Advertisement

by Phonencia » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:01 am


by Indeos » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:03 am
Phonencia wrote:Ive fired a remington700 before. it's a sniper rifle, it holds four, maybe five rounds, depending on the model.
If you want to take out a few zombies at long range with a slow rate of fire, slow reload, and small ammo capacity, go right ahead, but just remember, zombies generally outnumber you, and usually come at you fairly quickly (not like running but they overwhelm you from all directions most of the time)

by SlavicRepublics » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:08 am
Indeos wrote:Phonencia wrote:Ive fired a remington700 before. it's a sniper rifle, it holds four, maybe five rounds, depending on the model.
If you want to take out a few zombies at long range with a slow rate of fire, slow reload, and small ammo capacity, go right ahead, but just remember, zombies generally outnumber you, and usually come at you fairly quickly (not like running but they overwhelm you from all directions most of the time)
And your .22 is going to do so much better, because it takes you 4+x the shots to take out one zombie. There are plenty of 7.62 NATO civilian rifles that can take 20+ round magazines, too.

by The Soviet Technocracy » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:10 am
SlavicRepublics wrote:Indeos wrote:
And your .22 is going to do so much better, because it takes you 4+x the shots to take out one zombie. There are plenty of 7.62 NATO civilian rifles that can take 20+ round magazines, too.
go for the 7.62x39mm then, its cheap efficent and its plentiful. really easily acquired and can take down a zombie with a shot to the head

by Indeos » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:11 am
SlavicRepublics wrote:Indeos wrote:
And your .22 is going to do so much better, because it takes you 4+x the shots to take out one zombie. There are plenty of 7.62 NATO civilian rifles that can take 20+ round magazines, too.
go for the 7.62x39mm then, its cheap efficent and its plentiful. really easily acquired and can take down a zombie with a shot to the head

by SlavicRepublics » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:15 am

by The Soviet Technocracy » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:15 am
Indeos wrote:SlavicRepublics wrote:go for the 7.62x39mm then, its cheap efficent and its plentiful. really easily acquired and can take down a zombie with a shot to the head
If you're in an Eastern Bloc country. In the US, your best bet is something like the .30-06.
1. Acquire surplus M1 Garand through CMP
2. Acquire lots of .30-06, plus powder, primer, bullets, etc. (Stuff for reloading spent bullets.)
3. ?????
4. Profit.

by Interstellar Britannia » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:46 am

by Soviet Haaregrad » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:48 am
Interstellar Britannia wrote:People are forgetting that the biggest threat in a zombie apocalypse are not zombies.
They are the smart people with FN FALs who decide to steal stuff from suckers who tote .22s

by The Soviet Technocracy » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:55 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Interstellar Britannia wrote:People are forgetting that the biggest threat in a zombie apocalypse are not zombies.
They are the smart people with FN FALs who decide to steal stuff from suckers who tote .22s
A hardass with a .22 will kill every internet tough guy with an FAL he crosses if need be. Having the better gun doesn't mean shit if you can't bring yourself to fire it at the enemy.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:01 am
The Soviet Technocracy wrote:Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
A hardass with a .22 will kill every internet tough guy with an FAL he crosses if need be. Having the better gun doesn't mean shit if you can't bring yourself to fire it at the enemy.
No, but a .30 NATO has thrice the effective range of a .22 NATO.
And a lot more penetrating power against light cover like car doors and cement walls than the M193 Paramilitary Ball.

by The Soviet Technocracy » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:02 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:The Soviet Technocracy wrote:
No, but a .30 NATO has thrice the effective range of a .22 NATO.
And a lot more penetrating power against light cover like car doors and cement walls than the M193 Paramilitary Ball.
Not denying or doubting that for a second. Won't make any difference if the guy with the FAL can't bring himself to pull the trigger.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:13 am
The Soviet Technocracy wrote:Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
Not denying or doubting that for a second. Won't make any difference if the guy with the FAL can't bring himself to pull the trigger.
It won't help if the other guy can't pull the trigger either...
It's very difficult to condition a human being to willingly shoot at another one.

by Amuparia » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:59 am

by Phonencia » Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:56 am

by Imeriata » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:56 am
Afkfjdsjg wrote:why the fuck are we discussing zombie apocalypses again
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!

by Vingtor » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:14 pm

by Altimaea » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:16 pm
Castleclose wrote:


by Richard the Lame » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:51 pm

by Bajireyn » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:52 pm
Richard the Lame wrote:It's all about using your fists men, those who lost the ways of old are doomed to be taken over.
Guns>>>fists>>>>>AK-47
by Anemos Major » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:57 pm
Richard the Lame wrote:It's all about using your fists men, those who lost the ways of old are doomed to be taken over.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Alliance Star, Imperatorskiy Rossiya
Advertisement