NATION

PASSWORD

Factbook of the Unified City-States of Tsvarchi + Q&A

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Youvtha
Attaché
 
Posts: 91
Founded: May 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Youvtha » Tue May 04, 2010 4:15 pm

How does Maraque view Youth-Ruled nations?

User avatar
Star Trek Enthusiasts
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Jun 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Star Trek Enthusiasts » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:36 pm

What are the Twelve Truths you speak of?

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:32 pm

The monarchy has had several children governors in its storied 4191 year history, so it views youth-ruled nations as positive and enlightening.

Star Trek Enthusiasts wrote:What are the Twelve Truths you speak of?
The Twelve Truths is a list of proverbs by quite possibly the most influential person in Maraquean history. Philosopher Xanthaiyan is the founder of the Xanthai philosophy and the Twelve Truths are a very important set of rules that Xanthaiists are encouraged to follow.

1.All living creatures are of equal value to humankind.
2.Material possessions only bring temporary happiness.
3.A person should only ever be judged on character alone.
4.There is always someone in need.
5.Living beyond one's means is equal to living a lie.
6.One good deed is only the starting point to a string of good deeds.
7.Assisting those in need is not an option, but an obligation.
8.Arrogance and egomania is thinly veiled low self-esteem.
9.Volunteering once a week not only cleanses your mind, body, and spirit, but lifts someone else's in the process.
10.Children's opinions should not be dismissed. Learn to listen, and you may be surprised.
11.Fear is irrational.
12.Charity is the fastest way to reach the suffering masses.

User avatar
Kalakda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1755
Founded: Jul 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalakda » Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:42 pm

Maraque's opinions on various things has been noted and buried under huge piles of paperwork, because the Republic could care less about some nation far, far away.
MAKE WAR ON LOVE - Put this in your signature if you agree.
Embassies In: Noordeinde Grays Harbor Orlkjestad New Olwe Chrisman Union Meldaria
Alliances: Christian Coalition of Countries, Space Colonization Coalition, United Conservatives Alliance, Pan-Slavic Union State
-Turgov Civil War (Pulled out)
-First Russenich War (Victory)
-Operation Wipeout (Stalemate)
-Modk Riots (Victory, GA rebels defeated)
-IRS rebellion (Victory)
-Second Russenich War (Stalemate)
George W Bush AOED wrote:I would blame Obama for the last 8 years.

Old Beringia wrote:Resembling the American 1950 average style. Before everything went straight to hell aesthetically wise due to pansy hippies.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:54 pm

Cool beans.

User avatar
Kalakda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1755
Founded: Jul 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalakda » Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:51 am

In all seriousness, what is Maraque's opinion on insects, arachnids, and other creepy crawlies? Considering that the City-State consider animals equals to Humans, what is its opinion on someone stepping on an ant or killing a spider?
MAKE WAR ON LOVE - Put this in your signature if you agree.
Embassies In: Noordeinde Grays Harbor Orlkjestad New Olwe Chrisman Union Meldaria
Alliances: Christian Coalition of Countries, Space Colonization Coalition, United Conservatives Alliance, Pan-Slavic Union State
-Turgov Civil War (Pulled out)
-First Russenich War (Victory)
-Operation Wipeout (Stalemate)
-Modk Riots (Victory, GA rebels defeated)
-IRS rebellion (Victory)
-Second Russenich War (Stalemate)
George W Bush AOED wrote:I would blame Obama for the last 8 years.

Old Beringia wrote:Resembling the American 1950 average style. Before everything went straight to hell aesthetically wise due to pansy hippies.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:57 am

The Xanthai philsophy, which the law establishing animals as equals comes from, does not make a statement about insects and their like. I can say, however, that most people consider them inferior and will step on them.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:09 am

Goodness me, 16% of the population unemployed. That's crippling! How does your nation even get throught this?
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:57 am

Underemployed not unemployed.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:59 am

Maraque wrote:Underemployed not unemployed.

