The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Galla- wrote:
Considering he said it involved blackmail and bribery, it was probably at a grossly inflated cost and inferior to the competition. Kind of like the USA using Eurofighters or F-15Cs instead of F-22s.
Even then the military should be the only one given any say, perhaps the government, but the population shouldn't be allowed to force the military to adopt new equipment (which costs a lot of money) just because they chose one vehicle over another due to some underhanded tactics. Perhaps the company and people in charge of the project who were guilty of blackmail and bribery should be punished, but the military shouldn't waste billions or (since this is NS scale) hundreds of billions buying new tanks when their current ones work.
That is like buying a car that has plenty of awards, finding out that they got them through underhanded tactics, and buying a brand new car instead because.
More like buying a car, finding out that it's safety inspections were faked, thus it's ability to provide protection in the extremely likely chance that you will end up in automobile accident (you drive in India) is compromised and will probably kill you.
Ofc 10 years is a long time so you still have a point.