We are looking to have this:

But we'll have to stick with this:


by Solar Entropia » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:24 pm



by Techno-Soviet » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:07 pm

by Solar Entropia » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:10 pm
Techno-Soviet wrote:Those treads look like easy targets. The exposed cockpit makes it all the more vulnerable. I'm assuming that it shoots .50 calibre bullets, right?

by Mossat » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:23 pm

by Sihelia » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:15 pm

by Hoyteca » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:28 pm

by Sorgan » Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:30 am

by Fintlewoodle » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:10 am

by Fatatatutti » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:14 am

by Carbarosia » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:33 pm

by Elleveal » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:37 pm

by Estainia » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:47 am
Fatatatutti wrote:We don't really need to 'aim' for new military technology. We need shells, torpedoes and missiles that will penetrate enemy ships and we need bullets that will penetrate enemy soldiers. We have those.
We do hope that our (potential) enemies will continue to squander their efforts on shiny toys instead of learning to use what they have effectively.
-- Gen. Castro-Stalina, Fatatatutti Foreign Legion (FFL)

by Crabulonia » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:00 am

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:25 am

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:28 am
Fatatatutti wrote:We don't really need to 'aim' for new military technology. We need shells, torpedoes and missiles that will penetrate enemy ships and we need bullets that will penetrate enemy soldiers. We have those.
We do hope that our (potential) enemies will continue to squander their efforts on shiny toys instead of learning to use what they have effectively.
-- Gen. Castro-Stalina, Fatatatutti Foreign Legion (FFL)

by Flaminpantalones » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:34 am


by Dimoniquid » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:36 am





by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:39 am
Flaminpantalones wrote:We aim for military tech that when put in the wrong hands it could bring the human race to an end. Just the human race. my country doesn't believe in killing animals for no particular reason. we grew past that some years ago. The rest of our military tech is medieval with a twist. we use lazer charged swords and lightning arrows. All of our stuff looks really awesome. If you check out final fantisy than you know how our weapons look... except ours is like 32X cooler.

by Fatatatutti » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:05 am
Conserative Morality wrote:We're sure that's what the Gauls were saying to themselves as the Romans improved their military equipment, and expanded their knowledge of engineering. Our memory is horrible, so you'll have to forgive us, as we can't quite seem to remember who won in the end...

by Crabulonia » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:13 am
Fatatatutti wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:We're sure that's what the Gauls were saying to themselves as the Romans improved their military equipment, and expanded their knowledge of engineering. Our memory is horrible, so you'll have to forgive us, as we can't quite seem to remember who won in the end...
OOC - and BTW, Gauls and Romans are OOC: Allow me to refresh your memory and expand your horizons. The Germanic tribes were thinking the same thing - and the Romans never conquered them. So you might want to rethink the idea that fancy new technology is a sure winner.

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:20 am
Fatatatutti wrote:OOC - and BTW, Gauls and Romans are OOC: Allow me to refresh your memory and expand your horizons. The Germanic tribes were thinking the same thing - and the Romans never conquered them. So you might want to rethink the idea that fancy new technology is a sure winner.

by Fatatatutti » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:25 am
Crabulonia wrote:OOC: Not a sure winner, but I'd like to see something with a top of the range assault rifle against the man with the shark cannon.

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:29 am
Fatatatutti wrote:OOC: My point is that you don't need top-of-the-range. One of the most successful weapons in the history of the world is the AK-47 and it's far from top-of-the-range. Trading in your weapons every few years for the latest bells and whistles is a sales gimmick of the arms manufacturers, not a military necessity.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Aidoshi, East Plate, Google [Bot]
Advertisement