Lie to me and say you are going to pick one round for all of them. Just so your quartermaster can sleep at night.
Advertisement

by Vingtor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:26 am

by Lebowa Seko » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:31 am


by Vingtor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:32 am
Lebowa Seko wrote:(Image)
The SaAL 51 submachine gun is issued mostly to pilots and vehicle crews. A large amount of them were made in the late 1960s to replace the older Sten Mk II then in service. Some soldiers, often referred to as 'double idiots', carry one SaAL 51 in each hand with their stocks folded.
Weight: 3.9 kg
Length: 785 mm (Stock Unfolded)
Barrel Length: 245 mm
Cartridge: .45 ACP
Rate of Fire: 500 rpm
Action: Blowback, Open Bolt
Effective Range: 75 m
Sights: U-notch rear sight, post foresight.

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:33 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Vingtor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:42 am


by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:55 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Vingtor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:56 am

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:04 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Yasashii » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:41 am

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:57 am
Yasashii wrote:The most common military weapons are the Daewoo K11, which is the standard issue assault rifle, and the Daewoo K7, which is used by special ops, diplomatic security, and special police units. Many other guns remain in use.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Imeriata » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:00 am
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:09 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Imeriata » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:31 am
of course not all swords will be the same, quite the contrary so will most of them be unique but as most of them had rounded tips so could that be something to look intoMunathanura wrote:Imeriata wrote:If you want a Viking sword so would I recommend making it longer and thicker and not as pointy as you want it to be heavy rather and hard hitting rather than sharp and light.
It looks pretty wide at the guard to me, and not all Viking swords had such rounded points. For example, the Petersen Type AE had a relatively sharp point. Not quite sharp as Vingtor's, mind, but given the level of detail he's using, he could easily be using such a point.
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:43 am
Imeriata wrote:of course not all swords will be the same, quite the contrary so will most of them be unique but as most of them had rounded tips so could that be something to look intoMunathanura wrote:
It looks pretty wide at the guard to me, and not all Viking swords had such rounded points. For example, the Petersen Type AE had a relatively sharp point. Not quite sharp as Vingtor's, mind, but given the level of detail he's using, he could easily be using such a point.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Fischermann » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:01 am
Lebowa Seko wrote:(Image)
The SaAL 51 submachine gun is issued mostly to pilots and vehicle crews. A large amount of them were made in the late 1960s to replace the older Sten Mk II then in service. Some soldiers, often referred to as 'double idiots', carry one SaAL 51 in each hand with their stocks folded.
Weight: 3.9 kg
Length: 785 mm (Stock Unfolded)
Barrel Length: 245 mm
Cartridge: .45 ACP
Rate of Fire: 500 rpm
Action: Blowback, Open Bolt
Effective Range: 75 m
Sights: U-notch rear sight, post foresight.

by Anemos Major » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:10 am
Fischermann wrote:Lebowa Seko wrote:(Image)
The SaAL 51 submachine gun is issued mostly to pilots and vehicle crews. A large amount of them were made in the late 1960s to replace the older Sten Mk II then in service. Some soldiers, often referred to as 'double idiots', carry one SaAL 51 in each hand with their stocks folded.
Weight: 3.9 kg
Length: 785 mm (Stock Unfolded)
Barrel Length: 245 mm
Cartridge: .45 ACP
Rate of Fire: 500 rpm
Action: Blowback, Open Bolt
Effective Range: 75 m
Sights: U-notch rear sight, post foresight.
Isn't it quite heavy for a SMG like that? The AK is lighter than that.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Imeriata » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:17 am
Munathanura wrote:Imeriata wrote: of course not all swords will be the same, quite the contrary so will most of them be unique but as most of them had rounded tips so could that be something to look into
Point. There's always the possibility that his vikings decided to go with a sharper point to better defeat enemy armour.
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:33 am
Imeriata wrote:Munathanura wrote:
Point. There's always the possibility that his vikings decided to go with a sharper point to better defeat enemy armour.
Which would actually be a bad decision as they would have to make the swords lighter if you wanted to thrust with them, something that would be less than optimal in a shieldwall as it would expose your arm too long while the heavy Viking swords were more than capable of crushing bones and organs regardless if the enemy had armour or not even if their axes were better for that
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Imeriata » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:46 am
Munathanura wrote:That depends on how wide and thick you make the sword. Case in point: the Viking Type K sword has a similar blade and overall length to the Oakeshott Type XV, but weighs 0.2 kg less. While there is a difference in centre of percussion (50cm vs 43.8cm), Vintgor's sword doesn't have anywhere near that kind of taper, so a more appropriate CoP for a shield wall is entirely possible.
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!

by Anemos Major » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:50 am















Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:55 am
Imeriata wrote:Munathanura wrote:That depends on how wide and thick you make the sword. Case in point: the Viking Type K sword has a similar blade and overall length to the Oakeshott Type XV, but weighs 0.2 kg less. While there is a difference in centre of percussion (50cm vs 43.8cm), Vintgor's sword doesn't have anywhere near that kind of taper, so a more appropriate CoP for a shield wall is entirely possible.
Yes it does and I am generalising here as standardisation is a new concept and each warrior used what he could afford and liked even if Vikings in general preferred heavier swords
Anemos Major wrote:Right, exams are over; I'm going to spend today doing the write-ups for both the AR5 and that AR9 derived PDW, but I need to get my AR5 lineart finalised first. Of course, I'm not going to use all of these AR5s, but I'd like a second opinion, especially for those hastily produced 30 round mags.
Also, could you tell me which one (a or b) I should post a picture of on the page (i.e. 20 round or 30 round mag)? And any potential additional modifications/variants, if you have any ideas. DON'T SAY DMR, that's the job of the AR3R1/mod sF.
-snip-
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Anemos Major » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:59 am
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:02 am
Anemos Major wrote:^
I wonder what went wrong... I tried doing it by tracing an actual 30 round 5.56mm STANAG aluminium magazine. I think 8 needs a 30 rounder as well, but otherwise, m'kay.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Anemos Major » Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:04 am
Munathanura wrote:Did you use one of those US military 30 rounders? Because I've never liked the look of those. Give me a straight 20 round mag or a nice, gently curved polymer magazine over one of those any day.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Munathanura » Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:05 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Imperatorskiy Rossiya
Advertisement