Then it goes. I don't actually lineart bullets, I find it too hard.
Okay. My army never used the 7.62x45 Czech - they always used the one with the more NATO-ish taper, the 7.62x45 Fischer.
Advertisement

by Svormannhelm » Thu Sep 08, 2011 4:56 pm

by The Soviet Technocracy » Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:10 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Is it actually 6.8x43 and you're just rounding like people round the 7.92 Mauser to 8mm Mauser, or is it just close?

by Imperial DaiHan » Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:16 pm

by Indeos » Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:19 pm
Imperial DaiHan wrote:I may start making weird falling block and lever action rifles for nomadic lawmen in the 1910s, probably in .44-40 Win and .50-90 Sharps.
Sound good?

by Risen Britannia » Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:46 pm


Lineart:Risen Britannia is no longer my main nation, if you have any questions please TG Novorden.
Old showroom and requests
New showroom

by Izarius » Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:19 pm

by Pridwen » Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:19 pm
Munathanura wrote:Pridwen wrote:Now I'm aware that PMG is a very lazy thing to use, but I always do my best to do unusual things with it. I've made an RPG-style anti-tank weapon with PMG, no blending. Hopefully somebody likes it.
http://i1221.photobucket.com/albums/dd4 ... 1315463809
I would have used image tags, but the picture was too large.
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Pridwen wrote:Now I'm aware that PMG is a very lazy thing to use, but I always do my best to do unusual things with it. I've made an RPG-style anti-tank weapon with PMG, no blending. Hopefully somebody likes it.
http://i1221.photobucket.com/albums/dd4 ... 1315463809
I would have used image tags, but the picture was too large.
Warhead's not large enough, the RPG-7 has an 85mm warhead with a 40mm body. Judging by the parts used, this looks more like 10mm body and 25mm warhead. The RPG-7 warhead is just two inverted cones as well, not a cylinder. And also what Muna said, grips want to be closer together.
I like how you even included the folded stabilising fins though.

by Svormannhelm » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:08 am

by Ea90 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:40 pm
Izarius wrote:AK-74 of course. We plan on switching to the AK-107, but for now, only the Special Forces use the AK-107.

by Svormannhelm » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:07 pm
Ea90 wrote:Izarius wrote:AK-74 of course. We plan on switching to the AK-107, but for now, only the Special Forces use the AK-107.
You might like my AK-106. It uses the BARS from the 107, put into the bullpup frame of the Ukrainian Vepr (with a few modifications, thanks to Anemos Major) and has a 590mm (RPK[-74]-length) barrel, which works well with the 5.45x39mm round.
[/shameless advertising]

by Amastol » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:07 pm


by Samozaryadnyastan » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:28 pm
Amastol wrote:([url=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v203/jay3135/guns/Model3SM.png]Image)[/url]
click for full size
Full size is only 50% of actual drawing size,... I may have screwed the pooch by drawing it so large.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Svormannhelm » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:38 pm

by Empires Empire » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:43 pm

by Asumbuoy » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:46 pm


Norstal wrote:You can't fap to NS? Are you saying we're not good enough for you?

by Samozaryadnyastan » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:55 pm
Svormannhelm wrote:Ea90 wrote:Do you mean that it wouldn't work? If so why?
No. You see, the point of the BARS System is to negate the recoil of the long stroke piston system. On a bullpup, having it is redundant since the recoil goes directly into the shoulder instead of dissipating in the stock and the pistol grip, making the gun have less recoil. Therefore, being bullpup negates that problem.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Fischermann » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:12 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Svormannhelm wrote:
No. You see, the point of the BARS System is to negate the recoil of the long stroke piston system. On a bullpup, having it is redundant since the recoil goes directly into the shoulder instead of dissipating in the stock and the pistol grip, making the gun have less recoil. Therefore, being bullpup negates that problem.
Whilst being a bullpup may negate actual recoil, BARS would help control muzzle climb, I imagine.

by Pridwen » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:49 pm

by Samozaryadnyastan » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:23 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Pridwen » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:35 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:If you doubled the rocket's body diameter, I reckon you'd have it nailed.

by The Ottish Empire » Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:36 pm

by Bajireyn » Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:59 pm


by Imperial isa » Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:43 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement