. The G36 is gas-operated and feeds from a 30-round detachable box magazine or 100-round C-Mag drum magazine.yeahh! g36 rulez! for special forces and for the regular forces

[Indeos]

I don't think so. The AR-10 really is superior to the 15, I can't remember why it wasn't adopted.

cuz it was an MBR...?

apparently the AR-10 was as easy as a FAL to clean, making it a rape rifle

i shoudl adopt it for PT nation

The sights on the M14 are probably better, but the AR-10 has a in line stock and pistol grip along with the ability to be belt feed. Your probably right about the sniper role but AR-10 would probably be better as a DMR.

The M-14 is, naturally, a better choice for a DMR due to it's better irons and long range accuracy.

After all the M-14 is already used as a DMR and has been since the 1960s at least.

It was a barrel problem. They used a lighter non-steel barrel that failed in a test, and they couldn't fix it in time. Some of the guns sold, but it definitely should've replaced the M1. And it'd probably still be the standard rifle today if it had.

[The Soviet Technocracy]

cuz it was an MBR...?

apparently the AR-10 was as easy as a FAL to clean, making it a rape rifle

i shoudl adopt it for PT nation



The M-14 is, naturally, a better choice for a DMR due to it's better irons and long range accuracy.

After all the M-14 is already used as a DMR and has been since the 1960s at least.

It was a barrel problem. They used a lighter non-steel barrel that failed in a test, and they couldn't fix it in time. Some of the guns sold, but it definitely should've replaced the M1. And it'd probably still be the standard rifle today if it had.

1) We already had an MBR, the M-14.
2) We were in the process of transitioning to a smaller cartridge.

That's probably why the AR-10 was axed for US military procurement and the AR-15 was developed using the same platform. |:

Besides, it was adopted by the Sudanese and Portuguese, so it wasn't clearly not ready, just too late for the US Army.

[New Korongo]

IIRC the AR-10 and the T-44 entered the same competition for the next MBR, the T-44 (M14) won. So the M14 was not already adopted.

[Indeos]

It was a barrel problem. They used a lighter non-steel barrel that failed in a test, and they couldn't fix it in time. Some of the guns sold, but it definitely should've replaced the M1. And it'd probably still be the standard rifle today if it had.

1) We already had an MBR, the M-14.
2) We were in the process of transitioning to a smaller cartridge.

That's probably why the AR-10 was axed for US military procurement and the AR-15 was developed using the same platform. |:

Besides, it was adopted by the Sudanese and Portuguese, so it wasn't clearly not ready, just too late for the US Army.

It was pre-M-14, the cartridge transition hadn't happened yet, and it was adopted by the Sudanese an Portuguese after they fixed it. Alt linked to the article, check it out.

[Indeos]

I doubt anyone in here is really much of a sword expert, but I'd like to hear opinions on single vs double edged blades, different point types, and optimal sword length. (For the purpose of deciding what type of sword my Rutilus Tutela (noble-born personal guards of the Czar) wield.)

[Indeos]

I doubt anyone in here is really much of a sword expert, but I'd like to hear opinions on single vs double edged blades, different point types, and optimal sword length. (For the purpose of deciding what type of sword my Rutilus Tutela (noble-born personal guards of the Czar) wield.)

What is your terrain, weather, , enemy armor like, enemy infantry like, your army like, your resources, etc?

It's for a MT honour guard unit, they won't be fighting in terrain beyond a building much. Mainly for intimidation and foiling lolobvious assassination attempts, and sometimes acting as diplomats and generals. So enemy armor will probably be lightweight bulletproof vests at most, and they'll likely be using guns of some sort. Resources aren't a problem, they're all rich and self-funded.

[Karaig]

The SPKR-50.

Rapid fire, gauss propelled 6-inch steel spikes. 50 round clip.

[Indeos]

It's for a MT honour guard unit, they won't be fighting in terrain beyond a building much. Mainly for intimidation and foiling lolobvious assassination attempts, and sometimes acting as diplomats and generals. So enemy armor will probably be lightweight bulletproof vests at most, and they'll likely be using guns of some sort. Resources aren't a problem, they're all rich and self-funded.

A Serrated modernized falcata, kopis, or kukri.

Why the love for forward-curving single edge swords? Also, serration is bad because it makes swords less effective as swords.

[Interstellar Britannia]

It won't help if the other guy can't pull the trigger either...

It's very difficult to condition a human being to willingly shoot at another one.

Agreed. That's why I used the example of a 'hardass'. You know, someone who maybe has killed someone, or someone who does use violence to settle disputes, as opposed to two 'average' people. On Killing and On Combat ought to be required reading before RPing on NS.

The guilt associated with killing is a modern phenomenon. In times where violence is a daily occurance, such as the Dark ages or a zombie apocalypses, where the survivors spend every day shooting what are very much humans in everything but sentience, relying upon people to not shoot first and ask questions second is a bit of a stretch.

[Indeos]

Why the love for forward-curving single edge swords? Also, serration is bad because it makes swords less effective as swords.

Because they have great cutting and chopping properties which are a swell thing to have against a lightly armored opponent. Add the swords serration is for imitation and the Spartas put slight amounts of serration on there kopises for ripping properties. I would also recommend the Glaudius and the kilik.

They're also not particularly multi-use in combat. So, they're out. I think I'm gonna go with a straight double-edge sword, since they pretty strongly resemble knights already.

Also, the gladius is shit for one-on-one combat against other swords. Even with a shield, the length puts you at a huge disadvantage. What in seven hells is a kilik?