Advertisement
by Ultra-Humanite » Sat May 19, 2012 2:47 pm
by Samozaryadnyastan » Sat May 19, 2012 2:48 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Risen Britannia » Sat May 19, 2012 2:49 pm
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 2:58 pm
Risen Britannia wrote:Galla- wrote:
Magazines need slanted bottoms, not flat.
There is no srscartridge magazine that isnt at least partially curved.
CTA/CLA doesn't count it lacks the sheer masculinity of hot brass.
inb4someoneposts.30cal15rounder
Curved mags are for tiny baby man! Manly men only use straight mags
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Sevvania wrote:In terms of effects on a "soft" target, which would be do more damage?7.62x38mmR or 9x19mm Parabellum?
Dear god the Nagant. Dem exit wounds.
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:9mm's fatter, but 7.62 carries more punch. Hard to say.
Brit, 20-round FAL magazines are 13.25mm (0.522in) taller at the rear than the front.
I'd also recommend slanting the bottom of your pistol grips as well, that flat bottom doesn't look quite natural somehow.
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by Risen Britannia » Sat May 19, 2012 3:03 pm
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by New Corda » Sat May 19, 2012 3:04 pm
by New Corda » Sat May 19, 2012 3:05 pm
New Corda wrote:But 6.5 CBJ make em both look like tiny baby. >5.56 damage to tissue, even after penetrating the rear hatch of a BMP.
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 3:06 pm
New Corda wrote:But 6.5 CBJ make em both look like tiny baby. >5.56 damage to tissue, even after penetrating the rear hatch of a BMP.
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by Crookfur » Sat May 19, 2012 3:08 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:I assume the hydrogen is there for gas pressure, wouldn't nitrogen be safer?
Also, you have a max range on a still day of 40m. 20-25m as a general rule of thumb.
Meanwhile, 600m BR glory with optics.
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Sat May 19, 2012 3:08 pm
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 3:11 pm
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:What about softpoints for the nagant? Would that improve ballistics without sacrificing tissue damage?
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by Samozaryadnyastan » Sat May 19, 2012 3:12 pm
I thought most flamethrowers ignited the jet directly from the battery?Crookfur wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:I assume the hydrogen is there for gas pressure, wouldn't nitrogen be safer?
Also, you have a max range on a still day of 40m. 20-25m as a general rule of thumb.
Meanwhile, 600m BR glory with optics.
actually the hydrogen is part of the ignition system, basically you get a tiny spark from the battery which is just enough to ignite the hydrogen and its the hydrogen flame that ignites the main fuel stream..
As for my typos they shouldn;t be too horrible to your inner gramar nazi just your spelling and typing nazis
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Risen Britannia » Sat May 19, 2012 3:17 pm
Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom
by Crookfur » Sat May 19, 2012 3:26 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:I thought most flamethrowers ignited the jet directly from the battery?Crookfur wrote:
actually the hydrogen is part of the ignition system, basically you get a tiny spark from the battery which is just enough to ignite the hydrogen and its the hydrogen flame that ignites the main fuel stream..
As for my typos they shouldn;t be too horrible to your inner gramar nazi just your spelling and typing nazis
I just don't recall hearing of a hydrogen ignition system being mentioned in my WWII encyclopaedia.
by Astrolinium » Sat May 19, 2012 3:32 pm
by Mosasauria » Sat May 19, 2012 5:18 pm
by New Corda » Sat May 19, 2012 8:22 pm
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 8:25 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen » Sat May 19, 2012 8:37 pm
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 8:44 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by New Corda » Sat May 19, 2012 8:57 pm
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 8:59 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by Vigilancia » Sat May 19, 2012 9:03 pm
by Galla- » Sat May 19, 2012 9:06 pm
Vigilancia wrote:So, let's do a little scenario here.
Let's say you're looking for a new weapon for police officers to use. Let's say the year is 1950-something. And, for good measure, why not let you decide whether it's a revolver or a semiautomatic? But of course, it would need to use a large enough round to be effective not only against criminals, but also against wild animals, because the country you're running here is a bit... rural in some areas.
In that hypothetical situation, what features would you request?
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...
by Vigilancia » Sat May 19, 2012 9:07 pm
Galla- wrote:Vigilancia wrote:So, let's do a little scenario here.
Let's say you're looking for a new weapon for police officers to use. Let's say the year is 1950-something. And, for good measure, why not let you decide whether it's a revolver or a semiautomatic? But of course, it would need to use a large enough round to be effective not only against criminals, but also against wild animals, because the country you're running here is a bit... rural in some areas.
In that hypothetical situation, what features would you request?
Recoil operated revolver chambered in .30 Carbine with JHP loads.
So basically a semi-automatic Ruger Blackhawk with a bayonet.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement