Advertisement

by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:08 pm
Sigvardia wrote:Main infantry weapon:
Mosin-Nagant Model 1891/30
Also our assault units use the TKB-517 for their infantry, a weapon which is also used by field officers.
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Saurisisia » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:13 pm
Freedom of New America wrote:Main weapons :
Tar-21, M-16, M14.
Snipers:
Barret .50 caliber, M21 EBR, Drangonouv.
Universal Machine Gun:
MG42, M240 SAW.
Pistols:
M1911.45, Desert Eagle.

by Transnapastain » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:51 pm

by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:02 pm
Transnapastain wrote:Alright, question for you all,
I've looked a little (am continuing to search) and haven't been able to find any evidence, but I've heard tell of a belt-fed version of the BAR produced post-World War 2 and possibly fielded in Vietnam. Anyone know anything about that?
Edit:
Ok, little bit more searching led me to this:
http://gotavapen.se/gota/artiklar/kg/swedish_kg2.htm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Transnapastain » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:09 pm
Munathanura wrote:Transnapastain wrote:Alright, question for you all,
I've looked a little (am continuing to search) and haven't been able to find any evidence, but I've heard tell of a belt-fed version of the BAR produced post-World War 2 and possibly fielded in Vietnam. Anyone know anything about that?
Edit:
Ok, little bit more searching led me to this:
http://gotavapen.se/gota/artiklar/kg/swedish_kg2.htm
That was only ever experimental but, as the site mentions, the FN MAG is based of the BAR.

by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:13 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Transnapastain » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:21 pm


by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:24 pm
.Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Transnapastain » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:29 pm


by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:31 pm
.Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Imperial DaiHan » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:38 pm

by Imperial DaiHan » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:42 pm

by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:47 pm
Imperial DaiHan wrote:Anyone at all?
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Transnapastain » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:18 pm

by Munathanura » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:20 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Your "heartfelt recommendation," i.e., baseless accusation of misogyny, is noted with all the respect that is due. Which corresponds to that due a $100 billion Zimbabwean banknote. :eyebrow:

by Pridwen » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:28 pm
Transnapastain wrote:
They look nearly identical to me :/
The only thing I'm coming up with is that pistol grip looks awkward to hold...maybe a bit more of a cant is in order?
Edit:
Rear ironsight seems kinda far forward, but that might just be the scale, I'm not sure., Would you say its in about the same place the rear sight is on say, an AKM?



by Transnapastain » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:33 am

by The Highland Lockes » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:33 am


by Ea90 » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:36 am

by Ea90 » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:45 am
Pridwen wrote:Transnapastain wrote:
They look nearly identical to me :/
The only thing I'm coming up with is that pistol grip looks awkward to hold...maybe a bit more of a cant is in order?
Edit:
Rear ironsight seems kinda far forward, but that might just be the scale, I'm not sure., Would you say its in about the same place the rear sight is on say, an AKM?
They are nearly identical, that's why I can't pick.![]()
The lower one has more metal, the top one more wood.
The grip does look somewhat uncomfortable... I might angle it a bit more.
EDIT: I designed the rear sight so it would be roughly the same place as it is on AK models. Source:
EDIT AGAIN:
Here it is with a more ergonomic grip:
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Kenmoria, Scytharum, Silliy
Advertisement