NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:07 pm

Azaca wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Sure, but you will probably be looking at 0.3%> of your population in the military.

Why is that? Sorry for all the questions, I just like my RPing to be very accurate

It is a very general number, but you cannot spend a lot of your resources, monetary or human on your military and have a good economy. Think of it this way, any money you put into the military is gone. You do not gain your investment back. Economically speaking military spending is the same as burning money.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Azaca
Minister
 
Posts: 2150
Founded: Dec 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Azaca » Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:09 pm

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
Azaca wrote:Why is that? Sorry for all the questions, I just like my RPing to be very accurate

It is a very general number, but you cannot spend a lot of your resources, monetary or human on your military and have a good economy. Think of it this way, any money you put into the military is gone. You do not gain your investment back. Economically speaking military spending is the same as burning money.

I changed it already to $21,000 after that other guy corrected me.
Read before talking to me. Important.
I am a loudmouth /b/tard metalhead with a sick and dark type of humor and quite frankly I don't wanna hear about your opinion of me nor do I care very much whether or not what I do is morally wrong. I am a positive nihilist, which means I believe the universe has no purpose, but that doesn't mean we can't have fun with it.
Politically incorrect till the day I die
Also a proud and high-functioning schizophrenic
  ▲
▲ ▲
Senior positive person of NS. Go on, try me, nothing you can do can bring me down.
Threat Level: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Pop: 41,625,438
Leader: Olav Esko
Military: 780,702

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:55 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Laser LMG Is a Pulsed weapon. Laser Bolts to save energy and prevent overheating

As for the Rotary rocket. The 3 mag at the top was just to show the rockets. Not the feed.

Still, a revolving barrel mechanism is going to be too heavy to be practical for a man portable weapon. If you want a revolving rocket launcher (And I don't see why you would because having separate launch tubes is much much easier.) have it vehicle mounted.


Hehe. Yeah. *rubs head* Probably half of the two people behind this were drunk... Anyway. What about the Plasma Cannon?
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:54 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Corparation wrote:Still, a revolving barrel mechanism is going to be too heavy to be practical for a man portable weapon. If you want a revolving rocket launcher (And I don't see why you would because having separate launch tubes is much much easier.) have it vehicle mounted.


Hehe. Yeah. *rubs head* Probably half of the two people behind this were drunk... Anyway. What about the Plasma Cannon?


plasma cannons are a no-no.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:01 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:Anyway. What about the Plasma Cannon?

Railguns are better. Railguns are always better.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:04 pm

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:Anyway. What about the Plasma Cannon?

Railguns are better. Railguns are always better.


Agreed but we have yet to make them capable of punching through Tank armor. Yet.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65248
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:05 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Railguns are better. Railguns are always better.


Agreed but we have yet to make them capable of punching through Tank armor. Yet.


Pardon?
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:07 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Railguns are better. Railguns are always better.


Agreed but we have yet to make them capable of punching through Tank armor. Yet.

Hahahhaa no. We've got railgns now that can punch straight through a tank's armor. Power use and wear on the rails is a bitch though.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:12 pm

Where would we have those exactly?
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:14 pm

The Kievan People wrote:Where would we have those exactly?

http://www.janes.com/products/janes/def ... 1065926599
I think with 32 MJ of muzzle energy you can create a projectile that can punch through most things.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Licana
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16276
Founded: Jul 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Licana » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:19 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Railguns are better. Railguns are always better.


Agreed but we have yet to make them capable of punching through Tank armor. Yet.

If you can make a viable plasma cannon, you can make a railgun suitable for anti-armour uses.
>American education
[19:21] <Lubyak> I want to go and wank all over him.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.

Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.

Husseinarti wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Do lets. I really want to hear another explanation about dirty vaginas keeping women out of combat, despite the vagina being a self-cleaning organ.

So was the M-16.

Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:29 pm

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:Where would we have those exactly?

http://www.janes.com/products/janes/def ... 1065926599
I think with 32 MJ of muzzle energy you can create a projectile that can punch through most things.


This has shot how many tanks?

A gigantic piece of laboratory equipment is not a weapon, or even close to a weapon, which is what was being implied. It's in the same category as rocket sleds and light gas guns.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:31 pm

The Kievan People wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:http://www.janes.com/products/janes/def ... 1065926599
I think with 32 MJ of muzzle energy you can create a projectile that can punch through most things.


