
Advertisement

by Kington Langley » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:37 pm


by Super Pie Lords » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:38 pm

by Helghast empire » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:54 pm
Southern Patriots wrote:Makaar wrote:
It's not the mother's fault either; why should she be burdened with nine months of carrying a child she never asked for? Her right to bodily autonomy and security was violated by the rapist; for the state to force her to carry his child to term is just an extension of that violation.
Silly Makaar, women don't have rights. They clearly exist only to birth superior men's babies.

by Bust Nexus » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:28 pm

by Southern Patriots » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:29 pm
Helghast empire wrote:Southern Patriots wrote:Silly Makaar, women don't have rights. They clearly exist only to birth superior men's babies.
every sexist thing you could say to someone all in one tiny bundle, damn....just damn....couldn't even just say that they had the right to live on their own to simply survive...

Panzerjaeger wrote:Why would Cleopatra have cornrows? She is from Egypt not the goddamn Bronx.

by Victorious 1000 » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:58 pm
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:If a man in your nation were to rape a woman in your nation and got her pregnate, what would happen to the child in your nation? In Kalaspia-Shimarata, the mother desides whether she wants the baby or whether she wants to give it to adoption

by The Kangaroo Republic » Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:01 pm
Version 3 of the Kangaroo Republic started on 9 March, 2014
>>Go to factbook<<
Other names for the Kangaroo Republic: The Federation, FKR, The Federal Kangaroo Republic
Demonym: Macropodine, KanganNS resident kangaroo furry and therian.
Demsoc, Pro BLM, Pro Antifa
Big ol' non-binary duder

by Old Beringia » Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:14 pm
Central and Eastern Visayas wrote:Old Beringia wrote:As if women should retain any power in marriage.
So marriage turns the woman into nothing more than the man's property?
But I digress: those who consider the humanity of the fetus moot merely because it is inside the woman's body and as a result she can do with he/she/it as she pleases ought to reflect on the paterfamilias analogy.
by Vallermoore » Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:18 pm
by Victorious Decepticons » Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:50 pm
Newaswa wrote:What is the greatest threat to your nation?Vallermoore wrote:The Victorious Decepticons.Bluquse wrote:Imperialist, aggressive, and genociding aliens or interdimensional beings that would most likely slaughter or enslave us
rather than meet up to have a talk. :(TurtleShroom wrote:Also, like any sane, civilized nation, we always consider the Victorious Decepticons a clear, present, and obvious threat we must respect, honor, and leave alone in all circumstances. Always fear the Victorious Decepticons.
The Huskar Social Union wrote: ... massive empires of genocidal machines.

by Grandais » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:22 pm

by Romanium Imperium » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:23 pm

by Aryas regime » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:27 pm

by Umbra Ac Silentium » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:31 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

by Amerikians » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:51 pm

by Rumbria » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:11 am

by Dread Lady Nathicana » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:16 am

by KludgeMUSH » Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:45 am
The government does not have any specific policy regarding this. Children are legally classified as a form of livestock until they are adults, and it is up to the owner to make this decision: Keep it, give it away, sell it to someone else, slaughter it and turn it into sausage, it's up to the owner.Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:If a man in your nation were to rape a woman in your nation and got her pregnate, what would happen to the child in your nation? In Kalaspia-Shimarata, the mother desides whether she wants the baby or whether she wants to give it to adoption

by Shin Japan » Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:51 am
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:If a man in your nation were to rape a woman in your nation and got her pregnate, what would happen to the child in your nation? In Kalaspia-Shimarata, the mother desides whether she wants the baby or whether she wants to give it to adoption

by TurtleShroom » Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:13 pm
Langenberg wrote:If a woman or a young girl is raped and becomes pregnant, and is not so rash as to attempt to break the law here, there are two real options. She might keep the unborn child herself, or she might instead choose to give it up to be adopted. Both methods are seen as acceptable in society.

THE FUTURE
IS IN THE
PAST!!

by TurtleShroom » Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:23 pm
Democratic Koyro wrote:*snip* as for the woman, she would be taken, forcibly if need be, to a State abortion center, where the child would be aborted, with or without her choice, for illegal pregenancy. *snip* Where she will learn that every decision the party and state make is always the right choice. *snip*
THE FUTURE
IS IN THE
PAST!!

by Fedeledland » Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:25 pm

by KludgeMUSH » Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:33 pm
I think that this is the sort of behavior that "diplomatic immunity" was meant to curtail, to enable civilized relationships betwee countries that may otherwise have horrible policy disagreements. For a state to casually violate diplomatic immunity like that would make it basically impossible to have any relations with them. What you're basically saying there is that you're unwilling to recognize them as a state at all, and regard them as some kind of illegitimate terrorist regime.TurtleShroom wrote:We will be forced to trial and execute your ambassadors for conspiring to murder. If the state drags women to abortion centers and kills their babies and then punishes the rape victim like that, you obviously have a Big Brother and/or Orweillian secret police and kill innocents daily. (Usually, we extradite people who come from realms that serve the Devil, but this... is an exception.)

by The BranRiech » Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:35 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement