NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:22 pm

Good luck hitting anything with a prussian needle gun that's further away than 50 metres. If infantry fired before 50-70 metres, they'd be wasting their shots. They might get one volley off before the cavalry reaches them. Three rounds in ten seconds? Unlikey. Maybe 2 at absolute best. Pretty hard to reload or do anything without fumbling under the pressure of 101 horses charging at you.

Even if they get a volley off, it isn't going to stop the charge. The cavalry will easily carry most of their strength through to the infantry lines and the initial force of the charge will kill, injure or disable most of the infantry. Being up high in a sword fight is also a nice advantage.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Sen
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 107
Founded: Apr 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sen » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:26 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Sen wrote:(Image)


synthetic leather. don't want to be accused of cruelty to animals.


The leather is made from the finest lambskin, peeled slowly from their still-living bodies.

The horrible, agonizing pain makes the seats that much comfier.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12096
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:14 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:Good luck hitting anything with a prussian needle gun that's further away than 50 metres. If infantry fired before 50-70 metres, they'd be wasting their shots. They might get one volley off before the cavalry reaches them. Three rounds in ten seconds? Unlikey. Maybe 2 at absolute best. Pretty hard to reload or do anything without fumbling under the pressure of 101 horses charging at you.

Even if they get a volley off, it isn't going to stop the charge. The cavalry will easily carry most of their strength through to the infantry lines and the initial force of the charge will kill, injure or disable most of the infantry. Being up high in a sword fight is also a nice advantage.


Bayonets, square formation. Calvary by the 1800 were really no longer carrying out frontal charges, they were more regulated to scouting and flanking maneuvers. Bayonets gave every soldier an instant spear, and with the ability to continue firing even with said bayonet attached. Square formation did't allow calvary to punch through the line, and allowed infantry to pile up and be ranked deeper.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:18 pm

Sen wrote:(Image)


Someone is trying to steal my god damned spotlight... Time for the ol nut hair brained scheming.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Alameda California
Diplomat
 
Posts: 729
Founded: Jan 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alameda California » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:31 pm

How effective would a T-64 or a T-72 be in a MT war?

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:33 pm

Alameda California wrote:How effective would a T-64 or a T-72 be in a MT war?

Stock? It wouldn't.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:38 pm

So...

I want to use under-barrel flamethrowers...Is it plausible?
Member of laissez-fair right-wing worker-mistreatment brigade
Why Britannians are always late
Please help a family in need, every penny counts.
Mainland Map | "Weebs must secure the existence of anime and a future for cute aryan waifus"| IIwiki
I Identify as a Graf Zeppelin class aircraft carrier, please refer to me as she.
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.72

User avatar
Hittanryan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9061
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Hittanryan » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:39 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:So...

I want to use under-barrel flamethrowers...Is it plausible?

Under the barrel of what?
In-character name of the nation is "Adiron," because I like the name better.

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:41 pm

Hittanryan wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:So...

I want to use under-barrel flamethrowers...Is it plausible?

Under the barrel of what?


Assault rifle comes to mind.
Member of laissez-fair right-wing worker-mistreatment brigade
Why Britannians are always late
Please help a family in need, every penny counts.
Mainland Map | "Weebs must secure the existence of anime and a future for cute aryan waifus"| IIwiki
I Identify as a Graf Zeppelin class aircraft carrier, please refer to me as she.
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.72

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:43 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:So...

I want to use under-barrel flamethrowers...Is it plausible?


You mean like the ones they used in Call of Duty: Black Ops? Unless you're going to give it a full supply of fuel in a backpack, complete with pressurizer, it won't be terribly effective. You'll get a few meters at most of a short burst of flame, not a true 'spray and pray' weapon like classic flamethrowers. And if you're using the whole flamethrower kit, at that point it's just a flamethrower with a gun mounted on top, rather than an under-barrel flamethrower. A normal grenade launcher with incendiary grenades would be more useful, or an under-barrel shotgun if close-combat work is desired.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:50 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:So...

I want to use under-barrel flamethrowers...Is it plausible?


You mean like the ones they used in Call of Duty: Black Ops? Unless you're going to give it a full supply of fuel in a backpack, complete with pressurizer, it won't be terribly effective. You'll get a few meters at most of a short burst of flame, not a true 'spray and pray' weapon like classic flamethrowers. And if you're using the whole flamethrower kit, at that point it's just a flamethrower with a gun mounted on top, rather than an under-barrel flamethrower. A normal grenade launcher with incendiary grenades would be more useful, or an under-barrel shotgun if close-combat work is desired.


I never really played Black Ops, so I'm not sure what they look like.

Just curious if it was possible.Though, I don't know. Maybe I'll end up putting an AR on top of the flamethrower.
Member of laissez-fair right-wing worker-mistreatment brigade
Why Britannians are always late
Please help a family in need, every penny counts.
Mainland Map | "Weebs must secure the existence of anime and a future for cute aryan waifus"| IIwiki
I Identify as a Graf Zeppelin class aircraft carrier, please refer to me as she.
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.72

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:11 pm

Posted this in the fighter thread but sicne this thread gets more traffic figured it owuldn't hurt ot put it here as well

Image

In 2009 the Polaris Defense Solutions was given the difficult of creating a next generation aircraft to replace the nation's aging fleet of C-130s in special operations squadrons. The replacement would be a low-observable STOL aircraft incorporating the latest advances in aviation. The program was dubbed C-XXX ATAL (Advanced Tactical Air-lifter) and helped form the basis for NGAPP (Next Generation Aircraft Procurement Program) The aircraft was to have a cargo capacity equal to or greater than the C-130J and a comparable or shorter takeoff and landing distances. The aircraft was also designed to be able to be adapted to virtually every role that the C-130 has undertaken in its long history of service. By mid-2011 initial studies had been concluded and work started on wind tunnel testing. Construction of the first prototype began in late 2013. In January of 2015 the aircraft performed its first flight after a month of taxi tests. Flight testing continued for the next several years, notable milestones include the creation of NGAPP in early 2012 and the ATAL projects subsequent inclusion into the program, a late 2015 STOL demonstration in which the aircraft took off and landed in only a few hundred feet not as little s a C-130J’s run, but still shorter than many comparable jet aircraft, and the March 2017 Ariel Refueling tests, one of the first demonstrations of a full sized low RCS tanker aircraft in action. Due to the high program costs however the decision was made to go from replacing nearly the wholeC-130 fleet to merely supplementing and replacing aging C-130s in special operations squadrons. In June of 2020 the ATAL officially entered service with the 5th Special Operations Support Squadron as the C-230 NIKE.

In order to maintain the aircrafts low profile, the Nike is propelled by two high-bypass turbofans buried behind S bend inlets and exiting over heat absorbent tiles to help reduce the aircraft’s infrared signature. The exhaust placement above the wings also allows the aircraft to take advantage of the Coandă effect, giving the aircraft superior performance at low altitudes. Top mounted Thrust Reverses give the Nike the ability to both descend and brake more rapidly and easily during landing as well as the ability to more efficiently taxi at rough unimproved airfields which may not have aircraft tugs. Due to its larger cargo capacity, heavier weight and jet engines, the Nike did fail in meeting the goal of a shorter takeoff run then the C-130J although its take off and landings are still much shorter than many other comparable jet transport aircraft.
The Nike comes equipped with an advanced AESA radar system, with both a nose and two conformally mounted arrays. These arrays allow the aircraft to safely and easily fly at low levels, hugging the terrain without giving away the aircrafts location, and they also serve as a communications system allowing similarly equipped NGAPP aircraft to exchange large amounts of data to optimize the coordination of a mission’s air assets. In addition to the ASEA array the Nike comes equipped with a wide variety of other communications gear and sensors including satellite data uplinks, GPS, and radar warning receiver among other systems. The aircraft is also equipped with flare and chaff dispensers to defend itself should it be detected and fired upon.

The aircraft's 387 cubic meter cargo deck allow it to carry more than 30 tons worth of cargo, including up to half a dozen standard pallets, or even a medium armored vehicle. The aircraft is also capable of carrying 80 airborne paratroopers into action, and its low RCS gives it an unparalleled advantage in its ability to deliver them deep into enemy airspace with a minimal risk of detection. At the fore end of the cargo bay is an entry stair up to the cockpit on the right and a small restroom w/ a chemical toilet and disinfectant wipes on the left.

The Nike comes equipped for aerial refueling with both a dorsal boom receptacle and retractable boom, both hidden behind hatches when not in use to preserve the aircrafts low RCS. The Nike is also capable itself of performing the role of a tanker, having the ability to be equipped with a special refueling kit containing a massive fuel tank (carrying over 13,600 Liters of Fuel) and a hose system that is deployed out of the aircrafts cargo door both hooked up to the aircraft’s own fuel tanks. The hose can be deployed within a minute and can be retracted in a similarly short amount of time. The hose is capable of transferring over a kiloliter a minute enabling the rapid refueling of friendly aircraft. This setup allows the aircraft to retain its low RCS when not engaged in refueling operations by simply reeling in the hose and closing the cargo bay door. This coupled with the high rate of transfer of the hose and its rapid deployment and retraction give the aircraft and unprecedented ability to refuel near enemy airspace with the task force aircraft’s RCS are compromised for a very brief period of time. Experiments have been performed with externally mounted pods with both additional fuel and extra hose systems to enable the refueling of more aircraft as well as the ability to refuel multiple aircraft at once, however there was found no way to do this without compromising the aircraft’s RCS, nevertheless the ability to mount such pods is being looked into for some Block II Aircraft to give them the ability to refuel multiple aircraft when RCS is not a major mission factor.

The ATAL Nike carries the traditional 4 man aircrew layout of previous Corparate transport aircraft, with two pilots, a flight engineer and a load master. The pilots and Flight Engineer sit in a spacious all glass cockpit. The Nike's cockpit instrumentation and flight controls were also to form the basis of the NGAPP multiengine aircraft standard. This new standardization of flight control systems will allow the Air Force to simplify and optimize training future crew on Corparate aircraft. The loadmaster's job is aided by digital scale system incorporated into the aircraft’s landing gear allowing the loadmaster to precisely gauge the cargo’s weight and thus better optimizes its distribution in the aircraft's cargo bay.

Then Nike is one of the next generation of aircraft, being manufactured primarily out of advance composite materials such as advanced Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers. This high use of composites allows for a lighter stronger airframe enabling a greater payload, and increased fuel efficiency due to the lower weight of the aircraft. In addition to its stealthy airframe design, the Nike is coated in an advanced radar absorbent coating to help it evade enemy radar systems.
Future plans for the aircraft include, electronic surveillance variants, a lightly armed gunship (Featuring retractable cannons to preserve RCS when not firing) is under consideration and even the capability of carrying MOAB and FOAB type weapons. An Export version is currently being developed with downgraded avionics and an older type of radar absorbent coating.
Stat block:
• Length:33 meters
• Height: 6.5 Meters Body, 11 meters Tail. Sits .5-.8 meters taller w/ landing gear.
• Width: 40 meters
• Engines: 2 General Electric CF6-80 High Bypass Turbofans, equipped w/ thrust reversers.
• Range: In excess of 3,000 miles (Unlimited w/ aerial-refueling.
• Crew: Pilot/ Commander Copilot, Navigator/flight engineer, loadmaster.
• Cargo bay is 21.5 meters long by 4 meters wide by 4.5 meters tall.
• Payload:
o 60,000lbs (Around half that for STOL)
o Up to 120 Troops (With center line Seating.)
o Up to 80 Airborne Troops
o 2-3 Light vehicles
o 1 Medium Armored Vehicle
o Up to 70 litter patients with 2-4 medical personnel
For the gunship variant planned armament includes:
2-25mm GAU-12 cannons
1-40mm Bofors gun



Unit Price: 225 Million NSD
Limited Domestic Production Rights will be granted on a case by case basis.
Gunship Variant: Price not set.

Other pic:
Image
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:40 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Posted this in the fighter thread but sicne this thread gets more traffic figured it owuldn't hurt ot put it here as well


In 2009 the Polaris Defense Solutions was given the difficult of creating a next generation aircraft to replace the nation's aging fleet of C-130s in special operations squadrons. The replacement would be a low-observable STOL aircraft incorporating the latest advances in aviation. The program was dubbed C-XXX ATAL (Advanced Tactical Air-lifter) and helped form the basis for NGAPP (Next Generation Aircraft Procurement Program) The aircraft was to have a cargo capacity equal to or greater than the C-130J and a comparable or shorter takeoff and landing distances. The aircraft was also designed to be able to be adapted to virtually every role that the C-130 has undertaken in its long history of service. By mid-2011 initial studies had been concluded and work started on wind tunnel testing. Construction of the first prototype began in late 2013. In January of 2015 the aircraft performed its first flight after a month of taxi tests. Flight testing continued for the next several years, notable milestones include the creation of NGAPP in early 2012 and the ATAL projects subsequent inclusion into the program, a late 2015 STOL demonstration in which the aircraft took off and landed in only a few hundred feet not as little s a C-130J’s run, but still shorter than many comparable jet aircraft, and the March 2017 Ariel Refueling tests, one of the first demonstrations of a full sized low RCS tanker aircraft in action. Due to the high program costs however the decision was made to go from replacing nearly the wholeC-130 fleet to merely supplementing and replacing aging C-130s in special operations squadrons. In June of 2020 the ATAL officially entered service with the 5th Special Operations Support Squadron as the C-230 NIKE.

In order to maintain the aircrafts low profile, the Nike is propelled by two high-bypass turbofans buried behind S bend inlets and exiting over heat absorbent tiles to help reduce the aircraft’s infrared signature. The exhaust placement above the wings also allows the aircraft to take advantage of the Coandă effect, giving the aircraft superior performance at low altitudes. Top mounted Thrust Reverses give the Nike the ability to both descend and brake more rapidly and easily during landing as well as the ability to more efficiently taxi at rough unimproved airfields which may not have aircraft tugs. Due to its larger cargo capacity, heavier weight and jet engines, the Nike did fail in meeting the goal of a shorter takeoff run then the C-130J although its take off and landings are still much shorter than many other comparable jet transport aircraft.
The Nike comes equipped with an advanced AESA radar system, with both a nose and two conformally mounted arrays. These arrays allow the aircraft to safely and easily fly at low levels, hugging the terrain without giving away the aircrafts location, and they also serve as a communications system allowing similarly equipped NGAPP aircraft to exchange large amounts of data to optimize the coordination of a mission’s air assets. In addition to the ASEA array the Nike comes equipped with a wide variety of other communications gear and sensors including satellite data uplinks, GPS, and radar warning receiver among other systems. The aircraft is also equipped with flare and chaff dispensers to defend itself should it be detected and fired upon.

The aircraft's 387 cubic meter cargo deck allow it to carry more than 30 tons worth of cargo, including up to half a dozen standard pallets, or even a medium armored vehicle. The aircraft is also capable of carrying 80 airborne paratroopers into action, and its low RCS gives it an unparalleled advantage in its ability to deliver them deep into enemy airspace with a minimal risk of detection. At the fore end of the cargo bay is an entry stair up to the cockpit on the right and a small restroom w/ a chemical toilet and disinfectant wipes on the left.

The Nike comes equipped for aerial refueling with both a dorsal boom receptacle and retractable boom, both hidden behind hatches when not in use to preserve the aircrafts low RCS. The Nike is also capable itself of performing the role of a tanker, having the ability to be equipped with a special refueling kit containing a massive fuel tank (carrying over 13,600 Liters of Fuel) and a hose system that is deployed out of the aircrafts cargo door both hooked up to the aircraft’s own fuel tanks. The hose can be deployed within a minute and can be retracted in a similarly short amount of time. The hose is capable of transferring over a kiloliter a minute enabling the rapid refueling of friendly aircraft. This setup allows the aircraft to retain its low RCS when not engaged in refueling operations by simply reeling in the hose and closing the cargo bay door. This coupled with the high rate of transfer of the hose and its rapid deployment and retraction give the aircraft and unprecedented ability to refuel near enemy airspace with the task force aircraft’s RCS are compromised for a very brief period of time. Experiments have been performed with externally mounted pods with both additional fuel and extra hose systems to enable the refueling of more aircraft as well as the ability to refuel multiple aircraft at once, however there was found no way to do this without compromising the aircraft’s RCS, nevertheless the ability to mount such pods is being looked into for some Block II Aircraft to give them the ability to refuel multiple aircraft when RCS is not a major mission factor.

The ATAL Nike carries the traditional 4 man aircrew layout of previous Corparate transport aircraft, with two pilots, a flight engineer and a load master. The pilots and Flight Engineer sit in a spacious all glass cockpit. The Nike's cockpit instrumentation and flight controls were also to form the basis of the NGAPP multiengine aircraft standard. This new standardization of flight control systems will allow the Air Force to simplify and optimize training future crew on Corparate aircraft. The loadmaster's job is aided by digital scale system incorporated into the aircraft’s landing gear allowing the loadmaster to precisely gauge the cargo’s weight and thus better optimizes its distribution in the aircraft's cargo bay.

Then Nike is one of the next generation of aircraft, being manufactured primarily out of advance composite materials such as advanced Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers. This high use of composites allows for a lighter stronger airframe enabling a greater payload, and increased fuel efficiency due to the lower weight of the aircraft. In addition to its stealthy airframe design, the Nike is coated in an advanced radar absorbent coating to help it evade enemy radar systems.
Future plans for the aircraft include, electronic surveillance variants, a lightly armed gunship (Featuring retractable cannons to preserve RCS when not firing) is under consideration and even the capability of carrying MOAB and FOAB type weapons. An Export version is currently being developed with downgraded avionics and an older type of radar absorbent coating.
Stat block:
[spoiler]• Length:33 meters
• Height: 6.5 Meters Body, 11 meters Tail. Sits .5-.8 meters taller w/ landing gear.
• Width: 40 meters
• Engines: 2 General Electric CF6-80 High Bypass Turbofans, equipped w/ thrust reversers.
• Range: In excess of 3,000 miles (Unlimited w/ aerial-refueling.
• Crew: Pilot/ Commander Copilot, Navigator/flight engineer, loadmaster.
• Cargo bay is 21.5 meters long by 4 meters wide by 4.5 meters tall.
• Payload:
o 60,000lbs (Around half that for STOL)
o Up to 120 Troops (With center line Seating.)
o Up to 80 Airborne Troops
o 2-3 Light vehicles
o 1 Medium Armored Vehicle
o Up to 70 litter patients with 2-4 medical personnel
For the gunship variant planned armament includes:
2-25mm GAU-12 cannons
1-40mm Bofors gun



Unit Price: 225 Million NSD
Limited Domestic Production Rights will be granted on a case by case basis.
Gunship Variant: Price not set.

Other pic:
[/spoiler]


This is nice. Where can i buy?
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:11 pm

Sen wrote:(Image)

I...
I think the second coming is here...

:-P
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
Ularn
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6864
Founded: Oct 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ularn » Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:42 am

Sen wrote:(Image)

How does ammunition get from the hull to the bustle?
ULARN INTERSTELLAR FEDERATION
Many Worlds; One Ring!
FACTBOOK | Q&A | EMBASSIES & FOREIGN OFFICE | #NSFT | #NSLegion | TRIPLICATE DEFENCE INDUSTRIES
P2tM
Broken World: Beastmasters | Of Zombies and Men
Jesus was a carpenter, so really I'm the one doing God's work - all anyone else cares about is what he got up to on the dole!

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65244
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:45 am

Ularn wrote:
Sen wrote:(Image)

How does ammunition get from the hull to the bustle?


By the power of awesome.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:47 am

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:So...

I want to use under-barrel flamethrowers...Is it plausible?


You mean like the ones they used in Call of Duty: Black Ops? Unless you're going to give it a full supply of fuel in a backpack, complete with pressurizer, it won't be terribly effective. You'll get a few meters at most of a short burst of flame, not a true 'spray and pray' weapon like classic flamethrowers. And if you're using the whole flamethrower kit, at that point it's just a flamethrower with a gun mounted on top, rather than an under-barrel flamethrower. A normal grenade launcher with incendiary grenades would be more useful, or an under-barrel shotgun if close-combat work is desired.

Which is not to say that such a weapon might not have its uses. The ability to send a short-lived wall of fire down a hallway could certainly have its advantages, particularly in enclosed environments where grenades aren't such a great idea.
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
Sen
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 107
Founded: Apr 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sen » Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:57 am

Ularn wrote:
Sen wrote:(Image)

How does ammunition get from the hull to the bustle?


Me, at NSD wrote:The loader is set up as such: there are two 4-round rotary drums behind and to the side of the gun in the gunpod. These are the ready rounds, and are transferred to the gun with a loading arm-tray thing which is between the drums and above the height of the gun.

The hull magazine is an S-tank style magazine+loader, except instead of transferring rounds directly to the gun it transfers them to the gun-pod loading arm, which can load them into the bustle magazines.


S-tank autoloader details here under "charging machines" and "STRV-103".
Last edited by Sen on Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:59 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:34 am

Immoren wrote:
Ularn wrote:How does ammunition get from the hull to the bustle?


By the power of awesome.

By the power of greyskull!!!
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Indang
Attaché
 
Posts: 94
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Indang » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am

Image

HUKBONG DAGAT ng BAYANG-PULUAN ng INDANG

United States of Indang Navy
Naval Sea Systems Command



The Naval Sea Systems Command, together with SAL-TEK Institute of Technology, is proud to present:

the PALITS System™

The PALITS system, developed together with Deans and Students of SAL-TEK Institute of Technology, is a new revolutionary solution for your naval problems.

PALITS stands for Polymorphic Adaptive Low-Impact Transconfiguration Standard

Being the brainchild of 2009 Naval Defense Review conducted by the NSSC, the PALITS system is planned to be utilized on Indang Navy's ships, including surface combatants and even presidential yachts.

The PALITS System, although similar to Danish Navy's Stanflex, is a much more versatile system which focuses on integration of systems to your ship in a matter of hours.

Image

TO install a weapon to your ship, with PALITS you'll only need a crane, disk drive and an IT guy.

Example of a High-caliber Gun 'driver':
Image
Last edited by Indang on Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tergnitz
Senator
 
Posts: 4149
Founded: Nov 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tergnitz » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:06 am

NS needs more UAVs and UCAVs; someone get on that :P

User avatar
Indang
Attaché
 
Posts: 94
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Indang » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:16 am

Tergnitz wrote:NS needs more UAVs and UCAVs; someone get on that :P

And somebody that will show that warships are not bought from shipyards, but rather from a defense contractor / project management firm. 8)

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:24 am

Sen wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
synthetic leather. don't want to be accused of cruelty to animals.


The leather is made from the finest lambskin, peeled slowly from their still-living bodies.

The horrible, agonizing pain makes the seats that much comfier.

Do you offer those for export?
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:31 am

Hiyah, me again. I'm asking a question in regard to my anarchist-terrorist puppet (because switching on an iPod is silly), how well would a home-made thermite bomb do in a terrorist attack operating during a riot? Thermite bomb as an anti-vehicle weapons, say against police cars or police APCs and the like. Home-made like home-made thermite in a closed cylinder with a magnesium sparkler sticking out of the top.

Would it be better using the ol' anarchist petrol bomb?
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Anemos Major
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12691
Founded: Jun 01, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Anemos Major » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:45 am

Spirit of Hope wrote:Square formation did't allow calvary to punch through the line, and allowed infantry to pile up and be ranked deeper.


Just going to have to point out that using organised formations with the Dreyse defeats the point of having such a weapon in the first place. By the time the Prussians were using it, other nations had rifled muskets with much longer ranges (which actually allowed infantry to engage cavalry without squares, as the Thin Red Line showed); the reason the Prussians were able to use such a short ranged weapon so effectively was pretty much because they abandoned close order formations (like squares) and adopted open-order Auftragstaktik.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Legatia

Advertisement

Remove ads