This has shot how many tanks?

A gigantic piece of laboratory equipment is not a weapon, or even close to a weapon, which is what was being implied. It's in the same category as rocket sleds and light gas guns.

Its a proof that the technology exists and will someday be practical. While the protype guns are being deisgned for Navy warships, I see no reason (apart from finding a good power supply, but if its PMT/FT then wank away), why a land vehicle wouldn't be able to carry a railgun capable of punching through tank armor.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:33 pm

The Kievan People wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:http://www.janes.com/products/janes/def ... 1065926599
I think with 32 MJ of muzzle energy you can create a projectile that can punch through most things.


This has shot how many tanks?

A gigantic piece of laboratory equipment is not a weapon, or even close to a weapon, which is what was being implied. It's in the same category as rocket sleds and light gas guns.

No one is claiming you could weld it onto a tank and suddenly have a super tank, they are saying that if you designed a railgun to kill a tank, you could. It wouldn't be feasible for actual combat yet, but railguns currently have the potential to kill a tank outright. Beyond that, the overall argument is between railguns and plasma weapons, and railguns currently exist and can produce enough energy to potentially penetrate a lot of armour, while plasma guns do not yet exist in any form.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12103
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm

First what I am about to say is a thought experiment on PMT warfare.

Assumptions:
1) Powered armor that is highly resistant to infantry small arms.
2) All of said powered armor carries weapons able to damage or destroy light armored vehicles.
3) Some of said powered armor can carry weapons capable of damaging and destroying tanks and other heavy armored vehicles.
4) Powered armor is cheaper to produce in bulk than heavy armored vehicles i.e. tanks.
5) Powered Armor can remain in combat situations for extended periods of time.

Going off of those assumptions wouldn't tanks become obsolete? Powered armor would be cheaper to produce and more versatile, while still being able to destroy tanks in a confrontation. The idea is that if a tank engaged a squad of say 5 suits of powered armor it would destroy maybe 3, while in turn being destroyed by the remaining suits. Economically the powered armor would come out ahead they lost less material and man hours of production than was put into the tank, while crew loss remaining even between the two.

So the question is in PMT would powered armor replace tanks? I would say yes, but want to hear what others have to say.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:43 pm

Why is anyone even arguing about plasma weapons. They are stupid buzzword cannons.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:44 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Agreed but we have yet to make them capable of punching through Tank armor. Yet.

Hahahhaa no. We've got railgns now that can punch straight through a tank's armor. Power use and wear on the rails is a bitch though.


Im not talking about Tank Mounted plasma weapons. This one is a shoulder fired Plasma Tunnel. The specs we have arent far enough to make an Anti Tank rifle that is man portable. Yet.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:44 pm

The Kievan People wrote:Why is anyone even arguing about plasma weapons. They are stupid buzzword cannons.

No one is really arguing about plasma cannons. We're just saying they don't exist.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:44 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:First what I am about to say is a thought experiment on PMT warfare.

Assumptions:
1) Powered armor that is highly resistant to infantry small arms.
2) All of said powered armor carries weapons able to damage or destroy light armored vehicles.
3) Some of said powered armor can carry weapons capable of damaging and destroying tanks and other heavy armored vehicles.
4) Powered armor is cheaper to produce in bulk than heavy armored vehicles i.e. tanks.
5) Powered Armor can remain in combat situations for extended periods of time.

Going off of those assumptions wouldn't tanks become obsolete? Powered armor would be cheaper to produce and more versatile, while still being able to destroy tanks in a confrontation. The idea is that if a tank engaged a squad of say 5 suits of powered armor it would destroy maybe 3, while in turn being destroyed by the remaining suits. Economically the powered armor would come out ahead they lost less material and man hours of production than was put into the tank, while crew loss remaining even between the two.

So the question is in PMT would powered armor replace tanks? I would say yes, but want to hear what others have to say.

It would be obsolete if all of those assumptions were true. Lets work with them one at a time.

1) Powered armor that is highly resistant to infantry small arms.

Well I suppose I can roll with that, given advances in armour technologies overtime.

2) All of said powered armor carries weapons able to damage or destroy light armored vehicles.

So, these can penetrate power armour as well? Seems like you simply redefined what is considered an infantry weapon by bumping up the caliber. Also, if infantry armour improves it stands to believe that vehicle armour would improve as well.

3) Some of said powered armor can carry weapons capable of damaging and destroying tanks and other heavy armored vehicles.

That has been true since WW2 and it hasn't ended the role of tanks.

4) Powered armor is cheaper to produce in bulk than heavy armored vehicles i.e. tanks.

Probably, but tanks can carry heavier guns. Have a tank carrying a 120mm gun and no one bats an eye, have a guy in PA carrying it and you will be called the worst kind of God Modder.

5) Powered Armor can remain in combat situations for extended periods of time.

Not likely, it will be about as complex as any other vehicle that is getting shot at and bumped around and filled with dirt constantly. Unless each man is an engineer with his own full toolkit you will need to spend a lot of time and resources maintaining them. Even if everyone is an engineer it will take a lot of time and resources anyway to train them to such an extent.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:45 pm

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:
This has shot how many tanks?

A gigantic piece of laboratory equipment is not a weapon, or even close to a weapon, which is what was being implied. It's in the same category as rocket sleds and light gas guns.

No one is claiming you could weld it onto a tank and suddenly have a super tank, they are saying that if you designed a railgun to kill a tank, you could. It wouldn't be feasible for actual combat yet, but railguns currently have the potential to kill a tank outright. Beyond that, the overall argument is between railguns and plasma weapons, and railguns currently exist and can produce enough energy to potentially penetrate a lot of armour, while plasma guns do not yet exist in any form.


Actually they do. The Navy's "Lightning Gun" IS an example of early Plasma Tunnel Tech., Think of a Tazer that lights every single pain nerve in your body at once.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:46 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Corparation wrote:Hahahhaa no. We've got railgns now that can punch straight through a tank's armor. Power use and wear on the rails is a bitch though.


Im not talking about Tank Mounted plasma weapons. This one is a shoulder fired Plasma Tunnel. The specs we have arent far enough to make an Anti Tank rifle that is man portable. Yet.

The same is true with plasma weapons. At least railguns still exist and work on a very simple formula energy=1/2(MxV2).
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:46 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:No one is claiming you could weld it onto a tank and suddenly have a super tank, they are saying that if you designed a railgun to kill a tank, you could. It wouldn't be feasible for actual combat yet, but railguns currently have the potential to kill a tank outright. Beyond that, the overall argument is between railguns and plasma weapons, and railguns currently exist and can produce enough energy to potentially penetrate a lot of armour, while plasma guns do not yet exist in any form.


Actually they do. The Navy's "Lightning Gun" IS an example of early Plasma Tunnel Tech., Think of a Tazer that lights every single pain nerve in your body at once.

And something similar to that can punch through a tank?
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:47 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:No one is claiming you could weld it onto a tank and suddenly have a super tank, they are saying that if you designed a railgun to kill a tank, you could. It wouldn't be feasible for actual combat yet, but railguns currently have the potential to kill a tank outright. Beyond that, the overall argument is between railguns and plasma weapons, and railguns currently exist and can produce enough energy to potentially penetrate a lot of armour, while plasma guns do not yet exist in any form.


Actually they do. The Navy's "Lightning Gun" IS an example of early Plasma Tunnel Tech., Think of a Tazer that lights every single pain nerve in your body at once.

Link? I highly doubt the weapon in question fires superheated ionized gas.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:49 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Actually they do. The Navy's "Lightning Gun" IS an example of early Plasma Tunnel Tech., Think of a Tazer that lights every single pain nerve in your body at once.

Link? I highly doubt the weapon in question fires superheated ionized gas.


Working on it. And Yes Anglo it can. And solves the face melting effect of the weapon discharging plasma. They cannon i have dosent. It creates a Laser tunnel which creates Oxygen plasma. And sends it into the target.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:50 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Actually they do. The Navy's "Lightning Gun" IS an example of early Plasma Tunnel Tech., Think of a Tazer that lights every single pain nerve in your body at once.

Link? I highly doubt the weapon in question fires superheated ionized gas.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_Aco ... eld_System

It dosent 'Fire" Plasma. But it makes and guides it.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Azmeny, Catarra, Davidtopia

Advertisement

Remove ads