Oh. What does it mean really?
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:01 am

In economics, the term underemployment has three different distinct meanings and applications. All meanings involve a situation in which a person is working, unlike unemployment, where a person who is searching for work cannot find a job. All meanings involve under-utilization of labor which is missed by most official (governmental agency) definitions and measurements of unemployment.
Underemployment can mean:
The employment of workers with high skill levels in low-wage jobs that do not require such abilities, for example a trained medical doctor who works as a taxi driver.
"Involuntary part-time" workers—workers who could (and would like to) be working for a full work-week but can only find part-time work. By extension, the term is also used in regional planning to describe regions where economic activity rates are unusually low, due to a lack of job opportunities, training opportunities, or due to a lack of services such as childcare and public transportation.
"Overstaffing" or "hidden unemployment", the practice in which businesses or entire economies employ workers who are not fully occupied---for example, workers currently not being used to produce goods or services due to legal or social restrictions or because the work is highly seasonal.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:08 am

Maraque wrote:
In economics, the term underemployment has three different distinct meanings and applications. All meanings involve a situation in which a person is working, unlike unemployment, where a person who is searching for work cannot find a job. All meanings involve under-utilization of labor which is missed by most official (governmental agency) definitions and measurements of unemployment.
Underemployment can mean:
The employment of workers with high skill levels in low-wage jobs that do not require such abilities, for example a trained medical doctor who works as a taxi driver.
"Involuntary part-time" workers—workers who could (and would like to) be working for a full work-week but can only find part-time work. By extension, the term is also used in regional planning to describe regions where economic activity rates are unusually low, due to a lack of job opportunities, training opportunities, or due to a lack of services such as childcare and public transportation.
"Overstaffing" or "hidden unemployment", the practice in which businesses or entire economies employ workers who are not fully occupied---for example, workers currently not being used to produce goods or services due to legal or social restrictions or because the work is highly seasonal.

Got it.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Seperate Vermont
Senator
 
Posts: 4772
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperate Vermont » Sat Jul 03, 2010 7:44 pm

In the "things outlawed in your nation" thread, you posted this:

Firearms.
Firecrackers.
Fireworks.
Zoos.
Pet stores.
etc



Just had a question about what the enforcement was for things like Firecrackers,Fireworks,Pyrotechnics,Etc. which was inferred in this post, or if it just isn't something popular in Maraque to begin with, so its pretty lax?
No, we are not obsessed with Maple Syrup. Speaking of that, Would you like some 100% Pure Vermont Maple Syrup? We have a surplus this year.
http://www.mechiwiki.com/nationstates/index.php?nation=Seperate_Vermont
GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:36 pm

Enforcement is strict. Fireworks & firecrackers are strictly forbidden from being possessed, purchased or imported in the City-State. They were banned on the grounds that there is no room for such devices in the City-State - no wide open fields, no backyards, etc. The public simply cannot use these devices without great potential for disaster. Every Unification Day there would be countless injuries and sometimes even deaths from irresponsible people detonating them in the middle of the street - in a densely populated City-State.

The people ultimately decided that they weren't safe, and in 1999 banned them. Anyone caught smuggling, possessing, or purchasing them will be stuck with a fine and community service. They are now only used by government authorities in the official Unification Day festivities in Tsvarchi Square Park, and the people are fine with that.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:38 am

So, is your economy a mixed one or a capitalist one?
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:24 am

Mixed. Our economy is entirely privatized but the government competes in the private sector in industries such as energy, transportation, telecommunications, and so on. The private sector is regulated - corporations can not just run amok and do whatever they want, although the government doesn't strictly enforce it, instead relying on quarterly reports from independent watchdog groups, and then acts accordingly.

The Royal Corporations (as government owned entities are called) usually have the highest market share in their given industry because the people are very suspicious of corporations and the people that run them, and find the government offers better services for lower prices.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:30 am

Maraque wrote:Mixed. Our economy is entirely privatized but the government competes in the private sector in industries such as energy, transportation, telecommunications, and so on. The private sector is regulated - corporations can not just run amok and do whatever they want, although the government doesn't strictly enforce it, instead relying on quarterly reports from independent watchdog groups, and then acts accordingly.

The Royal Corporations (as government owned entities are called) usually have the highest market share in their given industry because the people are very suspicious of corporations and the people that run them, and find the government offers better services for lower prices.

So is the nation really free? If that is so, most of the private companies would leave since the Royal Corporations win everyone's hearts for their prices and then, your nation will be overrun by corruption and then, your government can just make laws to prevent people from buying from private corporations, then make the prices skyrocket. The End.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:40 am

Sungai Pusat wrote:
Maraque wrote:Mixed. Our economy is entirely privatized but the government competes in the private sector in industries such as energy, transportation, telecommunications, and so on. The private sector is regulated - corporations can not just run amok and do whatever they want, although the government doesn't strictly enforce it, instead relying on quarterly reports from independent watchdog groups, and then acts accordingly.

The Royal Corporations (as government owned entities are called) usually have the highest market share in their given industry because the people are very suspicious of corporations and the people that run them, and find the government offers better services for lower prices.

So is the nation really free? If that is so, most of the private companies would leave since the Royal Corporations win everyone's hearts for their prices and then, your nation will be overrun by corruption and then, your government can just make laws to prevent people from buying from private corporations, then make the prices skyrocket. The End.
Of course they're free, they can choose between a multitude of private corporations, one of which happens to be government owned, because a plurality (not a majority) chooses the government corporation doesn't mean that the other 10 will leave the country.

If a Royal Corporation has 14% market share in an industry with 10 competing corporations, the average of the other nine is 9.6%. That is not anything to worry about. Private corporations still have 86.4% of the market...

The government can't prevent people from buying from private companies. That'd be against the law. And the government does not have the authority to do so - only the people do, and they wouldn't ban themselves from being able to buy from private companies.
Last edited by Maraque on Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:43 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:43 am

I'm lucky your government thought of that. Your nation, I'm sure, is part republic, right?
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:47 am

Partially yes. The Royal Legislature is comprised of two chambers - one is elected by the people via popular vote and the upper house is comprised of randomly selected citizens. The lower chamber writes laws, debates, and votes, then passes it on to the upper chamber where they debate, vote, and (eventually) pass it on to the president, who then in cooperation with the king and the leaders of all the coalitions in the Royal Legislature debate with one another the law and either sign or send it back down with recommendations.

Once passed by both chambers and the council of seven, the law must be ratified by the people with a 3/4 majority and at least 2/3 participation. So it all rests with the people in the end.
Last edited by Maraque on Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:56 am

Maraque wrote:Partially yes. The Royal Legislature is comprised of two chambers - one is elected by the people via popular vote and the upper house is comprised of randomly selected citizens. The lower chamber writes laws, debates, and votes, then passes it on to the upper chamber where they debate, vote, and (eventually) pass it on to the president, who then in cooperation with the king and the leaders of all the coalitions in the Royal Legislature debate with one another the law and either sign or send it back down with recommendations.

Once passed by both chambers and the council of seven, the law must be ratified by the people with a 3/4 majority and at least 2/3 participation. So it all rests with the people in the end.

You mean a direct democracy? Oh no, I think I smell trouble.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:59 am

It has caused... some controversy. But it works most of the time. And there are safeguards against certain kinds of legislation (civil rights, for example, can't be put up for vote because it's not the people's right to decide another groups rights or lack thereof).

And it's not direct democracy if it has to pass the Royal Legislature first...
Last edited by Maraque on Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:11 am

Maraque wrote:It has caused... some controversy. But it works most of the time. And there are safeguards against certain kinds of legislation (civil rights, for example, can't be put up for vote because it's not the people's right to decide another groups rights or lack thereof).

And it's not direct democracy if it has to pass the Royal Legislature first...

Most of the time. Sometimes, ya system screw up. Sungai Pusat has built a different system. Government system information is open to all neutral and friendly nations, and since you're nation is neutral, we will give out the following information:
The government system is this:
In laws, we have to pass through the current two-lined constitution:
The protection of civil rights, force and fraud from individuals and businesses alike and the right to political freedoms is protected by law. No law can violate this.

So, if we want to destroy elections, that is not possible to make it go through in the first place. Same for destruction of antitrust laws and creation of civil rights legislation that turns out to be taking away civil rights.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Maraque
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10604
Founded: Nov 22, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Maraque » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:16 am

We have very similar protections guaranteed by our Bill of Rights, via the "Protections" clause amendment.

User avatar
Maryginia
Senator
 
Posts: 4728
Founded: Jan 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Maryginia » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:18 am

what if immigrants have their passport and medical records burned in an attempt to show that they never existed
PRO ISRAEL AND DAMN PROUD
TAKE BACK MUSIC!
Impeach Pop music, Legalize creativity, Auto-tune is theft, Real Music forever

I SIDE WITH UKRAINE

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asucki, Great Eddy

Advertisement

Remove ads